One of the Greatest Living Rhode Islanders Is Turning 100 and Has a Lot to Say in a New Book

GoLocalProv News Team

One of the Greatest Living Rhode Islanders Is Turning 100 and Has a Lot to Say in a New Book

Rhode Islander and former US Secretary of the Navy J. William Middendorf PHOTO: Courtesy of Middendorf
Former United States Ambassador and Secretary of Navy J. William Middendorf, II, is nearly 100 years old, and he is never out of the news.

Now, he has written a new book warning about the significant threats to America.

In recent months, Middendorf made national news on the issue of offshore wind, and the United States Navy held a ceremony in December celebrating the keel plate unveiling for one of the Navy’s future Arleigh Burke Class Flight III destroyers to be named for Middendorf.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

At that ceremony, the Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, made remarks and specifically cited the threat of China to America.

“The People’s Republic of China is our pacing challenge, and we must restore our Nation’s maritime power to meet it,” said Secretary Del Toro. “The future USS J. William Middendorf is key to that goal. We look forward to welcoming her into our fleet and are excited for its future crew to represent our nation on a global scale, just as her namesake did throughout his life.”

The comments by Secretary Del Toro were highly relevant to Middendorf’s book.

His new book, “On My 100-Year Watch,” is now taking preorders. GoLocal was able to review the final transcript of the publication.

Middendorf’s book is an effort to reflect on critical global issues that he was directly involved with and extract critical learnings to help guide America’s future. 

He lives in Little Compton and has been active in Republican politics in Rhode Island.

Middendorf specifically cites five examples of malfeasance by American decision-makers — failures that have cost the United States dearly.

 

Middendorf as U.S. Ambassador to Netherlands PHOTO: CC: 3.0 Eric Koch / Anefo - Nationaal Archief
The Failure in China and the Long-Term Threat

The first example cited by Middendorf is what he says has been the failure of the United States to understand the threat of Mao Zedong after World War II.

Middendorf, then in his early 20s, was stationed in China and saw firsthand the decisions of General George C. Martin.

“I witnessed the first of six revolutions that have rocked the world. In 1945, my ship was stationed in China as part of the occupation force, and I observed first-hand the beginning of the Communist takeover. General George Marshall was sent by President Truman to China in 1945 to adjudicate between Nationalist Chiang Kai-shek and Communist Mao Zedong,” writes Middendorf.

“People believed in the Chinese Communist party because it promised to protect human rights and distribute land to the peasants. It pledged that control of industrial production would be in the hands of the working class and profits would be divided equally among its members. It used its support among workers, peasants, and a large group of intellectuals, some of whom I got to know during my tour in China. Mao referred to the intellectuals who supported his Revolution as 'useful idiots,' and most of them were executed or imprisoned. Mao also took away their work, homes, belongings, and freedom. Food was distributed according to merit, becoming a weapon to force people to follow the party’s every dictate. As incentives to work were removed, coercion and violence were used to compel famished farmers to perform labor on poorly planned irrigation projects while fields were neglected,” writes Middendorf.

In the phone interview, Middendorf blamed the State Department’s George Atcheson — citing that he called Mao the "George Washington of the Pacific.”

“Who lost China to the Communists? Marshall’s decision to withhold arms shipments from the Nationalists during a critical junction of the War played a major role. President Truman and a Congress that turned its back on the Nationalists must also share in the blame. General Stillwell never tried to hide his dislike for Chiang Kai-shek, and he shared his views with General Marshall. George Atcheson Jr., head of our State Department in China, described Mao as 'the George Washington of the Pacific.' Another State Department employee, John Servant, admitted to giving critical battle plans to the Communists,” writes Middendorf.

Middendorf says the United States made a fatal error, “Marshall made a decision that some say led to the collapse of the Nationalist government. After more than a year of negotiations, Marshall achieved no significant agreements. Still, the net effect was to weaken the Nationalists when, in an attempt to broker a ceasefire, he recommended that the sale of weapons and ammunition the United States had been making to the Nationalists be suspended between July 1946 and May 1947. I still remember the shock I shared with fellow officers when the arms embargo was announced. A year later, Congress recognized the mistake and rushed aid to the Nationals, but it was too late, and China fell to the Communists in 1949."

 

At a Naval Ceremony, Middendorf's career in government and business has spanned 75 years PHOTO: US Navy CC:3.0
Critical Failures in 9/11 and What We Can Learn

Middendorf, an old-school conservative but not a MAGA Trumpite, makes it clear that the United States too often sees emerging revolutionaries as reformers. He cites Fidel Castro in Cuba, Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua, and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela as others who promised reform but delivered poverty and corruption.

Middendorf discusses the critical failures leading up to 9/11.

He writes, "In 2002, President George W. Bush appointed Thomas Kean, a former Republican governor of New Jersey, and Lee Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana, to head an investigation. The commission made 41 recommendations on homeland security, emergency response, congressional reform, and foreign policy. For Kean, perhaps the most important one mandated intelligence sharing to prevent further terrorist attacks—the most significant intelligence reform in U.S. history."

"Kean explained: 'If the FBI and the CIA and 14 other intelligence agencies had been talking to each other, most of us feel that the attack could have been prevented. We reorganized the whole intelligence apparatus, so instead of several agencies, there’s now one head—the director of national intelligence— and then people from the various agencies meet together and share information.'”

Middendorf writes, "Kean’s comment reminded me of a temporary post I had 22 years earlier as the interim head of the CIA Transition Team. As the 1980 election campaign gained momentum, I provided policy assistance to Governor Reagan as chairman of the International Economic Advisory Committee and the Naval Advisory Committee. I also chaired the Finance Committee for the inauguration. Soon after the election, Reagan offered me a new but temporary challenge: to head the CIA Transition Team. This is one of those invisible tools of our government, where an incoming administration sends representatives to meet with the leadership and examine the current policies of federal programs and agencies and recommend changes in policy or operation."

"However, the CIA rejected most of our recommendations, including policy changes that would have encouraged information sharing between the CIA and FBI and might have prevented 9/11," Middendorf writes.

Regardless of one's politics, Middendorf's book, written with Ken Dooley, is a remarkable journey through American policy. 

At nearly 100, Middendorf in his new book reminds readers of the importance of public service and vigorous and respectful public discourse.


The 50 Greatest Living Rhode Islanders

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.