Guest MINDSETTER™ Tony Jones: Flawed Polling for Presidential Debate Inclusion
Sunday, September 18, 2016
This coming fall you and I (and every person in all 50 states and Washington DC) will have the opportunity to vote for Gary Johnson in our state and as such I think that it's very important that we get a chance to see him in the nation debates along with the Republican and Democrat candidate.
Currently the Congressional Debate Commission is using a standard of being over 15% in the polls, but that is a very flawed metric. The question that is asked is "If the election were held today, who would you vote for?"
That question is DESIGNED to not have people answer "I don't know yet" and it punishes any "new" candidate if their party does not have an established base of voters who always vote the party ticket. The question is designed to not allow people to answer "I want to know more about them and make an informed decision." Why is asking people who they would vote for RIGHT THIS SECOND considered a good way to determine who should be in the debates to inform the public? Why is the poll question trying remove the influence of the people who want to make an informed decision BASED on the debates.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTSimilarly, if 100 people are polled and 10 of them respond that they don't know who they are voting for yet, those votes are not counted as supporting Gary Johnson specifically, even those people have specifically said they are not convinced to vote for the Republican or the Democrat.
The polls should not be asking people who they would vote for. The poll question that determines who should be in the debates should read as follow: "The following candidates will be on the ballot for President in your state. Please indicate all of them that you would like to see in the debate." It's very simple -- if a poll is being used to determine who is in the debates, that poll should ask about the debates.
When that question is asked, 76% of Americans respond that they would like to see Gary Johnson in the debate.
Count me among that 76%.
Tony Jones, Libertarian Candidate for North Kingstown Town Council / RI State Director Johnson/Weld 2016
Related Articles
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Sen. Sheehan: Passage of Ethics Reform is Great News for RI
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Rob Goldman: Sanders’ Fight Far From Being Over
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: Elorza Leading Charge Against the PFD
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Regunberg: A Way Forward on Solitary Confinement Reform
- Guest MINDSETTER™ DiPalma & Bann: Rhode Islanders Can be Proud of Children’s Health Improvements
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Speaker Mattiello: Sustained Effort Will Make us Stronger
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: The PFD Post Incident Report
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Sasse: Unlocking Opportunity By Reinventing The War On Poverty
- “The Raymond Rembrandt” - Guest MINDSETTER™ Anthony Amore
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: Pare’s Abuse of Power
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Rep. Serpa: House Oversight Seeks More Efficient State Government
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: PFD Organizational Chart
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Ajello: Why I Voted Against the “Revenge Porn” Bill
- Guest Mindsetter™ Morse: Panhandling Reality Check
- Guest Mindsetter™ Dr. Carriuolo: How Commerce Corp is Making RI More Business Friendly
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: Elorza’s Incompetence
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Bilotta: Educating the Community is the Key to Combating Addiction
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Rich Pezzillo: Kennedy Plaza’s Neighbors, A Community for Change
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Lawton: Mattiello is Steering State Down Dangerous Road
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Maciel: A Proposal to Help Improve Our Local Economy
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Rep. Morgan: Rhode Islanders Deserve Better
- Renewable Energy vs. Journal’s Censorship, Guest MINDSETTER™ Seth Handy
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: All Lives Matter
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Kenneth Dulgarian: Memo to Mayor Elorza
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Tom Kenney: Tentative Agreement
