| | Advanced Search

 

Fox’s Rival Calls for New Economic Model—Fox's Rival Calls for New Economic Model

New Legislation Would Raise Taxes On Some Low-Income Housing in RI—Sponsors say they owe their municipality the hard…

Side of the Rhode: Who’s Hot and Who’s Not in RI Politics?—Who's up, who's down?...

NEW: RI State Council of Churches Responds to BSA Gay Scout Policy—Says more can be done, though...

Friday Financial Five—May 24th, 2013—What you need to know for the week...

Former RI High School Baseball Standouts Starring at URI—Major contributions...

B’s Sloppy Play Gives Rangers Game 4—Boston still leads series 3-1

URI’s Mazze on Economic Forecast: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back—URI's Mazze on Economic Forecast: Two Steps Forward,…

King Strikes Out 11 to Keep Hendricken Baseball Undefeated—Hendricken stays perfect...

Report: Gist Misses Most Achievement Gap Target Numbers—see where the schools are falling short

 
 

Rowley: God, Man, and Democrats

Friday, September 02, 2011

 

“The most foolish notion of all is the belief that everything is just which is found in the customs or laws of nations…What of the many deadly, the many pestilential statutes which nations put in force? These no more deserve to be called laws than the rules a band of robbers might pass in their assembly. For if ignorant and unskillful men have prescribed deadly poisons instead of healing drugs, these cannot possibly be called physicians’ prescriptions; neither in a nation can a statute of any sort be called a law, even though the nation, in spite of being a ruinous regulation, has accepted it.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.)

After reading this quote from the ancient Roman philosopher I could not help but think of the situation right outside my door, where so many progressives roam and reign.

It has long been held that it is wrong for a man to simply take the property of another for his own purposes. But when an elected body decides to approve of such a measure, not only is there no justice for the victim, but the popular moral attitude toward the theft may be dramatically altered – “the nation, in spite of being a ruinous regulation, has accepted it.”

Today, scores of arbitrary taxes, programs, and regulations exist not for basic government overhead, but for the express purpose of extracting property from some in order to provide for others – simply because enough “ignorant and unskillful men” believe “at a certain point, you’ve made enough money,” and that “when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

It’s funny, the ancient moral precepts may stand as strong and true as ever (most people still declare that stealing is immoral). Even logical extrapolation survives (many Americans still object to the idea of wealth redistribution). Yet, the activist mentality tends to wither (most people don’t complain).

Perhaps this is what Edmund Burke had in mind when he said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Perhaps this is what Thomas Jefferson spoke of when he warned, “The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.”

And perhaps this is why Democrats passed the 2010 healthcare bill with such urgency, even in the face of widespread skepticism and outrage. As conservative commentator David Harsanyi reminded everyone, “There exists almost no historical evidence to suggest Republicans will possess either the fortitude or the power to undo a massive government entitlement program…Once government infiltrates, it rarely retreats.” Worst of all, “Democrats know it.”

Social Democracy vs. Natural Law

There are numerous rules and regulations that run afoul to core American values. Revered by the Left, the political scheme that enables this is known as “social democracy,” an arrangement that allows more and more power to be placed in government hands – as long as the voters say “okay.”

“Social democracy is a topic that I will talk about[,] and dream about[,] and plan for anytime I freakin’ want,” wrote a local left-wing blogger last year. Unfortunately for Democrats, social democracy is the wretched antithesis of Cicero’s (and the American Founders’) belief in Natural Law, which instructs that any government hoping to administer true justice must establish itself upon the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” (Declaration of Independence). “We are born for Justice, and the right is based, not upon men’s opinions, but upon Nature,” Cicero proclaimed. “If the principles of Justice were founded on the decrees of Peoples, the edicts of princes, or the decisions of judges, then Justice would sanction robbery and adultery and the forgery of wills, in case these acts were approved by the votes or decrees of the populace.”

Democrats, too, often speak of justice – social justice, economic justice, racial justice, environmental justice – all of which command the redistribution of wealth. In other words, they require contempt and disregard of Natural Law. According to Democrats, timeless and universal laws must be broken – injustice must occur – in order to achieve justice in our time.

Under social democracy, what was once immoral can now be ethical and normal. Why? Because a majority of a voting population – or simply a majority of the elected – suddenly said so.

Welcome to the Democratic Party – where man is God.

Democrats vs. Natural Law

Samuel Adams once described America’s stand against collectivism in this manner: “The Utopian schemes of leveling and a community of goods are as visionary and impractical as those which vest all property in the Crown. [These ideas] are arbitrary, despotic, and, in our government, unconstitutional.”
It is Natural Law that provided the moral underpinning of this limited government, insisting that no Earthly government has the right to craft laws outside of its realm. According to Cicero, all “human laws” must be “in conformity” to Nature’s Law in order to establish justice – so to “inflict punishment upon the wicked and protect the good.”

That’s it.

But leftists are void of such governmental discipline. Democrats always need to do more. They are always looking to “gain ground.”

Barack Obama, belonging to a party that contends that the Constitution is a “living, breathing document,” once expressed his own frustration with the Constitution. In 2001 he said, “The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”

Justice is a noble pursuit. But the rules and regulations that distinguish justice shouldn’t be based merely on modern political fads and feelings. First, they must be in harmony with the universal and timeless moral foundation that helped guide this nation into miracle-levels of prosperity.

Travis Rowley (TravisRowley.com) is chairman of the RI Young Republicans and a consultant for the Barry Hinckley Campaign for US Senate.


 

If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.

 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

johnny jones

If this piece of garbage Rowley dislikes the democrats so much, maybe he can ask them to revoke his old man's $100,000 state police pension (which he never paid a dime into). But if that happens, where are father and son going to get their booze money to blow every day at the Twin Willows?

John T

Natural law is such a garbage concept. Not everything the founders said is some golden rule. Let us remember that society is far different now than then; and let us not make the argument that the Romans and the founders believed in similar things so it must be true. Technology did jump nearly as fast then as it has this last 100 years or so. As far as I am concerned, laws are made by the social contract. I think Rowley needs to read Rousseau and Rawls. Those who believe in this natural law are ignorant to scientific study. Nice try Rowley.

Travis Yowley

Ahhhh, so that's where the Beaver and his father hang out!

Michael Trenn

"Rowley needs to read Rousseau..." Are you kidding? Rowley is very well-educated, and one assumes he has some familiarity with Rousseau. By the way, so did Robespierre, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao. Mllions died as a result.

Donald Galamaga

Well written, Travis. Excellent illustration of the divide between truth and relativism, the latter, along with anarchy being a natural outcome of the social contract crowd. Some institutions do not seem to have the intellectual capacity to teach anything about the natural law, since it does not fit with the human arrogance model of discourse and judgment.

jack flash

What, no more comments by Buc Kner...come on Robert.

paul zecchino

Rowley needs to read Rousseau? Spare us. Please.

That the best the lefties can do, invoke the name of yet another tediously predictable left wing anarchist who was slain by his fellow corkscrew-tailed komrades?

The French Revolution begat mayhem, decapitations - my my, how very jihad of them, eh? - genocide, and for the icing on the rancid cake of totalitarianism, Napoleon.

The left is hate and every society it infests shortly becomes a starving, genocidal police state.

Mr. Rowley nicely exposed Rousseau as the charlatan he was. How? By describing in his article the actions, statements, and tactics of communists and their useful idiots. They all stink alike.

No one will accuse leftists originality. You can chart the tediously predictable
moves of marxists and their dupes like the steps of the Lambeth Walk.

Leftists burp up the same old lies over and over and over. They drag their bag of putrid marxist garbage from one nation to another, dump its rancid, putrescent collectiveist contents on citizens in effort to deprive them of liberty and wealth, and 'move on' to their next victim-nation.

Those who dislike natural law may feel free with the blessing of many to move permanently to Cuba. 'Dr.' fidel castro-ruz dislikes 'natural law' as well, and he'll gladly welcome any 'progressives' to his island gulag.

Good ol' don fido knows how to show natural-law hating leftists a good time. He confiscates all that they have and in exchange hands them a cheape pair of work pants and shoddy work shoes - better hope they last you a lifetime, komrades - and ships them off to his scenic sugar plantations in the Oriente.

They'll never be heard from again which means we'll not hear of them here either, and the sugar harvest will be...will be...well it will be as it's always been, pitiful, in a country known for perfect climate and growing conditions.

Such is the destructive power of socialism, a noxious philosophy cobbled up by an 18th century self-hating crazy man.

Mr. Rowley is clearly guilty of making sense, judging by the overheated and tediously predictable moronic invective issuing from the usual gang of leftist bullies.

The eyes of the American people are wide open and for the first time in many decades, they're seeing clearly the cruel empty promises and pathological lies of karlo marx's corkscrew-tailed sly, mean, descendants.

Paul Vincent Zecchino
Manasota Key, Florida
milspec390@aol.com
05 September, 2011




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.