Mark Binder: This IS the Test
Saturday, March 02, 2013

Mark Binder offers readers his own test to see who really has the answers needed to "fix" education.
But threatening and beating the students with the stick of withholding a diploma based on their 11th grade scores on a test that was NEVER meant to be a graduation requirement is both cruel and ineffective in addressing the core challenges.
So let's take a test ourselves to see if we have the answers. Please read, and answer the questions below.
1. How do you think the “problem” of education going to be solved?
A) By better performance on standardized tests
B) By students and families taking more responsibility for their education and finally starting to care.
C) Smaller classes.
D) Teaching geared to the student rather than a clock or test
E) More computers.
F) Extend the school day and school year while bringing back the things students care about that don’t involve standardized testing, including more art, music, theater, sports, film making, video game design and other non-measurables.
G) A and E
H) All of the above, except A and E
Poverty Damages Education
Why do students in Barrington do better on standardized tests than ones in Providence, Woonsocket or Central Falls? It’s not because the kids are smarter. It’s because their parents could afford to live or move there for the public schools.
Students in low-income communities switch schools more frequently, worry about gangs and violence and may get less homework support from non-English speaking parents working multiple low-wage jobs to pay the rent.
It's hard to read a story to a child every night if you're exhausted. Even harder if you're working the night shift.
Also, to paraphrase Geoffrey Canada, if a student starts first grade a year behind, and makes one year's progress, she still starts second grade a year behind.
2. What inspired you to stay in school and learn? (select as many as you like)
A) My parents or another relative
B) My favorite teachers
C) My friends
D) I fell in love with books that had nothing to do with school
E) I knew that it was the best path to getting a good job
F) My performance on standardized tests
High Stakes Testing Hurts Teaching

Mark Binder says if you put a heavy emphasis on test scores, all you'll get is a crop of educators who "teach to the test."
This school, and many others across the state, have strict policies about what students are supposed to learn and when. I’ve even seen classrooms where teachers are expected to write their plans for the day in 15-minute intervals. I have been told that if a principal walks in and they’re not following the plan, “We’re in trouble.”
This isn’t how teaching works, and it’s certainly not how students learn—especially at the elementary level.
Anyone who has taught knows that teaching moments don’t happen according to a plan. Anyone who has been in a typical classroom knows that there are students of all levels. Some “get it” sooner and some take more time.
Teaching in 15 minute intervals doesn’t work, but teacher’s jobs depend on NECAP scores. Principal’s jobs depend on NECAP scores. (Somehow, however, Superintendents and School Commissioners seem to be exempt, and are rarely if ever held accountable for poor performance. They typically move to a new system, institute, blame the previous administration and institute a new curriculum.) This results in what? Teaching to the test. Teaching on a schedule, cramming, and test prep.
Teachers who are creative, who care about their students, who adjust what they teach, how they teach, and when they teach concepts based on the needs of their classes are being worn down, shut down and pushed out of the profession.
3. What do you most remember about your favorite teacher?
Was he/she:
A) Good at managing learning in 15 minute intervals.
B) Excellent at producing results for standardized tests.
C) Only in it for the paycheck and healthcare.
D) Inspiring, motivating and unconventional.
4. Two Paragraph Essay: Would you want to become a teacher or recommend your child become a teacher in today’s public schools? Why or why not?
Testing Doesn’t Create 21st Century Workers—or Learners

Are a heavy emphasis on test scores hurting or helping the next generation of America's workers?
Getting work today requires persistence, flexibility, and creativity.
Creating new jobs requires inspiration, innovation and the ability to persist in the face of failure.
High takes testing, especially in English, promotes short-term thinking and confuses learning with data mining. It encourages the belief that there is a “right” and a “wrong” answer.
And it punishes failure brutally.
Students who don’t read English: Fail.
Students with learning disabilities: Fail.
Students who can’t perform under pressure: Fail.
Finally, schools that have diverse levels of learners speaking dozens of languages thrown together… Fail.
5. When was the last time you solved a quadratic equation?
A) Yesterday
B) Last year
C) On a standardized test
D) Never
E) I’m not good at math.
F) This wasn’t part of the material!
6. If your high school graduation was dependent on an 11th grade standardized test, and you were either hormonal, performed poorly under pressure, or know that you’re no good at taking tests, would you have:
A) Passed
B) Failed
C) Quit School
D) Cheated
E) Begged my parents to move us to Finland or put me into a private school
The “Answer” isn’t MORE Testing
Yes, the standardized tests have shown us the problem.
What they don’t tell us is how to solve the problem.
7. Essay: How well did you perform on the tests you took in 4th and 11th grades and has it helped you create or perform in a 21st century job?
Note: If you don’t remember those tests, then you haven’t prepared for this economy, you can’t graduate, and you fail.
There will be a meeting for parents concerned with the effect that using the NECAPs as a graduation requirement on Saturday, March 3 at noon at 294 West Exchange Street, Providence. For more information, please contact Aaron Regunberg on Facebook at the Providence Student Union or log on to http://www.providencestudentunion.org/
Mark Binder is an author who frequently works in the public schools as an artist/educator. He recently ran as an Independent for State Rep from District 4 in Providence. You can learn more about his projects at http://markbinder.com or follow him on Twitter @barkminder.
Related Articles
- PowerPlayer: State Rep. Candidate Mark Binder
- Speaker Fox Opponent Mark Binder Hits the Airwaves
- Education Experts React to NECAP Scores
- Group Says Charter Schools Key to Improved NECAP Scores
- LISTEN: Opposition to NECAP Testing
- NEW: NECAP Test Scores Show Some Improvement
- NEW: Schools Improve on NECAP, but Goals Not Met
- Science NECAP Scores: How Did Your School Do?
- “Suspicious” Test Scores Found in Four RI School Districts
- NEW: State Improves Science Test Scores
- Groups Urge Postponement on High Stakes Graduation Requirements
- NEW: Groups Rip “High Stakes” Standardized Testing in Schools
- NEW: Groups Seek to Ban ‘High Stakes Testing’ in Schools
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.



Comments:
dawn morrison
10:34am on Saturday, March 02, 2013
The smartest thing Mark Binder ever wrote.
Michael Trenn
11:09am on Saturday, March 02, 2013
I went to Classical, "back in the day." We got tested every day, in every subject. Beginning in Junior year, we caught a giant break, and only got tested four days each week, in every subject. Members of my class are lawyers, doctors, teachers, and even a couple of actual rocket scientists. The discipline of the testing caused us to develop study habits that made most of us extremely successful in college, and beyond. There appears to be no discipline any more. Perhaps it is not such a bad thing.
Mark Binder
12:58pm on Saturday, March 02, 2013
Quick Correction: The meeting is today, Saturday, March 2.
Hi Michael,
I have no problem with academic testing on subjects that students are prepared for.
I have huge problems with high stakes testing that penalizes students for the holes in their education.
barry schiller
6:00pm on Saturday, March 02, 2013
Its easy to criticize standardized testing but they do provide some accountability, standards, and incentives for students to take studying more seriously, something not always supported by parents, peer culture, or the students belief system.
While the NECAP may be overemphasized, and/or a flawed measure, I'm just not clear what its opponents suggest as an alternative. If students are told they need not do well on tests, I think I know how most would react, and that would not help them succeed in the long run.
Michael Trenn
10:49am on Sunday, March 03, 2013
Mr. Binder: We were not always prepared. There was a 75% attrition rate at Classical in those days. As far as "holes" in student education are concerned; is it not the job of the Professional Education Community to fill those holes? How does one know where the "holes" are, without a standardized test? I find myself in agreementt with Mr. Schiller on this one.
Art West
4:50pm on Sunday, March 03, 2013
Well, if the point of education is to prepare students for the real world, what better way to gauge learning progress than via a test?
Assuming a student will have to work for a living, and not jump immediately onto the public dole, he or she will face tests every day that demand successful completion. I pity any kid today who is not being challenged in school, or who is being led to believe that everyone is entitled to win, or that mediocrity is acceptable. That kid will be up against some killer competition from people from other countries who have gone through a rigorous educational system.
Ed Jucation
8:40am on Monday, March 04, 2013
You are all correct. However, there is a direct correlation between parental income and standardized test scores. Barrington and East Greenwich students generally perform well while urban core students generally perform poorly. Do some research and create a graph comparing the two. If you want to end this education crisis then end poverty. Until that happens, nothing will change.
Kati Loreen
8:02pm on Monday, March 04, 2013
Let's mix up the districts. Say Barrington w/Providence; East Greenwhich w/West Warwick; Lincoln w/ Central Falls/Pawtucket; Middletown and Portsmouth w/Newport. And regionalize the remaining. Saves money and mixes the income groups. Classical demonstrates that you can mix incomes and achieve results. I have no idea what to do with Woonsocket. Maybe give it to Massachusetts? I mean CVS keeps threatening to move there anyway unless we continue to subsidize them.
Ed Jucation
8:26am on Tuesday, March 05, 2013
Great idea but impractical. Huge busing costs..who is going to pay? Parents in affluent communities would never let this happen. They would use their money and political clout to defeat it. They definitely do not want mixing of income groups because that waters down their child's education. The rich and the poor will always be adversaries and who wants their child to be educated under adverse conditions? I would love to see this happen though.
Kati Loreen
1:43pm on Tuesday, March 05, 2013
In some states, school districts are as large as RI. Hopefully consolidating back room costs, elimination of redundant administrators, and other shared costs could reduce the transportation issues. Classical High School is a good example of mixed income groups, although does cream these pools.