| | Advanced Search

 

Marrocco: Federal Hill Residents Racists, Says Taveras Should “Run Back to the D.R.”—Marrocco: Federal Hill Residents Racists, Says Taveras Should…

NEW: Smiley Unveils Good Government Plan; Receives Roberts’ Endorsement—Democratic candidate for Mayor Brett Smiley has unveiled…

NEW: Fung Calls on Chafee to Rescind Caprio Beach Contract—Cranston Mayor and Republican candidate for Governor, Allan…

NEW: RI GOP Calls for Palumbo to Step Down—Rhode Island Republicans have asked for State Representative…

Organizations Past Due on Police Detail: See Who Owes the Most—Organizations Past Due on Police Detail: See Who…

Santurri: Will The Democratic Race for Providence Mayor Become Primarily Negative?—Santurri: Will The Democratic Race for Providence Mayor…

It’s All About Education: High Stakes Testing & Common Core Debate—It’s All About Education: High Stakes Testing &…

Angela Moore Fashion Show and Champagne Brunch Debuts at Rosecliff—To celebrate the 375th anniversary of Newport, the…

Pats’ Camp: Brown’s Develin steps up his game—From the Ivy League to the NFL...

Media Days Come To Rhode Island—The American Athletic Conference's Media Day took place…

 
 

NEW: Lombardi Pushes for Term Limits

Thursday, January 17, 2013

 

Would voters prefer to have their General Assembly members serve an unlimited number of two-year terms or a capped number of four-year terms?

That’s the question Rep. John J. Lombardi posed before the House today and, if he has his way, voters would make the decision in the state’s next general election.
In legislation submitted to the House today, Lombardi is calling for an amendment to the state’s constitution that would change legislators’ terms and lengths of service. If approved by voters, the change would take effect beginning with the 2016 election.

The Lombardi proposal, a Joint Resolution that is also expected to be introduced in the Senate, has been referred to the House Committee on Judiciary for consideration.

“I believe legislators serving two year terms can spend as much as half that time in office running for re-election, rather than concentrating on the people’s business,” Lombardi said. “A four-year term would ensure that legislators spend the vast majority of their time in office working to effect good government and improve the lives of state residents.”

Representative Lombardi said he is proposing a three-term limit for all legislators because “familiarity can breed laziness, a feeling of entitlement or all sorts of attitudes that make some people believe being in office is more important than serving the public while in office.”

“Someone running for office likely has issues he or she wants addressed, legislative goals he or she would like to accomplish,” he said. “A dozen years should be enough time to pursue and achieve those matters. Being a public servant does not mean being a permanent officeholder.”

Lombardi also feels that a more consistent turnover of the legislature will “bring more new, fresh ideas, more often, to the legislative process, from the rank and file members right up through leadership.”

Lombardi’s proposal was co-signed by Rep. Robert Craven, Rep. Joseph Almeida, Rep. Raymond Hull and Rep. Doreen Costa. 

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

bravo... you get burnt out after 6-8 years..

Comment #1 by jon paycheck on 2013 01 17

Yeah, we need new dems to replace the old ones.

Good idea, and with the right intentions, but the true intention would never be realized. not in this state.

Comment #2 by pearl fanch on 2013 01 17

Yeah, yeah, Lombardi is pushing all right. Pushing for headlines. He could care less about the legislature or his district.

Term limits? This is a guy who spent a LIFETIME on the Providence City Council. A LIFETIME. Now he wants headlines so he can plot his path back to 25 Dorrance Street, a place where he has three pensions on the back burner.

That's the kind of reformer we can all love.

Comment #3 by Edward Smith on 2013 01 18




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.