Moore: Raimondo is Not Wrong to Hire Out-of-State Vendors
Monday, April 11, 2016
There's no doubt about it. The fact that an out-of-state firm coined "cooler and warmer" helped contribute to the uproar over Slogangate.
It makes sense at first blush. Let's face it: the state has an endless supply of marketing and public relations firms.
To make matters worse, Providence tries to market itself as "The Creative Capital". When the state hires an outside firm to devise a slogan and logo, it weakens the city's slogan.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTSlogangate
That's why it must have irked Rhode Islanders last week when GoLocal reported that during the first nine months of the 2015-2016 fiscal year, out-of-state vendors received contracts for roughly $524 million. That's about 48-percent of the money spent on contracts or payments to vendors.
The state's economy is still lagging. So many believe it would benefit us to keep the money local.
In this case, I have to disagree.
Simply put: that's not always the best way to do business. Don't get me wrong, if two companies bid for the same contract and charge a similar amount of money and are equally qualified, then it should stay local.
But state contracts aren't intended to be a stimulus package. Nor should they be. Instead, they're intended to perform a specific purpose in the most cost-effective manner possible.
Not a Stimulus Package
What happens when an out-of-state company bids millions of dollars less than an in-state company? It would be the height of fiscal irresponsibility to select the in-state company just because they're local.
The taxpayers deserve to see their money expended in the most economical manner possible. The money saved by going out-of-state could be spent on more services. Or, the savings could lower our taxes.
That was the case when the state decided to award its health care contract to United Health Care. The state saved about $5.5 million when it re-upped the contract with United in 2007 . It also stipulated that local communities could capitalize on the savings by following suit.
Major Savings
One of the more frustrating moments I have ever encountered covering municipal government was back in 2008 when the Warwick City Council opted to leave roughly $1 million in savings on the table by neglecting to piggy back on the state contract. Naturally, Blue Cross argued that they offered more savings. But a neutral health care consultant affirmed United's assessment.
That RI health care contract accounts for the largest out-of-state expenditure. It amounted to $134 over the first nine months of the current fiscal year.
None of this is to say that there aren't some questionable out-of-state contracts. The state paid roughly $10 million dollars over the first 9 months of the fiscal year to bond underwriter Wells Fargo Securities. The SEC has charged that company with defrauding investors in the 38 Studios bond offering. Given the severity of those charges it doesn't make sense, on principal alone, for the the state to do business with Well Fargo.
Reasonable Suggestions
And Dr. Ed Mazze, the former Dean of the University of Rhode Island’s Business School, makes some excellent points about how the state could make it easier for smaller, Rhode Island based companies to bid and win state business. The state should make the bidding process more transparent and simpler. Businesses who lose out on the bidding process should be made aware why. And the state purchasing department should do more outreach to local business.
But the state should never hire a more expensive company or less qualified company just because they're located in Rhode Island. At the end of the day, the government needs make sure that the taxpayer's money gets spent as efficiently as possible.
That's why I don't fault Raimondo for spending money on out-of-state firms.
Russell Moore has worked on both sides of the desk in Rhode Island media, both for newspapers and on political campaigns. Send him email at [email protected] Follow him on twitter @russmoore713.
Related Slideshow: Raimondo’s Tourism Problems Are Far From Over
Related Articles
- Moore: My RI Christmas Wish List
- Moore: Fix the 6-10 Connector For Freedom’s Sake
- Moore: Relocation Expert Says RI Can Lure GE
- Moore: Rhode Island Needs a Holiday!
- Moore: End Providence Pension Spiking
- Moore: Bring Back The Dancing Cop
- Moore: Elorza’s Demotion of Fire Chief is a Head-Scratcher
- Moore: Was Chafee’s Presidential Bid Successful?
- Moore: Toll Plan Will Radically Restructure RI Borrowing
- Moore: Elorza, Firefighters Must Reach Settlement on Platoon Shift
- Moore: Statewide Teacher Contract Will Benefit RI
- Moore: Unlike RI, Puerto Rico Takes on Ratings Agencies
- Moore: GE Decision Shows RI Must Be Business Friendly
- Moore: Trump and Sanders Appeal to the Disenfranchised
- Moore: Mount Saint Charles Sends The Wrong Message
- Moore: Apple’s Prudent Resistance to FBI Overreach
- Moore: Deep-Seated Issues in the Elorza Administration Arise
- Moore: Marketing Fiasco Symbolizes RI Government Dysfunction
- Moore: Providence’s Commercial Tax Conundrum
- Moore: Time To Legalize Marijuana
- Moore: Brookings Recommendations Would Be Costly
- Moore: “Rhode Island is Famous For You,” Buddy
- Moore: Fitch’s Providence Downgrade is Overdue
- Moore: Fetishes and LSD - Raimondo’s Controversial Appointments