Bishop: Tax [Breaks] and Spending
Thursday, June 23, 2016
You may not think that “Tax and Spend” is wise policy, but at least its honest. If you spend a lot, you have to tax a lot. If all went as the Keynesians forecast, RI would have a great economy because of all this government spending -- the burden would be well dispersed and hardly noticeable. How’s that workin’ for ya?
But in Rhode Island we have a new version: Tax [Breaks] and Spend. Tax burdens are high and discourage economic growth. So the government has taken to purchasing growth with borrowed money, i.e. selling the future of our state for the future of our state.
A History Of Not Paying For Tax Breaks
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST.Historic tax breaks are a great . . . eer sad, example. These are nothing but inefficient corporatist giveaways disguised as concern for historic architecture. While some historic structures can be lost to decay, Boston in the mid 20th century is the perfect example of how they are more likely to be lost: to the penchant for government planning. The Boston Redevelopment Authority leveled historic buildings to make way for its brutalist Government Center and the Prudential Center.
In Providence, we were fortunate enough not to have been redeveloped to that extent. And yet we are constantly pestered to support redevelopment. Many historic buildings found interim uses, but downtown developers don’t want to be bothered with that. They would like you to write them a check and forget about waiting for the economy to catch up.
Even if you think historic tax breaks are a necessary evil, we didn’t budget for the cost of these breaks, we used moral obligation bonds through the Commerce Corporation to pay for them, a harbinger of the tax [breaks] and spend ‘fireworks’ economy.
Fireworks Economy Fizzles
The flash and bang from each growth purchase fades quickly, requiring us to head back to the fireworks factory and buy more and more, when we haven’t even paid for the fireworks that have already gone off and faded.
Like the folks bringing the big fireworks from South of the Border, these corporatist purchases need to be hidden lest the authorities, that’s us, should figure this out. And historic tax credits are but the tip of the iceberg in what is given away in directed tax breaks -- not tax relief, where everyone’s taxes are lower, but tax breaks for the select few.
Spending Not Neglected Either
Spend side stimulus is justified by allowing infrastructure to atrophy and paying no attention, not only to maintenance, but to what would be a reasonable scale of investment in specific projects. So we get a billion dollar giveaway to construction contractors and the laborers unions in the form of the rebuilding the 6/10 connector.
While the aging portion of the highway that cut Olneyville from Silver Lake was built in the 1950s, the last mile north to 95 -- that DOT insists is the important purpose of the connector -- wasn’t even opened until the mid 1990s, 40 years later. We did just fine without it. In fact 95 was far less congested when we had a larger population and more downtown business before that interchange opened. Yes the old bridges are shored up, but the answer may well be to tear them down, not to rebuild them.
Inside Baseball Dominated By Special Interests
No more stark contrast could be seen than how the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) of the State Planning Council last month didn’t raise a peep of protest to authorizing DOT to borrow $195 million dollars now for the 6/10 project that has no agreed plan and is still years away. At the same time, this same committee saw pitched battle over a $3 million cost share for an exit ramp from 295 serving the new Citizens Bank campus in Johnston.
You would think that the Statewide Planning agency that has taken so much interest in pawing through municipal plans lately, might be interested in seeing the actual plan for a major state project like the 6/10 connector before approving hundreds of millions in borrowing. But you would be wrong. It isn’t necessarily wrong to plan for some expense in the future, whether for tearing down the 6/10 or rebuilding it. But there is a distinct effort to push DOTs massively expensive stalking horse out of the barn before the review, a review which might close the stall door.
Biblically, then, the committee turned to the mote of the Citizen’s exit ramp while ignoring the beam of the 6/10 connector. A well organized TAC faction attacked a $3 million dollar investment splitting the cost of this exit with Citizens but ultimately failed, as they should have. But there was a debate. In this Alice in Wonderland world of planning, a small investment, reciprocated by private industry, is attacked while a slothful hundreds of millions feeding frenzy for consultants, contractors and unions is ignored.
Of course corporatism American style, with its handouts of public money to private projects, ought to be opposed even in small amounts. But highways are not private projects. One of the few real jobs that government has is the build out of our road system. Locational decisions by major private employers are appropriate drivers, not to mention that Citizens actually offered to pay for half the costs of the public infrastructure that was particularly suited to its own needs.
The organized effort against the plan was no taxpayers movement, it was a green coup by those who think it’s government’s job to tell business where to locate. Ironically they were undone in some measure by the fact that the location was actually within the commercial development corridor along Route 295 contemplated by the very government planning upon which they regularly hang their hat.
The Citizens Tax Break That Deserves Scrutiny
If $3 million to split the cost of an exit ramp were a no brainer, there is something else to be said about the new Citizens Bank campus that deserves scrutiny. It received a 20 year subsidy from Johnston officials who are elected for only 2 or 4 years. This might or might not look stupid for Johnston based on an alternative universe without the project. Collecting a third or half of the taxes they ought to might be better than collecting nothing.
In Providence the evidence is otherwise. The development economy has become completely dependent on property tax giveaways and the amounts paid in lieu of full taxes by developers are often so small that they make little difference to the city’s current budget. And the developers hire squads of lawyers to try to extend the tax breaks when they expire, so the city has seen virtually no increase in its tax base related to 20 years of subsidized development.
An interesting exception to this extensionist frenzy is the Manchester Street Power Station. That’s right, hundreds of megawatts of gas generation immediately downwind of Providence’s east side, where we can see property values have suffered greatly from being within a mile of a gas generating plant . . . if you think we’re making folly of the controversy in Burriville you would be right.
The tax break for the construction of the Manchester Street plant expired this year, and unlike the owners of converted lofts who cry that the expiration of their 15 year tax breaks is too ‘sudden’, the owners of the power plant are pouring an additional 4 million dollars a year into Providence’s coffers, i.e., paying the equivalent of full taxes.
Power Plants Tax Breaks Should Be Subject To Vote . . . As Should All Tax Breaks
But that does not unequivocally mean that the original Manchester break was a smart deal and should not have been subject to taxpayer approval. It only means that the corporatists read the tea leaves and decided to stick to their original agreement. Nor does it mean that the deal being negotiated by the Burrillville town council is a good deal.
Thus, while we see no excuse for opposing the Burrillville gas power plant, we see every reason why citizens ought to have a vote on these tax deals. It is not because the citizens are wiser than their elected officials or that we urge direct democracy. However, in a representative republic, elected officials do not have the power to obligate the polity, i.e., us, to contracts beyond their terms in office. Such obligations are similar to bonds and should be approved by the citizenry who will be subject to those costs far into the future, after the terms of the elected officials cutting ribbons are long over.
Thus, we opposed the special interest bill providing a vote for Burrillville residents on the power plant tax break not because the principle is flawed, but because Representative Keable’s bill was a shameless parochial ploy that neglected applying its principle to all tax treaties in any city or town. We would support the recognition that any tax breaks should be subject to a vote of the people. In fact, since they are by definition a “private appropriation” they ought to require a 2/3 majority at referendum– a principle ensconced in the Rhode Island Constitution.
Tax and Spend is theoretically subject to correction each election, but the Tax [Breaks] and Spend economy is characterized by ensconced tax breaks, attempts to permanentize or regularize union contracts, attempts to obligate taxpayers to bonds they are not obligated to, and other forms of entrenched privilege that try to outlive the electoral life of the officials who adopt them. The potential for legal reform of these bad governmental habits is limited by standing that bars citizens from the courtroom. Only at the ballot box can you truly reform. You could elect legislators who recognize the proper limits on their role. And you could elect an Attorney General who would watch out for the taxpayers’ interests and has standing to do so by the nature of the office.
Brian Bishop is on the board of OSTPA and has spent 20 years of activism protecting property rights, fighting overregulation and perverse incentives in tax policy.
Related Slideshow: The Highest Taxed Communities for 2016
Related Articles
- Gencarella: Can We “Make it in RI?”
- Pam Gencarella: Where Does Raimondo’s Vision Put Us in Five Years?
- Gencarella: Public Union Benefits Limit What Our Government Can Do For Taxpayers.
- Gencarella: A Drop In The Proverbial Ocean State Budget
- Gencarella: Let’s Leave It A Local Issue
- Gencarella: Are Local Governments Kidding Themselves?
- Gencarella: What Side Are You On? Do Organizations & Consortium Members Really Support RhodeMap RI?
- Pam Gencarella: Context Is What’s Needed - Part I
- Gencarella: RI Stands Apart From a World Where Change Is the Only Constant
- Pam Gencarella: Surprised, Bewildered, Shocked, Disappointed
- Pam Gencarella: What’s All the Fuss About RhodeMap RI? If You Like Your Municipality, Keep It
- Gencarella: RI Firefighters: Public Servants, Hardly Indentured Servants
- Pam Gencarella: The Twilight Zone
- Gencarella: The Toll Plan - One Mell of A Hess
- Gencarella: All ‘Tolled’, It’s A Bad Plan
- Gencarella: Robbing Peter (and Mary and Jane and Rob) To Pay Paul
- Gencarella & Bishop: Billion Dollar ‘Big Dig’ - Fewer Bridges, Fewer Cars, Nearly Double The Cost
- Gencarella: RI, A Government In Crisis - Nothing New
- Gencarella: ’Twas the Night Before Session
- Gencarella: TOLLS - Trucks Today, Cars Tomorrow.
- Gencarella: Is RI On A Path To Socialized HealthCare?
- Gencarella: Rhode Island - The Rule of Lawlessness
- Gencarella: It’s Time to Brew Our Own Coffee and Cut Out the Coolattas
- Gencarella: Is There a Movement Afoot
- Gencarella: RI’s Fall From Grace Has Been A Long Time Coming
- Bishop: With ‘help’ like this…? - State Policy For Providence A One-Way Street
- Bishop: Bridges, Tolls and a Tale of Three States
- Brown Grad Williams Elevated to Bishop Designate
- Bishop: Labor Piece Agreements . . . as in Piece of The Pie
- Bishop: What Do The State House & Downton Abbey have in Common? An abiding sympathy for King Canute
- Bishop: Keeping the Pawtucket Red Sox Without Seeing More Red in Providence
- Bishop: Taylor Swift Move Over
- Bishop: Transformation – So Far it’s All Talk in Providence
- Bishop: Hitchhikers Guide to Vaccine Mandates
- Bishop: Constitution Day at Brown - What’s the State of Our More Perfect Union?
- Bishop: Post-Toll Impasse Between Public and Political Will
- Bishop: The Soft Under Belly of Rhodeworks - A Connector to Nowhere
- Bishop: 6/10 Connector - The $800 Million Mile
- Bishop: Structural Changes to Address Structural Deficit
- Bishop: 38 Stabilizations - Neverending Prov Tax Giveways are 38 Studios Redux
- Bishop: For Whom the Bill Tolls
- Bishop: Calm Yorke More Outrageous Than Brash Trump
- Bishop: Welcome Joe Biden, to Roads That Don’t Work