U.S. Court of Appeals Upholds Suspension of Witness Requirement for Mail Voting in RI
Saturday, August 08, 2020
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit unanimously upheld the implementation of a consent agreement suspending Rhode Island’s witness/notary requirements for voting by mail in the September and November elections.
“Taking an unusual and in fact unnecessary chance with your life is a heavy burden to bear simply to vote,” the court wrote in its 12-page decision refusing to issue a stay of the agreement pending any further appeals.
“[This] is another victory for voting rights and the safety of Rhode Islanders," said Rhode Island Secretary of State Neellie Gorbea. "I thank the United States Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit for upholding the removal of Rhode Island’s burdensome requirement that voters obtain two witnesses or a notary to vote by mail during the pandemic, and for delivering this decision in a timely manner."
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST"No one should have to choose between their health and their constitutional right to vote. I will always fight to ensure all Rhode Islanders can vote safely and securely," Gorbea added."
About Decision
The decision came in a lawsuit filed two weeks ago by attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Rhode Island, the Campaign Legal Center, and the law firm Fried Frank. The suit sought to block provisions of a state law that require Rhode Islanders who vote by mail to have two witnesses or a notary sign their ballot envelope, even in the midst of a highly contagious and deadly pandemic. These requirements necessitate face-to-face and hand-to-hand interaction between voters and others who pose a potentially fatal risk to the voters’ health.
The case was filed on behalf of two voting rights advocacy groups — Common Cause Rhode Island and the League of Women Voters of Rhode Island — and three voters with significant medical vulnerabilities that place them or members of their household at a heightened risk of severe illness or death if they contract COVID-19.
“We are gratified the Court of Appeals agreed that Rhode Island voters should not be forced to choose between their health and their constitutional right to vote. The decision demonstrates once again that the Courts and the Constitution remain the only bulwarks against political inaction and partisan calculationm," said Michael Keats, an ACLU cooperating attorney from the law firm of Fried Frank who argued the case.
Last week, the plaintiffs and the defendants in the case – the Secretary of State and the Board of Elections – submitted a consent agreement to suspend the witness/notary requirement, which was approved by U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy. The Republican Party of Rhode Island and the Republican National Committee then appealed that decision to the Court of Appeals in Boston, asking that enforcement of the consent agreed be stayed, leading to tonight’s decision. The three-judge panel unanimously denied the request, calling the Party’s fear of voter fraud “dubious as a matter of fact and reality,” and noting the position of elections officials in support of suspending the requirement.
Related Articles
- RI Curfews Come Under Criticism for Potential of Voting Interference and Discrimination
- NEW: RI Voting Issues Draw Outrage from Voters, Defense from Secretary of State Gorbea
- RI to Vote on Removing Providence Plantations From State’s Name
- NEW: Trump Ponders Delaying Election, RI Secretary of State Gorbea Fires Back
- RI Secretary of State Gorbea Elected to National Election Security Leadership Position
- Gorbea Announces Launch of New Voter Registration System
- Sorry, Mr. President, Election Day Will Remain Nov. 3 - Rob Horowitz
- Giving the Election Back to Trump: Kenney
