Bishop: Transgender Children - The Odd Realm Where the Religious Resort to Science
Thursday, April 26, 2018
This outlook bucks the will of those who view failure of medical professionals to affirm a child’s expressed gender as engaged in “conversion therapy”. That would be the selfsame lobby and gullible legislators who last year purported to adopt this formulation as the law in Rhode Island. This is a fairly ironic point of view as the true conversions envisioned are radical medical interventions in the growth and development of youngsters.
This path of medically effected gender transition is hardly undertaken as child abuse, but with the intent of alleviating the stress of confusion when a child’s born and expressed gender conflict. But unlike various forms of social transition involving hairstyle, clothes and peer relations, these pharmaceutical interventions can have neurological and musculoskeletal consequences for youth and adolescents who are still developing. And these treatments ultimately result in the sterilization of the young people to whom they are administered. We used to call that eugenics which we used to call out. As such the conformance of this ‘treatment’ with the Hippocratic Oath to : “do good or to do no harm” is highly questionable.
It would have to be demonstrated through evidence that these drug routines for children “do good”; and, given the potential for harm, it would have to be a pretty significant good. There is evidence that social transitioning short of medical intervention alleviates stress, but the same 2013 study that pointed this out also recognized that social transitioning is associated with persistence of gender dysphoria into adulthood. In other words, social transitioning is a potentially self-reinforcing and perpetuating treatment for a distress that resolves itself in the vast majority of children. The desistance rate noted in that 2013 study was 62%, and that is actually amongst the lowest reported desistance rates in the literature, with much higher rates reported elsewhere, especially for boys.
As many as 80 or 90% of children presenting with either “gender identity disorder” or the later diagnosis that replaced it, “gender dysphoria”, as defined by the American Psychiatric Association, desist in those beliefs by later adolescence or adulthood. The point is that self-perception of gender is a malleable trait amongst youngsters so adults embracing a child’s expression of gender nonconformity can be having an effect on the outcome of the child’s confusion rather than simply ameliorating their distress.
With desistance rates that high it can hardly be suggested that modest efforts at behavioral modification should be outside clinical protocols, yet that is what Rhode Island has attempted to legislate. Michelle Cretella had the unmitigated gall to explain this. And, as some alternative newspaper called the Providence Journal reported, she made the outrageous claim that boys are born with a Y chromosome and girls are not, as if science has anything to do with this! In an evening full of ironies it was the devout Catholics who relied on science and their progressive critics who advanced a fealty to any transgender expression with religious zealotry.
That bears some consideration, although one of the latest comprehensive evalutions of suicide risk amongst LGBT populations found that “no significant association was observed between childhood gender non-conformity and suicide attempt history.” Of course, this was a particularly unsatisfactory point to transgendered activists who attended the talk because their experiences are rife with anecdotes from their community and their own lives of depression and suicide attempts. As the 2013 study does note, previous efforts have come out both ways on correlation of transgendered expression and suicide, but at best for their arguments, the question remains unresolved.
What is quite clear then is, at present, there is no good scientific support for the assumption that affirmation of childhood gender non-conforming behaviors leading somewhat inexorably to pharmaceutical and surgical interventions is an evidence-based course of treatment. Without such evidence, medical interventions in young people represent a violation of the principle that the physician ought to: first, do no harm. Yet, the profession as a whole seems willing to subject virtually the entire cohort of gender dysphoric youth to a vast experiment with no controls.
Along several dimensions of this debate there may be space for study and experiment to develop evidence about the relative benefits of treatment approaches. But in order to conduct such trials, one would have to compare nonself-selecting samples subjected to either affirmative or ‘normalizing’ therapies – the well documented alternatives, e.g., that have given promise and relief to some distressed individuals despite not affirming their expressed identity or inviting transition. Yet these are the therapies that activists would outlaw, preventing any scientific trials. Even the ACLU understood the state was wrong to insert itself into the practice of medicine in this regard.
It isn’t clear to me that medical interventions should be withheld until the age of 21 as the American College of Pediatricians recommends, but it is frighteningly clear that for a mature expression of the severity of transgendered identity that can support hormonal and surgical intervention, adult reasoning must have evolved. The introduction of puberty blockers through the off label, i.e. unapproved, use of Lupron, is, by definition, a medical intervention that precedes the maturity necessary to make such a treatment decision.
I would be the first to afford adults access to medicines and treatments without the blessing of the FDA, but where children are concerned and the very integrity of their adulthood and personhood is at stake, this is no decision from which their adult selves can be removed. It can hardly be left to parents bamboozled by a professional community more attendant to political correctness than to evidence-based medical practice.
Related Slideshow: GoLocal: Benchmark Poll, October 2017
Rhode Island General Election Voters Margin of Error: +/- 4.9% at 95% Confidence Level
Interviewing Period: October 9-11, 2017
Mode: Landline (61%) and Mobile (39%)
Telephone Directed by: John Della Volpe, SocialSphere, Inc.
When it comes to voting, do you consider yourself to be affiliated with the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, Moderate, or Unaffiliated with a major party?
Next year, in November of 2018, there will be a statewide general election for Governor and many other state offices. How likely is it that you will vote in this election?
Will you definitely be voting, will you probably be voting, are you 50-50...
Definitely be voting: 78%
Probably be voting: 13%
In general, would you say things in Rhode Island are headed in the right direction or are they off on the wrong track?
Right track: 39%
Wrong track: 45%
Don't know/Refused: .6%
What would you say is the number one problem facing Rhode Island that you would like the Governor to address?
Jobs and economy: 21%
State budget: 9%
Corruption/Public integrity: .8%
Don’t know: .9%
Over the past three years or so, would you say the economy in Rhode Island has improved, gotten worse, or not changed at all?
Changed for the better: 35%
Changed for the worse: 16%
Not changed at all: 43%
Don't know/Refused: 5%
Over the same time, has your family's financial situation improved, gotten worse, or not changed at all?
Changed for the better: 26%
Changed for the worse: 19%
Not changed at all: 54%
Don't know/Refused: 1%
Recently, a proposal has been made to permit the issuance of $81 million in bonds by the State to build a new stadium for the Pawtucket Red Sox. If there was an election today on this issue, would you vote to approve or reject issuing $81 million in financing supported moral obligation bonds to build the stadium?
Net: Approve: 28%
Definitely approve: 15%
Probably approve: 14%
Net: Reject: 67%
Probably reject: 19%
Definitely reject: 48%
Don't know: 4%
Could you please tell me your age?
Don't know/refused: 1%
What was the last grade you completed in school?
High school grad: 16%
Technical/Vocational school: 1%
Some college: 23%
College grad: 34%
Graduate degree: 24%
Don't know/refused: 1%
The next question is about the total income of YOUR HOUSEHOLD for the PAST 12 MONTHS. Please include your income PLUS the income of all members living in your household (including cohabiting partners and armed forces members living at home).
$50,000 or less: 27%
More $50,000 but less than $75,000: 13%
More $75,000 but less than $100,000: 13%
More $100,000 but less than $150,000: 17%
$150,000 or more: 13%
Don't know/refused: 17%
What particular ethnic group or nationality - such as English, French, Italian, Irish, Latino, Jewish, African American, and so forth - do you consider yourself a part of or feel closest to?
Black or African American: 6%
Would you say that Donald Trump has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as President?
Never heard of: 0%
Cannot rate: 3%
Would you say that Jack Reed has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a United States Senator?
Never heard of: 6%
Cannot rate: 6%
Would you say that Sheldon Whitehouse has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a United States Senator?
Never heard of: 6%
Cannot rate: 7%
Would you say that David Cicilline has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a Member of Congress?
Never heard of: 6%
Cannot rate: 8%
Would you say that James Langevin has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a Member of Congress?
Never heard of: 13%
Cannot rate: 11%
Would you say that Gina Raimondo has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Governor?
Never heard of: 1%
Cannot rate: 3%
Would you say that Daniel McKee has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Lieutenant Governor?
Never heard of: 26%
Cannot rate: 25%
Would you say that Peter Kilmartin has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Attorney General?
Never heard of: 13%
Cannot rate: 19%
Would you say that Seth Magaziner has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as General Treasurer?
Never heard of: 21%
Cannot rate: 21%
Would you say that Nellie Gorbea has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Secretary of State?
Never heard of: 20%
Cannot rate: 23%
- Bishop: Much Ado About the Wrong Thing
- Bishop: If Christmas is in July . . . Then 12th Night is in August
- Bishop: Slippery Sneakers, The Hoolios & The Return of Rhythm & Roots – the Other RI Festival
- Bishop: The Problem with Planning - Rhode Mappers are Here From Government to ‘Help’ Farmers
- Bishop: Rhode Island Icons Passing
- Bishop: Red Tape for Rednecks . . . Who Knew
- Bishop: Keeping it Weird
- Bishop: Water Water Everywhere Nor Any Drop in Rates
- Bishop: The Devil is in The Details - PawSox Park isn’t 38 Studios, But Just as Bad
- Bishop: Trump’s Leading in Right Direction on Climate, & Leading From the Front!
- Bishop: Discourse on Discourse – Separating Word & Actions
- Bishop: Transform Energy in Puerto Rico Balancing Infrastructure & Dispersion
- Bishop: The Ironic Fascination With Riverfront Stadiums
- Bishop: The Morality of Borders – A No Safe Space Forum at Brown on Friday
- Bishop: Justice Amy Coney Barrett -A Potpourri of Popery or the Subject of Slander?
- Bishop: The Russians are Coming
- Bishop: Warm & Prickly Welcome for Americans in Guadeloupe – a Travelogue of the Occidental Tourist