Truck Toll Opponents Battle DOT Over Taking Sign Down Next to Rt. 95

Tuesday, January 05, 2016

 

View Larger +

Pictured is a sign in Wyoming similar to the one that was taken down along Route 95.

Opponents to the Raimondo administration's truck toll plan to pay for an infrastructure bond say the Rhode Island Department of Transportation overstepped its bounds by removing a sign on private land on Sunday -- while the DOT is alleging it was on state land. 

Andy Webb with the Richmond Republican Town Committee said that his group installed the sign on Sunday afternoon on a piece of private land adjacent to Route 95 in Richmond -- and by Monday morning it was gone.

"We consulted maps for property ownership, we know it was on private land," said Webb, who said the property belongs to resident Wilson Knerr, who gave them permission. "Shortly after we got there Sunday, a State Trooper pulled into the median like he usually does for a speed trap at that location.  He had to have tipped off the DOT."  Webb said come Monday morning, the sign was gone.  

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

A represenative at the Hopkinton DOT said that the sign had "clearly been on state property," and that the state had taken pictures before taking it down to document it.  

Charles St. Martin at the RI DOT said late Monday he would have to consult with staff members as to the location of the sign at the time of its move. 

"No sign, political or otherwise, can be placed by individuals on state land," said St. Martin. 

Interaction with DOT

Webb contends the sign was on private land. 

"I called the Hopkinton DOT on Monday after it was taken down,  I believe I spoke with the superintendent there," said Webb. "I explained it was private land, and we were well within our rights. From where I sit, the DOT erred in removing it.  Our name and website is clearly on the sign -- they could have called us. We're private citizens with a right to protest."

Webb provided a photo of another sign that is currently up in Wyoming to show what it looked like.  

Webb said he was told by the DOT that the sign was "out back by the dumpster," and he could go retrieve it.   "We plan on getting it -- that's our property," said Webb.  

The Gaspee Project, which is a partner and website host of the StopTollsRI.com group, weighed in on the situation on Monday.

"To have one group of public employees conspire with another group of public employees to thwart the constitutional rights of private citizens to voice their opinions, exemplifies precisely what is wrong with insider government in our state," said Ellen Kenner, Chairman of The Gaspee Project.

View Larger +

"This is a screen grab of Lot 6 owned by Wilson Knerr and the approximate location of our sign. It was about 20 feet from the white line of the breakdown lane," said Webb.

 

Related Slideshow: 10 Biggest Questions Facing Truck Tolls in RI

View Larger +
Prev Next

1.

Why won't the Governor define the proposal?


The Administration has put forth a number specifics that have changed since the original proposal, including the original “17-22” tolling locations changed to simply 17, and the reduction of toll amount from “$40-$50” to $30.  However, the Administration just got the green light last month by the Feds to move forward with the loosely-defined plan, which included inquiring as to whether the undersides of bridges could be tolled — which the Feds said now. 

Where will the tolls be located?  

Where had they been considering bridge undersides, and why? 

The loosely-defined plan has opened up the Administration to criticism that is moving to fast. 
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

2.

When will RI get the details?

The Senate approved an updated version of the truck toll plan last General Assembly session.  With no fall General Assembly session scheduled after much speculation, the lawmakers will ostensibly resume taking up the issue upon return in January or soon thereafter. 

Will a more detail proposal be made public prior to the new session, or will the nuts and bolds — and gantries — be kept under lock and key until they’re unveiled at a Finance Committee hearing?
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

3.

Does 80% of the $500 Million really only go to cover 6/10 Interchange?


The administration is proposing a $500 million revenue bond - and anticipating refinancing of federal debt as well as an influx of new federal funds - to provide the basis to cover costs for the project dubbed “RhodeWorks."

However, of that $500 million bond, $400 million of it would go to just one project - the much needed repairs on the crumbling 6-10 connector, which represents less than 1% of all state roads. 

Granted, not all of Rhode Island’s roads are in as dire condition at the 6/10 connector, but how much will the state have to spend — or bond — if $400 million goes to one project alone?
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

4.

Is RI stuck in a cycle for bonding?


With Rhode Island still smarting (will it ever not) from 38 Studios, the issue of a non-voter approved bond has taken on the appearance of a four-letter word. 

The Republican Policy Group has put forth a no-toll — and no-bonding plan, but the administration continues to make that case that despite the costs associated with bond debt, it will cost less for RI to pay for the projects now. 

In case you missed it, former Attorney General Arlene Violet wrote a scathing review of the state’s bonding industrial complex this week in the Valley Breeze, which is worth the read.  

View Larger +
Prev Next

5.

Will the General Assembly consider alternative proposals?


The Republicans have their no-toll, no-bond, pay-go proposal.  The Center for Freedom and Prosperity put forth a “P3” proposal for a public-private partnership.  The Trucking Association put forth their own no-toll plan, with increased fees and taxes instead to pay for the infrastructure costs. 

And State Rep. Doreen Costa has put forth a call to put any bond question before voters.  How much, if any, of these other approaches will see the light of day at the General Assembly?  The chances might be slim, but the opposition is vocal — and mobilized.  Don’t expect bond opponents to go anywhere anytime soon.  

View Larger +
Prev Next

6.

Can RI be assured it won't extend to autos?


The current proposal, as it sands, is to toll only trucks of a certain size — Class 8 to Class 13.  However, that doesn’t have Rhode Islands worried that in the event of revenue shortfalls, that the classifications could be expanded. 

Even if the Governor and General Assembly assured Rhode Islands that would never happen, there might be some discussion - and debate - around ensuring that’s the case.  Raimondo worked to increase the cigarette tax (already the third highest in the country) this past session.  The state’s revenue from gambling will continued to take a hit as competition from Massachusetts ramps up.  Could — or should — a stipulation be put in any legislation that if the toll plan is to be expanded, it would need to go before voters?
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

7.

Do recent projection shortfalls (Medicaid and rental tax)) call into questions revenue projections?


Raimondo had anticipated saving just over $70 million in Medicaid reform in this year’s budget, but the state’s Office of Health and Human Services said the number they were looking was almost two million short of that mark, and the the state’s revenue and caseload estimating conference pegged gap as even higher, as first reported by the Providence Journal. 

Most recently, WPRI noted that the rental home tax the Governor had touted fell $1 million short of expectations in the first month alone.  The administration is depending on a revenue stream of $60 million year, which leads us to our next question. 

View Larger +
Prev Next

8.

What happens if the state doesn't meet the revenue?

 
The projections put forth from the administration show that the state expects to collect $60 million a year from the tolls to pay for a thirty revenue bond.  This was after the administration shifted gears from a 15 year, $700 million bond that was depended on $100 million in revenue a year.  

The Republican Policy Group recently held a press conference on “missing inconvenient information,” at which is asserted that “half of the proposed tolls or $30 million comes from pass-through truckers, while the remaining half is paid by three sources: local trucks delivering out-of-state, instate/out-of-state trucks delivering in Rhode Island. 

However, the impact study projects only $12.79 million in additional cost from inbound traffic and $5 million from all local and outbound traffic. The figures don't add up. Approximately, $12 million in annual toll revenue is unaccounted for.”

Does it create a 38 Studios issue?

View Larger +
Prev Next

9.

What happens if trucks go around?

 
RI Trucking Association spokesperson Bill Fischer has questioned repeatedly what would happen if the trucks simply bypass the state.  

“We’d be on the hook for these bonds,” said Fischer. "We're saying charge us more in fees, focus on the diesel tax. We're worried about what no one has talked about, and that's evasion.  It's a big deal because you don't need to go through Rhode Island to drive from New York to Boston. We still have to make the bond payments.  These guys have computer programs that incorporate the fees and tolls.

The burden is being placed on the local guys." The Republican Policy Group has questioned whether diversion had been thoroughly vetted, as well. “Did the report account for diversion through Connecticut to avoid tolls as it relates to IFTA fees? Currently, truckers remit IFTA (International Fuel Tax Agreement) taxes to each state based on miles traveled. When they divert to avoid tolls, our state will lose these taxes.  What is the corresponding loss in revenue? 
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

10.

What if RI doesn't get matching funds?


As part of the overall project cost of just over $1 billion, $500 million would come from the revenue bond, $120 million would be achieved through existing bond refinancing, and $400 million is slated to come from the federal government for the 6-10 transit project.

Will that go by the wayside if the Feds don’t come through?  What will that mean for future projects?
 

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook