Cicilline, House Colleagues Demand Ethics Investigation Into Trump’s China Ties

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

 

View Larger +

David Cicilline and House colleagues demand ethics investigation into Trump's China ties

United States Congressman David Cicilline is leading more than 60 House colleagues in demanding an investigation into President Donald Trump’s efforts to help a Chinese telecom conglomerate. 

Trump's efforts come just a short time after the Chinese government provided Trump’s company with a $500 million loan.

In a letter to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, the members wrote, “The Trump administration has yet to give a satisfactory answer about the reason behind and the appropriateness of making concessions to ZTE, a Chinese company that illegally sold U.S. technology to hostile regimes.  The Trump administration has also completely failed to address the suspicious timing between this policy reversal and the Chinese government’s loan to a Trump-linked project.  As you know, the issue of U.S. policy being manipulated by a foreign entity or the personal business interests of a public official is of grave concern to the American people.  We ask that you promptly conduct a review of this matter and keep us apprised periodically about the progress of your investigation.”

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Read the full letter below:

 

David J. Apol

Acting Director

U.S. Office of Government Ethics

1201 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 500

Washington, DC 20005

 

Dear Acting Director Apol:

We write to express our strong concerns about the recent dealings between President Donald J. Trump, the Trump Organization and the Chinese government, which may have violated U.S. laws on the acceptance of payments or gifts by public officials.

As you know, the Trump Organization, with the profits going to President Trump, signed a deal to license President Trump’s name as part of a theme park development project outside of Jakarta, Indonesia. The project will be built by a Chinese state-owned construction company and will include several Trump-branded properties, such as residential developments, shops, a hotel and a golf course. On May 11, 2018, the South China Morning Post reported that the Chinese government is providing $500 million in loans for the Indonesian theme park project. 

The Chinese government’s loan provides a clear financial benefit to President Trump. Despite the nearly unanimous recommendation by legal experts that he divest from his business interests before assuming the presidency, he failed to do so, instead placing his adult children in charge of day-to-day operations. The President also retains interest in his businesses via a revocable trust, from which he can draw funds at any time of his choosing. Therefore, the President will be able to monitor the Indonesian project and earn a profit if it succeeds.

Three days after news broke of the Chinese government’s loan to the Trump project, the President announced that he ordered his administration to save ZTE, one of China’s biggest telecommunications companies, from the brink of collapse. Last month, the Commerce Department blocked American firms from selling parts or providing services to ZTE for seven years, after the company violated an agreement to pay a $1.2 billion fine for conspiring to sell U.S. technology to Iran and North Korea. After only five weeks of being denied U.S. parts.  ZTE has lost millions of dollars and is in the midst of shutting down production operations. To relieve pressure on the company, President Trump pledged that the Commerce Department will ease restrictions on ZTE. On May 22, 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. and China had agreed on a broad outline of a deal to lift the sales ban on ZTE.

We believe that these events raise several potential constitutional and ethical violations. First, the Chinese government’s loan may invoke the Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution, which prohibits officials holding an “office of profit or trust” from accepting payments or gifts from a foreign government without the consent from Congress. 

Furthermore, the extremely short time between the Chinese’s government’s loan and President Trump’s order to roll back penalties on ZTE warrants a review of any applicable federal ethics regulations.

Therefore, we ask you to investigate the following matters.

·         Whether the Emolument Clause applies to the $500 million loan by the Chinese government used to finance an Indonesian theme park project with several projected Trump-branded properties;

·         Whether President Trump sought and obtained the consent of Congress before the Chinese government made the $500 million loan benefiting Trump properties; and

·         Whether any federal statute regarding conflicts of interest or ethics may apply to President Trump or a member of the Trump administration who participated in the decision to ease restrictions on ZTE.

The Trump administration has yet to give a satisfactory answer about the reason behind and the appropriateness of making concessions to ZTE, a Chinese company that illegally sold U.S. technology to hostile regimes.  The Trump administration has also completely failed to address the suspicious timing between this policy reversal and the Chinese government’s loan to a Trump-linked project.  As you know, the issue of U.S. policy being manipulated by a foreign entity or the personal business interests of a public official is of grave concern to the American people.  We ask that you promptly conduct a review of this matter and keep us apprised periodically about the progress of your investigation.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

Related Slideshow: GoLocal: Benchmark Poll, October 2017

View Larger +
Prev Next

Sponsor: GoLocalProv

Sample: N=403

Rhode Island General Election Voters Margin of Error: +/- 4.9% at 95% Confidence Level

Interviewing Period: October 9-11, 2017

Mode: Landline (61%) and Mobile (39%)

Telephone Directed by: John Della Volpe, SocialSphere, Inc.

View Larger +
Prev Next

Are you registered to vote at this address?

Yes: 100%

View Larger +
Prev Next

When it comes to voting, do you consider yourself to be affiliated with the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, Moderate, or Unaffiliated with a major party?

Unaffiliated: 49%

Democrat: 32%

Republican: 15%

Moderate: .4%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Next year, in November of 2018, there will be a statewide general election for Governor and many other state offices. How likely is it that you will vote in this election?

Will you definitely be voting, will you probably be voting, are you 50-50...

Definitely be voting: 78%

Probably be voting: 13%

50-50: 9%

View Larger +
Prev Next

In general, would you say things in Rhode Island are headed in the right direction or are they off on the wrong track?

Right track: 39%

Wrong track: 45%

Mixed: 10%

Don't know/Refused: .6%

View Larger +
Prev Next

What would you say is the number one problem facing Rhode Island that you would like the Governor to address?

Jobs and economy:  21%

Education: 12%

Taxes: 12%

Roads: 12%

State budget: 9%

Corruption/Public integrity: .8%

Healthcare: 3%

Governor: 3%

Homelessness: 2%

Immigration: 2%

Other: 7%

Don’t know: .9%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Over the past three years or so, would you say the economy in Rhode Island has improved, gotten worse, or not changed at all?

Changed for the better: 35%

Changed for the worse: 16%

Not changed at all: 43%

Don't know/Refused: 5%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Over the same time, has your family's financial situation improved, gotten worse, or not changed at all?

Changed for the better: 26%

Changed for the worse: 19%

Not changed at all: 54%

Don't know/Refused: 1%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Recently, a proposal has been made to permit the issuance of $81 million in bonds by the State to build a new stadium for the Pawtucket Red Sox. If there was an election today on this issue, would you vote to approve or reject issuing $81 million in financing supported moral obligation bonds to build the stadium?

Net: Approve: 28%

Definitely approve: 15%

Probably approve: 14%

Net: Reject: 67%

Probably reject: 19%

Definitely reject: 48%

Don't know: 4%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Could you please tell me your age?

18-24: 7%

25-34: 15%

35-44: 15%

45-54: 20%

55-64: 17%

65+: 25%

Don't know/refused: 1%

View Larger +
Prev Next

What was the last grade you completed in school?

0-11: 2%

High school grad: 16%

Technical/Vocational school: 1%

Some college: 23%

College grad: 34%

Graduate degree: 24%

Don't know/refused: 1%

View Larger +
Prev Next

The next question is about the total income of YOUR HOUSEHOLD for the PAST 12 MONTHS. Please include your income PLUS the income of all members living in your household (including cohabiting partners and armed forces members living at home).

$50,000 or less: 27%

More $50,000 but less than $75,000: 13%

More $75,000 but less than $100,000: 13%

More $100,000 but less than $150,000: 17%

$150,000 or more: 13%

Don't know/refused: 17%

View Larger +
Prev Next

What particular ethnic group or nationality - such as English, French, Italian, Irish, Latino, Jewish, African American, and so forth - do you consider yourself a part of or feel closest to?

American/None: 21%

English: 13%

Italian: 13%

Irish: 12%

Black or African American: 6%

Latino/Hispanic: 6%

French: 6%

Portuguese: 3%

Jewish: 3%

German: 1%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Donald Trump has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as President?


Excellent: 13%
Good: 12%
Fair: 14%
Poor: 57%
Never heard of:  0%
Cannot rate: 3%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Jack Reed has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a United States Senator?

Excellent: 22%
Good: 29%
Fair: 23%
Poor: 15%
Never heard of: 6%
Cannot rate: 6%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Sheldon Whitehouse has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a United States Senator?

Excellent: 17%
Good: 22%
Fair: 21%
Poor: 28%
Never heard of: 6%
Cannot rate: 7%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that David Cicilline has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a Member of Congress?

Excellent: 9%
Good: 29%
Fair: 21%
Poor: 27%
Never heard of: 6%
Cannot rate:  8%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that James Langevin has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as a Member of Congress?

Excellent: 7%
Good: 30%
Fair: 20%
Poor: 18%
Never heard of: 13%
Cannot rate: 11%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Gina Raimondo has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Governor?

Excellent: 6%
Good: 28%
Fair: 30%
Poor: 31%
Never heard of: 1%
Cannot rate: 3%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Daniel McKee has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Lieutenant Governor?


Excellent: 3%
Good: 16%
Fair: 21%
Poor: 8%
Never heard of: 26%
Cannot rate: 25%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Peter Kilmartin has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Attorney General?


Excellent: 3%
Good: 20%
Fair: 28%
Poor: 17%
Never heard of: 13%
Cannot rate: 19%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Seth Magaziner has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as General Treasurer?

Excellent: 4%
Good: 18%
Fair: 24%
Poor: 13%
Never heard of: 21%
Cannot rate: 21%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Nellie Gorbea has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Secretary of State?

Excellent: 5%
Good: 21%
Fair: 21%
Poor: 10%
Never heard of: 20%
Cannot rate: 23%

View Larger +
Prev Next

Would you say that Jorge Elorza has done an excellent good, fair or poor job as Mayor of Providence?

Excellent: 4%
Good: 24%
Fair: 24%
Poor: 22%
Never heard of: 9%
Cannot rate: 15%

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook