Could RI Progressives & Trump Team Up to Cleanup Lead in Providence Water?
Saturday, May 27, 2017
Now, Progressive Democrats are pushing for a infrastructure investment and jobs campaign that specifically addresses replacing lead pipes, which would include Rhode Island -- and demand specific stipulations for direct public investment.
Could funding set aside by Trump - and pressure from the Democrats -- help clean up lead in Providence's water?
Prov Water's Lead Issues
The Providence Water Supply Board warned customers in the summer of 2016 that it found elevated levels of lead in drinking water in some homes and buildings, and told customers "they might want to have their drinking water tested."
"I have always said this is an issue that people don't take seriously enough. The data are clear on the correlation between high lead and high crime," said progressive activist Sam Bell. "Rhode Island has high blood lead levels - and that's from lead in houses, soil, and in the water."
"Everyone talks about how to cut, not how to invest -- but there are high costs [associated with lead], from impacting education, increasing crime, and reducing economic output," said Bell. "We need to spend this money. We have no choice. We can't keep poisoning the children of Providence, I'm always surprised how blasé people are about the crisis."
In March, the Trump Administration announced $100 million to Flint, Michigan for water infrastructure upgrades under the EPA and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, which officials say will receive "robust funding" under the Trump budget proposal.
Pressure from Progressive Dems
"With elevated lead levels in Providence due to old water pipes: Democrats Kick Off Massive Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Campaign in Rhode Island & Congress," announced the grassroots Millions of Jobs Coalition along with Congressional Progressive Caucus members on Friday, unveiling 10 principles that they say "must be true of any jobs plan that passes into law."
The Progressive Democrats are pushing to ensure direct investment by the federal government -- and not privatization, which they say is at the heart of the Trump plan.
cited a recent Washington Post article that claimed Trump's proposal would have a net negative impact on infrastructure funding - which Trump officials refuted.
An analysis released by the office of Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), however, cites $206 billion in cuts to an array of existing infrastructure programs included in Trump’s budget document over the coming decade.
John Czwartacki, communications director for the Office of Management and Budget, said Schumer misunderstood the Trump administration's aims and unfairly characterized a major spending reduction.
“Senator Schumer is missing the point of the infrastructure initiative,” Czwartacki said. “Our budget intends to dedicate $200 billion in federal funding to improve infrastructure but also to re-engineer the way our programs work to maximize co-investment from state, local and private parties and ensure that we can stretch all those dollars further by eliminating red tape.”
The Congressional Progressive Caucus resolution, announced Thursday, put for 10 principles that they said "must be true of any jobs plan":
*Invest in creating millions of new jobs.
*Prioritize public investment over corporate giveaways and selling off public goods.
*Ensure that direct public investment provides the overwhelming majority of the funds for infrastructure improvement.
*Prioritize racial and gender equity, environmental justice, and worker protections.
*Embrace 21st century clean-energy jobs
*Protect wages, expand Buy American provisions, encourage project labor agreements, and prioritize the needs of disadvantaged communities -- both urban and rural.
*Ensure the wealthiest Americans and giant corporations who reap the greatest economic benefit from public goods pay their fair share for key investments.
*It must not be paid for at the expense of Social Security and other vital programs.
*It must not weaken or repeal existing rules and laws protecting our environment, worker safety. wages, or equity hiring practices.
*Prioritize resilient infrastructure that can withstand natural disasters and cyber or physical attacks
Bell said he would be concerned if privatization attempts resulting in a non-governmental corporation taking over Providence water -- which he said would harm efforts to clean up lead.
"If you have a private corporation, they won't address concerns like lead poisoning -- this is a big part of the reason why water privatization is dangerous," said Bell. "You need Democrats to hold people accountable. And especially when there's a natural monopoly it should not be privately owned. Every time it's been tried, it's been an unmitigated disaster.
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Forleo: Jail Trump, Not Reporters
- Whitcomb: “30% Chance Trump’s Impeached, 50% Chance PawSox Proposal’s Approved”
- Horowitz: Trump is Not a Victim
- Top RI Democrats React to the Trump Budget
- Horowitz: Trump Incompetently Abuses Power
- I Accept the Trump Kool-Aid: Guest MINDSETTER™ Wright
- Fecteau: Trump’s Miscalculation On the Comey Firing
- Trump is “Edging Towards Authoritarianism,” Says Brookings’ West
- RI’s Revenues Collapse: Raimondo Blames Trump, Mattiello Blames Raimondo: UPDATED
- Horowitz: Trump Has It Backwards on Releasing His Taxes
- Fecteau: Trump’s War Power; U.S. Military Operations in Syria Are Constitutional
- Fecteau: Deal or No Deal - Iran-Trump Edition
- Fecteau: U.S.’s Trump Card on North Korea
- Fecteau: The Stupidity of Trumped-up Tax Cuts
- Sunday Political Brunch—April 16, 2017: Trump Changing His Tune
- ABC6’s “In the Arena” Turns Into a Brawl Over Syria, Trump and Immigration
- Horowitz: Progress On Climate Change is Possible Despite Trump
- Newport Manners & Etiquette: Mrs. Trump’s Bad Table Manners, Weddings + More
- Trump “Has a Tweet Disease with the Attention Span of a Goldfish,” Says Leading French Journalist
- Whitcomb: Trump’s Admirable Decision; TV Land; Socializing the Risk
- Fecteau: Trump’s Embarrassing First-100 Days
- Horowitz: President Trump’s First 100 Days
- Fecteau: Trump’s House of Cards: Season One
- Top Progressives and Conservatives Debate the RI Economy
- RI Progressive Democrats Endorse 12 Candidates
- Moore: RI Progressives “Major in the Minors”
- Top RI Progressives Blast Raimondo for Choice of DNC Chair and Corporate Subsidies
- Fecteau: The Progressive Democrats’ Bubble
- RI Progressives Call Out Whitehouse’s “Hypocrisy” on Vote for Trump CIA Pick
- Elorza’s Stance on Immigration Called “Lip Service” by Progressive Labor Leader
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Stewart: Local Progressives Aiming Gun at Own Foot, Will They Pull Trigger?
- Progressive Dems’ Bell Questions Raimondo’s Failure to Report In-Kind Contribution
- Moore: Will Mattiello Appease Progressives?
- It’s All About Education: Why So Many Choose Progressive Education
- Riley: Progressive Magaziner and the Discount Rate
- Fecteau: The Myth of Rhode Island’s Progressive Democrat Problem
- Progressive Dems Release Elorza’s Campaign Promises on TSAs
- Progressive Democrats Target 15 General Assembly Seats in RI
- Carol Anne Costa: A Progressive by Any Other Name…
- Progressive Democrats Of Rhode Island Endorse Clay Pell for Governor
- 2 RI Progressives Take on National Democratic Superdelegate Structure
- RI Progressive Dems Call on Clinton to Remove “Deeply Unpopular” Raimondo as Co-Chair
- Ethics Complaint Filed Against Rep. DeSimone by Progressive Dems
- Moore: Progressives Are Being Disingenuous
- Travis Rowley: Progressives: Liars By Religion and Trade
- Hinckley: Why Progressives Hate Entrepreneurs + Business Owners
- Top Nat’l & Regional Progressives and Conservatives Debate at URI
- “Crazier than Watergate” - Whitcomb on Trump, Comey, and More