Jones Lang LaSalle -- one of the leading real estate advisory firms in the United States -- in a letter to Commerce RI’s law firm wrote that the Superman rehabilitation project would not be viable without taxpayer support.
“It is our conclusion that the planned redevelopment of 111 Westminster Street cannot be achieved on a purely privately financed basis. The successful completion of the Project will require public sector financial support,” according to the letter signed by Jones Lang LaSalle’s managing partner of the New York office, Michael Shenot.
Shenot's "primary focus is on strategic advisory work for large institutional clients. He also acts as JLL’s relationship manager for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey account, providing a range of real estate advisory services in support of the agency’s redevelopment of the World Trade Center complex,” according to his firm bio.
Jones Lang LaSalle was engaged by Commerce RI's law firm Savage Law Partners, LLP.
Despite repeated requests, Commerce RI did not provide a copy of the engagement letter between Savage Law Partners, LLP and Jones Lang LaSalle regarding the scope of work and the fee.
The Jones Lang LaSalle letter further states, “The financial support from public sector capital sources is necessary due to several factors, including the current development cost premiums experienced in the construction marketplace. It is our experience that the cost premiums anticipated in the redevelopment of 111 Westminster Street are similar and comparable to project cost data we have seen in our work on other conversions of a historic commercial office building into a modern multi-family residential assets in urban centers in the Northeastern United States. Construction cost inflation has been particularly strong over the past 6 quarters and this data has been factored into our review.”
The deal announced by state officials on Tuesday committed federal, state and Providence incentives that total about $90 million. The total project cost was announced at $223 million based on the construction cost of approximately $300/square foot — an estimate that has been widely criticized as being too low.
"We have also completed a full review of the Project construction budget. This review evaluated the full development cost projection, including hard costs, soft costs, financing fees, and other third-party costs. This budget was evaluated against several comparable projects we have participated in over the past 2-3 years. Our comparable set was focused on projects that involved the conversion of historic commercial office building in downtown urban settings to multi-family residential projects. Our conclusion is that the Developer’s financial assumptions are sound," writes Shenot.
"Our review also included an exploration of the market conditions for project finance. We evaluated the Developer’s ability to raise private capital to complete the Project in light of current market conditions. We have also been asked to opine on the appropriate level of private capital reasonably available to the Developer of the Project and the structure of public sector financial assistance necessary to finance the Project. This effort has assisted the Department of Commerce in establishing a financial structure that rationally apportions project risk, project financial returns, and operational flexibility to the appropriate party," adds Shenot.
Commerce RI has refused to release other documents requested by GoLocal -- specifically, the pro forma -- the underlying financial model -- for the project
A letter from Commerce RI's law firm denied GoLocal's request for a series of documents.
"This letter is written in response to your April 13, 2022 request for public records made to the Corporation pursuant to the Access to Public Records Act (R.I. Gen. Laws § 38-2-1 et seq., “APRA”)," wrote Christopher J. Fragomeni, Esq. in response to GoLocal's request. "In particular, you requested the following:
Will the state or Sweetsor present for public review an economic impact analysis to show benefits to the public? Please provide a copy.
The term sheet appears to be missing a schedule, time frame, dates, etc-is that in another document, and can we have a copy?
Has the state received a 20-year pro forma that shows all assumptions regarding itemized construction costs, cost of money from lenders, rents and fees, and other income to show how the deal will pencil out? Please provide a copy."
"Please be advised that, at this time, the Corporation is withholding any economic impact analysis in its entirety pursuant to the exemption in APRA for “[p]reliminary drafts, notes, impressions, memoranda, working papers, and work products,” wrote Fragomeni.
He added, "'The Corporation is not in possession of a document with any “schedule, time frame, dates, etc.' Lastly, any proformas received from the developer are being withheld in their entirety pursuant to the exemptions in APRA for '[t]rade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person, firm, or corporation that is of a privileged or confidential nature'; and 'r]eports and statements of strategy or negotiation with respect to the investment or borrowing of public funds, until such time as those transactions are entered into.'"
Related Slideshow: 7 Things to Know About Superman Building and Deal Being Proposed
The framework provides that taxpayers will provide:
Providence tax stabilization agreement (TSA) will provide tens of millions in subsidies for the project. Potentially, as much as $30 million depending on the final project costs and the length of the TSA.
In addition, Providence is providing $5 million in subsidy and another $10M in a low-interest loan (1% interest rate)
The state through a series of funding sources in part in an attempt to avoid legislative approval or a direct subsidy has proposed:
$15M Rebuild RI Tax Credit
$5.7M First Wave Closing Fund
$1M RI Housing Acquisition and Revitalization
$5M RI Housing WHIC
$2.1M New Market Tax Credits
$22M Federal Tax Credits
Depending on the total value of the Providence TSA, the total value of the taxpayer-funded subsidies totals between $90M and $100M.
GoLocal architecture critic Will Morgan wrote in 2019:
"Opened in 1928, it has dominated the city's skyline for almost a century as one of the grandest pre-Depression era skyscrapers in the country.
No new building in downtown Providence since has approached the wannabe-dirigible-docking station in terms of architectural excellence and design quality.
Walker & Gillette, the New York architectural firm, was one of the most significant commercial firms in the boom years before the stock market crash of 1929 put an end to such magnificent expressions of America's economic might.
Alexander Stewart Walker studied at Harvard and Leon Gillette studied at both the University of Pennsylvania and at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, the premier classical architectural school.
From the founding of their firm in 1906 until the early 1950s, Walker & Gillette was in demand as designers of country estates, manors, and mansions for the mega-rich in places like Long Island, Florida, and the Berkshires, as well as New York City.
The firm's big impact, however, was in substantial and dignified classical, Art Deco, and Modern banks, post offices, churches, and office buildings.
Noted New York works include the Fuller Building, the New York Trust, and the Electrical Products Building at the New York World's Fair.
Yet the Industrial Trust in Providence is arguably their masterpiece. Edith Crouch's recently published monograph, Walker & Gillette: American Architects, From, Classicism Through Modernism, 1900-1950s rightly has the Rhode Island tower on the cover.
The Indiana Limestone Company supplied stone facades for most of the major buildings of the era, and would sheath the grandfather of all Deco skyscrapers, the Empire State Building.
So, it is not surprising that when the limestone quarries took out a full-page advertisement in the April 1929 issue of Architecture Magazine, they chose the Providence bank for their illustration.
The limestone advertisement illustrates a point about how solidly and beautifully built commercial structures were in the 1920s.
Architecturally, the Industrial Trust unapologetically expressed the wealth, confidence, and exuberance of the time.
The Great Depression put an end to skyscrapers completely covered in marble, granite, or limestone. Large downtown buildings after World War II would, thanks to modernism and new technology, forgo traditional materials in favor of aluminum, steel, and glass. Decorative carvings, murals, bas-reliefs, and triumphant eagles were dispensed with. It really is true that they just do not build them like they used to."
The footage shows hundreds of cracks, crevices, and chipping of the limestone exterior of the building. The decay appears to have dramatically increased over the past two-plus years.
A spokesman for the owner of the building -- High Rock Development of Newtown, MA -- tells GoLocal that the building is well-maintained.
“111 Westminster Street was constructed like a fortress in 1920’s. It has survived significant weather-related events over the decades with no impact to the structural integrity of the building. The owners maintain a robust maintenance and inspection schedule of the building’s exterior to ensure water damage does not occur. Licensed professionals literally rappel off the top of the building to identify any impacted areas of the exterior that need to be removed or repaired,” said Bill Fischer spokesman.
The company refused to answer numerous questions about the condition of the facade and what efforts are being taken to maintain and improve the condition of the exterior of the building.
In September 2016, GoLocal captured in photography representatives of an insurance company who repelled down the building to conduct an inspection. As GoLocal reported, a team from the company Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates Inc. had been conducting a facade investigation of the building, which has been empty at that time for three years.
Photos from that 2016 inspection compared to GoLocal’s drone footage and photography taken in this past week show a significant increase in the decay of the facade.
As far back as 2014, an appraisal of the building by Scott & Associates of Providence cited that “the exterior of the subject [111 Westminster] has not been well maintained and requires significant pointing and masonry repairs.”
Now, five years later, the limestone is showing even more significant decay.
Over the past eight years, there have been a handful of failed Superman redevelopment plans including Citizens Bank, PayPal, Hasbro, Samsonite and others.
At least one of the Hasbro plans called for the demolition of the Superman Building.
In December of 2017, GoLocal exclusively reported “GoLocal learned that a plan by two real estate mega-forces, Providence developer Joe Paolino of Paolino Properties and Bob Gilbane of Gilbane Development, is emerging that would build an approximately 36 story tower at the location of the now vacant Superman Building.
"The new structure is being pitched to Hasbro for its new consolidated headquarters. The Paolino and Gilbane plan is just one of a number of plans submitted, but the only one that includes the demolition of the Superman building.
Some of the other proposed offered for Hasbro's consideration include building a campus for Hasbro on 195 lands. Other potential developers include Procaccianti Companies who 'has owned, developed or managed millions of square feet of real estate.' The company owns the Renaissance Hotel in Providence to name just one of its holdings.”
The National Trust for Historic Preservation says the list "spotlights important examples of our nation’s architectural and cultural heritage that are at risk of destruction or irreparable damage. As of this year, more than 300 places have been on the list over its 32-year history, and in that time fewer than five percent of listed sites have been lost."
“For over 30 years, our 11 Most Endangered Historic Places list has called attention to threatened one-of-a-kind treasures throughout the nation and galvanized Americans to help save them,” said Katherine Malone-France, interim chief preservation officer of the National Trust for Historic Preservation.
An investigation in 2014 by GoLocal found that the building was, de facto, worthless:
The Superman Building in Providence has "no value," according to an appraisal conducted earlier this year by Providence-based appraiser Scotti and Associates.
Moreover, the findings show that the Industrial National Bank Building at 111 Westminster Street would cost between $60 million and $100 million to rehabilitate.
"It's my opinion for the highest and best use is to shutter the building until which point the market conditions improve to the point that rehabilitation is an option. We estimate that as of December 31, 2012, the building has zero value," wrote Scotti in February 2014, referring to the 2012 date when the building's last tenant, Bank of America, moved out.
Following a year which saw owner High Rock Development fail in its effort to secure $70 to $75 million in local, state, and federal funding to turn the building into apartments, the city is back to the drawing board as to how to deal with the city's empty anchor.
High Rock spokesperson Bill Fischer noted that the appraisal was part of an effort to move the process along to find a viable tenant -- or tenants -- to the city's landmark building
"The Scotti appraisal is part of a tax appeal process that was proactively filed with the city by Highrock Development. We are not surprised by the findings of the report," said Fischer. "The question now becomes what can the value of the building be in the future and how can its revitalization contribute to the economic development climate in Rhode Island."
The use of public funds to subsidize the redevelopment of the building has been a political football for years.
One of the most epic battles that took place nearly a decade ago was between two top Democrats. The showdown pitted now Judge Patrick O'Neill and former Speaker of the House Gordon Fox.
Representative Patrick O'Neill has expressed serious concerns regarding a potential historic tax credit deal to turn the city's iconic "Superman" building, now almost vacant, into residential apartments.
"This is starting to look just like another 38 Studios," said O'Neill, former Majority Whip and member of Speaker of the House Gordon Fox's leadership team. O'Neill stepped down from his post last fall over differences with Fox on how the deal for the doomed video game company was pushed through the General Assembly.
Privately-owned, Massachusetts-based High Rock Development, who purchased the building in 2008, has indicated it is seeking $48 million in historic tax credits from Rhode Island, in order to convert the historic structure into roughly 250 to 275 apartments in the 428 foot tall office tower.
The state's historic tax credit program, which was eliminated in 2008 under Governor Donald Carcieri, would have to be approved in the Fiscal Year 2014 budget put forth by Governor Lincoln Chafee by the General Assembly.
A spokesperson for High Rock has said they are in the process of finishing an economic analysis, and will have a presentation with costs and impact shortly. However, O'Neill is already voicing serious reservations about the whole process.
Similarities to 38 Studios?
Former House Majority Whip under Speaker of the House Gordon Fox, O'Neill resigned from Fox's leadership team this past fall, citing philosophical differences with the Speaker -- and concern regarding the lack of information made available before lawmakers were asked to approve the 38 Studios deal in 2010.
"This is looking way too similar to 38 Studios with the timing of all of this," said O'Neill. "The mid-session announcement, the prospect of it getting pushed to an 11th hour vote with no idea what it looks like. We just can't afford to go down that road again."
While General Assembly members did not vote in 2010 to give 38 Studios the $75 million guarantee, they did vote in favor of expanding the state's Job Creation Guaranty Program from $50 million to $125 million.
O'Neill cited the lack of transparency in the 38 Studios approval process, in particular the last-minute unveiling of the proposal to General Assembly before going to a vote, that has him worried that Rhode Island is heading in a similar direction with a large-scale tax-credit deal for a single company.
"I've got real concerns about using tax credits here. We're looking at putting Rhode Islanders on the hook again, and I've seen very little information to date," said O'Neill. "I'll be honest, I've got a whole host of concerns about how this is unfolding."
