NEW: Providence Teacher Firings vs. Layoffs – What’s the Difference?
Tuesday, March 01, 2011
What’s the difference between terminating and laying off all the teachers in the district?
A lot, it turns out—at least according to a fact sheet the Mayor’s office issued today.
A teacher who is laid off—and does not end up getting their job back—ends up in a special pool of substitute teachers, technically known as Regulars in Pool, or “R’s in pool.”
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTThe school district currently has 45 such teachers in the pool. In 2009, there were as many as 100—there is no limit to how many teachers can be in the pool. Those teachers receive benefits and are paid $25,600 more a year than other long-term substitutes. “With no limit, and in anticipation of the number of positions that could be eliminated through school closures, the number of ‘R’s in pool’ could balloon,” the Mayor’s office said.
Because of this, Taveras says that laying off teachers would not have actually saved money. His office offered the following hypothetical scenario to make its point:
• Take this example: If Providence closes six schools and lays off 200 teachers, each of these teachers could become an “R in pool.” This would create an unprecedented cost to the district: 200 teachers, multiplied by full salary and benefits at approximately $100,000 each, equaling $20 million. In this scenario, closing schools would not save the City money.
• Dismissals enable the district to end its financial obligation to an individual completely if that person’s classroom teaching position is no longer needed. By issuing dismissal notices instead of layoffs, the district will eliminate the category of “R’s in pool” and stave off a potential financial liability of over $20 million.
State law requires that the city notify teachers of any possible changes to their employment by March 1.
"Given the March 1 deadline, and in light of the unprecedented fiscal crisis facing the City of Providence, City and school officials had a fiduciary responsibility to protect the taxpayers of Providence against exposure to such a significant liability," Taveras' office said.
Related Articles
- Bill Would Give Town Council Role in Teacher Contracts
- NEW: Providence Teachers Union Boss Calls on Taveras to Rescind Firing
- Block Says Teachers’ Endorsement of Chafee ‘Uninformed’
- Over 100 Central Falls Teachers Face Layoffs
- Breaking News: Chafee wins teacher’s union endorsement
- Round 2: Providence Teachers Fire Back
- BREAKING NEWS: Central Falls Teachers Say It’s a Deal
- Central Falls Teachers: Don’t Blame Us
- State Teacher Union Backs ‘Race to the Top’
- BREAKING NEWS: Gist - Central Falls Teachers, Administration Reach a Deal
- Democratic Chair and Prov Mayor are Snubbed by Teachers Union
- East Providence Committee to Vote on Teacher Contract
- BREAKING NEWS: Providence Issues Layoff Notices to All Teachers
- EP Teachers, School Committee Resume Talks
- BREAKING NEWS: Taveras Defends His Decision to Fire Teachers
- NEW: National Union President to Attend Prov. Teacher Rally
