NEW: RI ACLU Appeals Ruling in Providence Student Housing Case
Friday, June 14, 2019
The Rhode Island ACLU is calling on the Supreme Court to reverse a Superior Court ruling which upheld the Providence housing ordinance prohibiting more than three “college students” from living together in certain housing in some areas of the city.
The appeal comes after Superior Court Judge Maureen Keough said she had “strong reservations concerning the effectiveness” of the ordinance and said it “seems nonsensical,” but ruled against a group of Johnson and Wales students in February of 2018.
“This case presents an important opportunity for the Supreme Court to show that Rhode Island’s Constitution reflects our values as a community. College students represent the future of our state, and we should not tolerate laws that discriminate against them or treat them as second-class citizens,” said ACLU attorney Jeffrey Levy.
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTThe Case
In 2016, ACLU of RI cooperating attorneys Levy and Charles Blackman filed the lawsuit on behalf of the owner and tenants – four Johnson & Wales undergraduate students – of a house in the Elmhurst section of Providence.
The City ordinance makes it illegal for more than three “college students” of any age or level of educational status to live together in a non-owner-occupied single family home in certain residential areas.
The ACLU’s lawsuit argues that the ordinance is discriminatory and ineffective in its stated purpose of improving neighborhoods, and violates the plaintiffs’ rights to due process and equal protection of the law.
Excerpts from the ACLU brief are as follows:
“It is up to this Court to determine whether the City of Providence can discriminate against some residents simply because they are enrolled in an institution of higher learning, whether Rhode Islanders have a fundamental right to choose their living companions, and whether the City can enact and enforce a blatantly discriminatory ordinance merely to placate frustrated local residents, even if the ordinance itself is ‘nonsensical’ and will almost certainly be ineffective.”
“There is no reason to believe that in a neighborhood with a mix of single family homes and multi-family homes, enacting legislation that targets only the single-family homes will have any appreciable impact on noise, parking, public drinking, or other problems that might sometimes be associated with student housing. The Ordinance also discriminates against Rhode Islanders solely on the basis of their decision to pursue higher education.”
“We should be smoothing the path to the pursuit of education, not erecting obstacles that will limit the housing choices available to a resident simply because she is enrolled in a course at CCRI or is a full-time undergraduate at Providence College. Instead, the City would permit four unrelated and unemployed eighteen-year-olds to live together in a single-family home, but should they decide to enroll in a college course, their cohabitation would immediately become illegal.”
“The Student Housing ordinance defines ‘college student’ to include both graduate students and part-time students. . . [T]he Ordinance prohibits four divinity students from renting a single-family home together, or four unrelated adults who are taking part-time college courses. There is absolutely no evidence that tenants in Providence are more likely to cause a disturbance merely because they are enrolled at an institution of higher learning.”
Related Articles
- NEW: RI ACLU Urges North Smithfield Town Council to Reject Proposed Nike Ban
- RI ACLU Calls for Review of Pawtucket Police Dept. Following Fatal Shooting
- RI ACLU Criticizes Kilmartin’s Handling of Morgan’s Request for Google Documents
- RI ACLU, Community Groups Respond to Outrage Over Gardner Living in Prov
- ACLU’s Brown Criticizes Gardner’s Arrest By Cranston Police
- RI ACLU Sues Woonsocket for Withholding Grant Funds from Sojourner House
- RI ACLU: ICE, U.S. Citizenship Services Conspired to Arrest Undocumented Immigrants
- RI ACLU’s Brown Calls Supreme Court Ruling on Travel Ban “Shameful”
- ACLU’s Brown Joins GoLocal LIVE to Discuss Newport Grand Sex and Age Discrimination Law Suit
- UPDATED: RI Taxing Facts But Not Fiction is 1st Amendment Violation, Says RI ACLU in Federal Lawsuit
- RI ACLU Opposes Extradition of Alleged Cop Killer — “Likely to be Tortured” if Returned to DR
- Building Opposition to Warwick’s School Budget, ACLU Opposed to Student Fees
- RI ACLU Sues Achievement First Mayoral Academy Over Transgender Policy - UPDATED
- ACLU Criticizes RIPTA for Attempting to Block Video Taping of Open Meeting
- ACLU, Pawtucket Battle Over Police Abuse Records
- Woonsocket to Pay $35K in Grant Funds to Sojourner House Following Settlement with RI ACLU
- Confidential RI ACLU Letter Criticizes National ACLU’s Growing Political Partisanship
