Nguyen: Goodell’s Final Decision - Does the Punishment Fit the Crime?
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
It has been reported that Brady intends to fight the Decision in federal court. The League filed a preemptive action in a federal court in New York on Tuesday, basically asking the judge to rule that the Decision is valid and enforceable.
Should Brady file a claim against the League or Goodell, it is likely that he will file it in the same case that is already filed in New York and seek an injunction, asking the court to keep the status quo while the case is resolved. In other words, allow him to play while the case in pending.
It will be interesting to see what the court does if Brady requests an injunction. Litigation takes a long time and it is unlikely that the court case here would resolve prior to the start of the regular NFL season. Granting Brady an injunction would mean that he plays the games from which Goodell suspended him. But what if the court ultimately finds that Goodell’s Decision is valid? How will Brady pay if the first four games are already played? Or vice versa, if Brady is not granted an injunction and it is ultimately determined that Goodell was wrong, how can Brady be made whole? More importantly, how can Patriots Nation be made whole?
The answers to these questions will happen very quickly – probably within the next month.
While Patriots fans are clamoring for Brady to take it to court, the question is, what exactly would Brady be challenging in court? Brady’s lawyers will likely rehash all the arguments they brought up already – that Goodell should not have been the hearing officer to preside over the appeal, that Goodell did not have a basis for finding that Brady was involved in deflating game balls, and that the punishment does not fit the crime.
Interestingly, the actual Decision may provide more fodder for Brady’s position that the punishment does not fit the crime. The Decision sheds light on why Goodell thinks a 4-game suspension is appropriate.
Here’s an excerpt of the Decision that summarizes Goodell’s findings:
For the sake of argument, let’s assume these two findings are true. Goodell now has to explain how
suspending Brady for the first 4 games is the right punishment. To do that, Goodell first relies on the argument that “[n]o prior conduct detrimental proceeding is directly comparable to this one,” which conveniently gives him some leeway in determining the “appropriate” punishment.
Brett Favre was fined $50,000 in 2010 for his failure to cooperate with an investigation in a forthcoming manner in connection with the Jenn Sterger scandal. Goodell makes it a point to say that Brady’s case is not the same given “his involvement with the tampering scheme and his destruction of relevant evidence” (his cell phone). However, I daresay that Brady’s case is not the same only because Goodell could not find any violation against Favre. Arguably, the precedent for failure to cooperate in an investigation should be a fine, and the more severe the non-cooperation, the bigger the fine.
Is that a fair assessment? Is deflating footballs during one game the same as steroid use? In other words should Brady be treated the same as a player who was accused of using steroids and stalled the investigation and was ultimately found to be guilty? Goodell’s comparison of deflating footballs to using steroids will probably be a hot topic in the sports world in the weeks to come.
What do you think?
AiVi Nguyen is a trial lawyer with the Law Firm of Bowditch & Dewey, LLP in Worcester.
Related Slideshow: 5 Things to Know About Tom Brady’s Appeal
Here are 5 things to know about Tom Brady's Appeal.
Tom Brady was suspended for four games by the NFL on May 11 for his role in deflating footballs.
According to the Wells Report, "It is more probable than not that Tom Brady (the quarterback for the Patriots) was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities."
Tom Brady has yet to make a public comment on the report, except at a speaking engagement at Salem State, where he claimed to "have no reaction" to the report.
However, his agent, Don Yee, came out very strongly once the suspension was handed down.
“The discipline is ridiculous and has no legitimate basis. In my opinion, this outcome was pre-determined; there was no fairness in the Wells investigation whatsoever. There is no evidence that Tom directed footballs be set at pressures below the allowable limits," said Yee in a statement.
As it stands now (pre appeal result), Brady's first game back would be against the Indianapolis Colts in mid-October.
Shortly after the suspension was handed down, Tom Brady hired attorney Jeffery Kessler to represent him at hs appeal hearing.
Kessler has a histroy of winning big cases against the NFL, most recently a case in which Adrian Peterson was accused in May of 2014 for beating his son with a branch of a tree.
The case went to federal court and Peterson's suspension was vacated. He was reinstated on April 15, 2015.
Kessler has also represented player associations in all major sports (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL) and individual athletes in the NFL, NBA, AFL and MLS.
Goodell the Arbitrator
In mid-May, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell appointed himself as the arbitrator in the hearing, despite the NFLPA demanding that an independent arbitrator be hired in a letter to the league.
Excerpt From Letter
This letter will serve as a formal demand that the Commissioner follow the Rice precedent and appoint an independent person to serve as arbitrator over Mr. Brady’s appeal. If the Commissioner does not appoint such a neutral arbitrator, the NFLPA and Mr. Brady will seek recusal and pursue all available relief to obtain an arbitrator who is not evidently partial.
Despite the NFLPA asking Goodell to recuse himself on a few other occasions, Goodell has refused to do so saying "I look forward to hearing directly from Tom if there is new information or there is information that can be helpful to us in getting this right."
Ted Wells at the Appeal
On Monday, June 22, it was reported that Ted Wells will be at Brady's appeal hearing and will likely testify.
Since the release of the report, Ted Wells has come under criticism from all angles, including a Wells Report Rebuttal, released by the Patriots, and has gone on a conference call with media members to defend his report.
“It is wrong to criticize my independence, just because you disagree with my findings," Wells said on the call.
With Jeffery Kessler doing the questioning, Wells will have to defend his report again.
If Brady wins/ loses
The NFL and NFLPA have left Thursday, June 25 open in case the hearing needs a second day, however, many reports indicate the hearing won't last longer than two days.
“If he is successful in his appeal, it ends there. If Tom isn't successful in the appeal, his only option is to sue in court,” said Attorney and GoLocalProv contributor AiVi Nguyen.
“The collective bargaining agreement is supposed to be the ONLY tool that the league uses to solve problems. Like it's meant to keep the courts out of it.
So if Brady sues in court, one of his arguments must be that Goodell either violated the CBA so it doesn't apply or that Goodell didn't fairly apply the CBA to Brady as compared to others,” Nguyen added.
- NEW: NFL Statement and Letters to Brady, Patriots Regarding Deflategate
- REPORT: Tom Brady to be Suspended by NFL
- Brady’s Agent Releases Statement on 4 Game Suspension
- NEW: Tom Brady Suspended 4 Games
- NEW: Tom Brady, NFLPA Officially File Appeal
- NEW: Tom Brady Addresses Wells Report
- NEW: Wells Report Released, Claims Patriots, Brady Cheated
- Finneran: Tom Brady, Blessed By An Angel
- April Fools From Tom Brady
- Tom Brady Throws Out First Pitch at Fenway
- Tom Brady Skips Trip to White House
- Brady’s Lawyer Has History of Winning Big Cases Against NFL
- NFLPA Makes Letter to NFL Regarding Brady Appeal Public
- NEW: NFLPA Releases Statement on Brady Suspension
- GoLocalTV: Brady’s Future Uncertain as Patriots Begin Camp
- New England Patriots Statement on Brady Suspension
- NEW: Brady’s Agent Responds, Calls NFL’s Appeal Process a ‘Sham’
- GoLocalTV: NFL Upholds Brady’s Suspension as Pats Begin Training Camp
- Decision on Brady Appeal Coming Soon, According to Goodell
- 5 Things to Know About Tom Brady’s Deflategate Appeal
- What Legal Steps Will Tom Brady Take to Fight 4 Game Suspension?
- Nguyen: Appealing the Suspension: Brady’s Play Options
- NEW: Tom Brady’s Appeal Hearing Will be Held June 23
- NEW: Tom Brady and Brandon Spikes Went Out Together Last Weekend
- NFL Upholds Brady’s 4 Game Suspension
- Nguyen: Blurred Lines Indeed: Did The Jury Get It Wrong?
- Nguyen: Getting Robert Durst “Confession” Recordings Into Evidence at Trial
- Nguyen: Compensating the Victims of the Germanwings Tragedy
- Nguyen & Agudelo Called Up For National Team Duty
- Nguyen: Sentencing Tsarnaev To Death: The Burden Of Proof
- Nguyen: Does Your March Madness Work Pool Break The Law?
- Nguyen: The Email Scandal: Did Hillary Clinton Break The Law?
- Nguyen’s Numbers Not Enough - Keane Named MLS MVP
- Nguyen: Boston Marathon Bomber’s Jury: How Did We Get Here?
- Nguyen: The Civil Suits Against Aaron Hernandez
- Nguyen: Same Sex Marriage Before the Supreme Court: What is at Stake?
- Nguyen: MLB Hacking Scandal - The Cardinals’ Potential Legal Exposure
- Nguyen: The Hope Solo Saga: U.S. Soccer and Domestic Violence Allegations
- Nguyen: Understanding the Logic of the Same-Sex Marriage Decision by SCOTUS
- Nguyen: Spanking Your Kids: The Parental Privilege Defense
- Nguyen: Fans are Tired of the “Baseball Rule” and Demand Safety
- Nguyen: Does Prohibiting A Scandalous Trademark Infringe On Right To Free Speech?
- Nguyen: How Will The Law Protect Caitlyn Jenner Against Discrimination?
- Nguyen: Tsarnaev: The Cost Of A Death Sentence Versus Life Imprisonment
- Nguyen: Pay to Play Investigation of Craft Beer Industry Comes to a Head
- Nguyen: Asian Americans Seek To Abolish Affirmative Action At Harvard
- Nguyen: The Ashley Madison Hack - Why Users Should Probably Still Be Worried