Don Roach: 38 Studios Was Never a Good Investment
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Well, that was quick. GoLocal reported yesterday that 38 Studios, the video game company owned by Curt Schilling, may be having financial problems. Is anyone surprised? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that video game makers come and go like the wind. One day a video game maker might have the hottest selling game on the market and the next day they are just another relic. The video game industry isn’t kind to the last great thing and quite frankly, like the movies, many expensive endeavors never meet their lofty expectation.

I’d like to cover the reasons why giving $75 million dollars to this company was a bad idea. Regardless of how this ends up, and trust me RI Taxpayers want 38 Studios to succeed, this was a bad deal for Rhode Island.
Never, ever put all your eggs in one basket.
The main problem with giving $75 million to one company is the fact that the EDC gave too much money to one company. Let’s imagine if the EDC gave $5 million to 15 different companies and one of them defaulted on their payments back to the EDC. Well, there’s still 14 other companies that are making their payments on time and also contributing to the economic health of Rhode Island.
Not so with this $75 million deal. Instead, Rhode Island is heavily dependent upon this company succeeding and fulfilling its potential to bring jobs and a return on the $75 million dollar loan. If it fails, it taxpayers foot the bill.
The deal was a big F-U to small businesses.
I’m not one to curse but how else would you feel as a small business owner or a would-be small business owner? Essentially, Curt Schilling spoke to former Governor Don Carcieri and asked him if Rhode Island was willing to do a deal to bring his company to Rhode Island. I won’t fault Carcieri for making a move to bring Schilling’s company to Rhode Island, but I will fault the perception of a sweet heart deal it left with Rhode Islanders looking to expand or enter into a new business.
During a time when unemployment was rampant the Governor and EDC Direct Keith Stokes needed to make a deal that would jumpstart the economy and inspire confidence in the average Rhode Islander. This certainly didn’t do the latter and that was a mistake – a very big mistake.
Schilling’s name does not equate profits.
If I came to Governor Carcieri back then with the same deal, I doubt the state would have given me $75 million if I had the exact same deal. But, since it was Curt Schilling, baseball hero, there was a legitimacy with his business venture that was not wholly deserved. Again, I’m not saying that 38 Studios will fail, but I am saying that simply because Schilling is associated with the company does not mean it will be more or less successful than other business ventures the EDC was reviewing at the time. The EDC made a serious miscalculation when approving this deal because of the cache that comes with Schilling being a part of this company.
Deal proves business climate in Rhode Island “sucks”
If we need to loan a company $75 million dollars just to come to Rhode Island how bad is the business climate in Rhode Island? Wait, don’t answer that because by the fact that we loaned a company $75 million to move their business here – aka we paid them to provide jobs – means the climate is horrible. I shouldn’t have to tell you that Rhode Island ranks as one of the worst states for business. Just google “Rhode Island business climate ranking” and you’ll find a report from RIPEC which found:
A review of five business climate ranking studies indicates that Rhode Island is not perceived as a good place to start or grow a business. Four of the five studies – two from research organizations (The Tax Foundation and the Small Business and Entrepreneurship (SBE) Council) and three by media outlets (Forbes, CNBC and Chief Executive – ranked the Ocean State’s business climate in the bottom ten in the country. RIPEC examined the five reports and found that the state consistently performed poorly with regards to its tax and regulatory environment, cost of doing business, transportation infrastructure and economy.
Surprised?
I’m not. While this deal has brought a few hundred jobs to Rhode Island are we going to have to loan a business a few hundred thousand dollars for every job they bring to Rhode Island? Seriously? This deal did not better the business climate in Rhode Island, it just showed the rest of the country how bad it is.
Depressing.
What else do we need to tell us this deal was bad?
There really isn’t much else to say other than this was a bad deal for Rhode Island. You knew it, I knew it, and John Robitaille knew it. We’re here now and 38 Studios failing so soon after its launch in Rhode Island cannot happen. Now, we’re faced with the situation of coming up with tricky financing solutions to help the company through its cash flow problems. Sound familiar fellow taxpayer? AIG, bailout, and stimulus packages come to mind.
I’ll leave you with this – can we have a week where we get some good economic news, Rhode Island?
Don Roach is a member of the RI Young Republicans. He can be reached at don@donroach.org.
Related Articles
- Don Roach: 2nd Place a Win in New Hampshire
- Don Roach: 5 Reasons Conservatives Don’t Trust Romney
- Don Roach: 5 Reasons Taxing the Rich is Stupid
- Don Roach: 5 Things to Watch for in 2012
- Don Roach: After Iowa, What Next?
- Don Roach: Allan Fung Needs to be RI’s Next Governor
- Don Roach: Angel Taveras is Losing His Shine
- Don Roach: Black People are Getting Lost in the American Shuffle
- Don Roach: Brendan Doherty Needs to Up His Game
- Don Roach: David Cicilline Ruined Providence
- Don Roach: Just Say No to In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants
- Don Roach: MLK’s legacy is More than Just a Holiday
- Don Roach: Newt Fights Back in South Carolina
- Don Roach: Newt Gingrich – Your Next U.S. President



Comments:
Peter Cassels
7:30am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Don, I agree on every one of your points. Carcieri pushed the deal and ignored the first warning sign: Schilling came to RI because Massachusetts wouldn't give him any funding.
Bob Washburn
9:34am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Don, thank you for writing this great article. I disagree with one point - funding small companies. Businesses need investment, but not from government. We don't need a bunch of little 38 Studios or Solyndras.
Seed investments for early stage companies are supposed to be provided from friends, families and fools, then angel investors, then venture capitalists, in increasing amounts as companies prove their worth. Notice... no government.
Todd B
11:21am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
"I won’t fault Carcieri for making a move to bring Schilling’s company to Rhode Island..."
I agreed with much of what you said up until this point. It was the job of Carcieri, Fox and Paiva-Weed to commit taxpayer funds wisely. They not only failed in the job, they circumvented to original intent of the Jobs Guaranty Act in the process. The original point of the Act was to provide already growing companies loans so that they could expedite their growth. It was not to fund start-ups that had already blown through a bunch of cash with nothing to show for it. Carcieri took funds from what should have been a low-risk program and committed them to a high-risk opportunity that had been vetted and rejected by private sector investors.
Todd B
11:29am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Also, I read the link on the WPRI website. While Robitaille is claiming he was against the deal today, he is listed as being the only one of the four gubernatorial candidates (himself, Raimond, Chafee and Caprio) who supported the deal, even though he had reservations.
So who showed the worst judgement and leadership: Carcieri who ignored the warning signs and invested out of a genuine but misguided belief in 38 Studios or Robitaille who didn't believe in the project but supported it anyway so as not to alienate Carcieri?
Benjamin Algeo
1:57pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Bob has it right - the only reason missing, and the only one that matters, is that government has no place investing in private businesses, period.
E.J. Dunn
4:35pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Good column, Don. Right on the money, of lack thereof.
Massachusetts rejected 38 Studios' pleas, as did the savvy venture capitalists of Silicon Valley.
So what's an ex-athlete with zero business experience to do? Why, visit the starstruck rubes next door, in the state with a god-awful business climate.
The rubes, as if on cue, were only too happy to throw $75 million at Big Schill.
This would be hilarious -- if it were not so sad and pathetic.
Donn Roach
9:13pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Bob & Benjamin - you make a good point about government getting involved with private business. This situation is probably support for why government and private enterprise should be as separate as church and state.
- Don
PO Taxpayer
1:15am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Wow ... let the revisionist history begin ... I had the opportunity to debate Mr. Robataille a number of times as he made his way across the talk radio landscape ... He was an open advocate of the deal, and derided folks like myself as "too negative" (Where else have we heard that?) Quite frankly, the entire conservative media was in the bag for this one .... Would love to see a reprint of any comments you had Don, opposing this fiasco ... I seem to forget the episode where you chained yourself to the State House Door, and said No No!
Jim D
9:46am on Thursday, May 17, 2012
They must have been in financial trouble when they were looking for money a couple of years ago.
The State didn't even put someone on the Board of Directors so they would know what's going on.
Someone got paid off to make this deal the same way there were payoffs to jam DeepWater down our throats. They both happened on Carcieri's clock.
E.J. Dunn
7:26pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012
Rhode Island: the Circling the Drain State.
Donna Day
3:07pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012
Don
WHAT IS YOUR POSITION ON PAYING OFF THE BOND HOLDERS??
LEGALLY WE ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO DO SO1
I KEEP HEARING "MORALLY WE SHOULD.
Donna Day
3:10pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012
Don
WHAT IS YOUR POSITION ON PAYING OFF THE BOND HOLDERS??
LEGALLY WE ARE NOT OBLIGATED TO DO SO.
As You so well stated Big Risks involved just like the movies.
I KEEP HEARING "MORALLY" WE SHOULD.
What do you say?
Jim D
3:50pm on Sunday, May 27, 2012
The State guaranteed the bonds would be paid off.