Fecteau: About Clinton’s Damn Emails
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
The email controversy plaguing Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign reached a fever pitch on the debate stage last October. Clinton’s democratic rival for president, US Senator Bernie Sanders, became so disgusted he openly declared he was sick of hearing about her “damn emails.” I agree, and you should too.
This email boondoggle arose from the half-baked litany of futile, yet expensive G.O.P.-led Benghazi investigations. These politically motivated investigations revealed then-Secretary of State Clinton’s used a private email server during her tenure (if it sounds pretty boring, that’s because it is). And like losers smugly holding up their participation trophy in triumph, the Republicans shamelessly showcased their meager findings for all the world to see.
This preposterous email controversy continues to hound Clinton’s campaign to this day; thanks due to Republican posturing. It does sound unscrupulous, a person in power, abusing the rules, but looking closer; past the sleazy talking points and cheap demagoguery, this issue barely registers on the scandal Richter scale.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTLet’s be honest; the use of a private server wasn’t the best idea. Some emails on Clinton’s server contained information that could be deemed classified, secret, and top secret, but without the respective markings. Though, in the era of over classification, hardly an unpardonable sin. Also, thousands of emails were classified after the fact – many people forget that part.
The emails already classified at the time they were delivered are most concerning. These emails contained categorized markings (not in the header per policy), and were being stored in a server outside of government control. After being interviewed by the FBI, Clinton -- who didn’t receive any formal security training – said she likely didn’t know the classification level per the designation on the email subject line, and didn’t know of the prohibition to use a private server. This was ruled a State Department communication issue, not deliberate neglect.
In addition, the use of a personal email server has some precedent. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell also used a similar email server to conduct official business. In fact, Powell recommended then-Secretary of State Clinton use a private server to keep in touch with friends and employees. Yet, why no G.O.P-led calls for an investigation of his affairs? Where is the condemnation? Oh yeah, Powell served under a Republican president.
Some parallels have been drawn to the case of then-CIA director David Petraeus, and his handling of classified information. While director of the CIA, Petraeus intentionally provided his mistress classified intelligence. Eventually, after a thorough investigation, Petraeus pled guilty to one count of mishandling classified information.
This comparison is somewhat misleading. Petraeus deliberately provided classified materials to his mistress. Clinton certainly didn’t intentionally turn over classified information to a third party. This is a point that needs to be emphasized more often.
Clinton’s critics argue she should be charged with a crime, but there has to be a crime allegedly committed in the first place. Unlike the case with Petraeus, Mrs. Clinton’s peccadillos did not warrant a criminal charge, that has been proven. Both the FBI’s and the State Department’s independent review found no evidence that there was any wrongdoing. It should be noted, her actions were found to have violated only the State Department’s arcane and antiquated policy, never anything against the law.
Clinton demonstrated bad judgement and heeded flawed advice, but that certainly doesn’t make her a criminal; this should be banished to a mere footnote in the history books. Let’s move on to a substantive conversation focusing on the issues such as who should have their finger on the button of our nuclear arsenal.
Matt Fecteau ([email protected]) of Pawtucket, Rhode Island lost to state Senator Jamie Doyle in 2016’s Democratic primary. He is a former White House national security intern and Iraq war veteran.
Related Articles
- Fecteau: Back to Iraq
- Fecteau: Chafee’s Idiotic Decision and the Absurdity of RI Politics
- Fecteau: A Deployed Veteran’s Reflection
- Fecteau: Should RI Still Host the Syrian Refugees? Absolutely
- Matt Fecteau: Playing into the Islamic State’s Hands
- Fecteau: The Myth of Rhode Island’s Progressive Democrat Problem
- Fecteau: Until We Act on Gun Violence, Expect More Ungodly Death
- Fecteau: Does Obama’s Foreign Policy Jeopardize Our National Security?
- Fecteau: Is Obama or Bush to blame for the Rise of Islamic State?
- Fecteau: An American Soldier’s Hope for Rhode Island
- Fecteau: Want to Help Save Rhode Island? Demand More Syrian Refugees
- Matt Fecteau: Close the Gun Show Loophole
- Matt Fecteau: Oil Prices Alone Are Not Killing Your 401(k)
- Fecteau: Why Doesn’t President Obama Say Radical Islam?
- Fecteau: A Morbid Milestone
- Fecteau: Orlando Was Just the Beginning
- Meet the Candidates: Matt Fecteau
- Matt Fecteau: Rhode Island’s Primary Problem
- Fecteau: Biden is Wrong on Rhodeworks
- Fecteau: RI Democratic Party State Chair McNamara Should Resign
- Matt Fecteau: Honoring “Buddy” Cianci’s Legacy
- Matt Fecteau: Dear Trump Supporters, This isn’t a Reality TV Show
- Fecteau: Does State Rep. Macbeth Stand A Chance Against Cicilline? No With Caveats
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Russell Taub: Matt Fecteau Misses an Important Point
- Fecteau: Clinton’s Millennial Mess