Share It
Get Immersed. Offer your comments, thoughts, and views.
From: Rob Horowitz: The Politics Rule Out Single-Payer Health Care System
in Politics
"Today, these powerful interests would launch an all-out campaign against any effort to adopt a single-payer, government-run heath care system."No offense, Rob, but I don't think you know what you're talking about on this one. Here's CEO, Chairman and President Mark Bertolin:
"Health Insurers Face Extinction"
http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/HIMSS12-Aetna-CEO-insurers-face-extinction-44041-1.html?bcpg=2
Plus, government run? You seem to be about what healthcare payers actually do.
From: NEW: City Severs Ties With $395/Hour Advisor Robert Flanders
in News
So Angel's little plan went awry? These clown shoes are pathetic. Angel surrounds him self with the "new" group and these clowns have no clue what their doing. Although, their making sure they get their jobs by taking down anyone they can. I see a smoke screen coming, they must have another scandal in the back somewhere to distract the ignorant mob. Time to take out someone else's reputation to keep the facade going. Well McGowan what will be the next smoke screen your handlers will have you stoke to distract the heard?From: NEW: RIPEC Report Finds Bankruptcy Might Not Solve Cash-Strapped Cities’ Problems
in News
Anyone who is given $50,000,000 to $100,000,000 to pay a city's expenses for a year, and can't turn that money into a profit, should not be in a position to handle that much money in the first place.On second thought, they probably shouldn't be responsible for tying their own shoes either.
From: NEW: RIPEC Report Finds Bankruptcy Might Not Solve Cash-Strapped Cities’ Problems
in News
Of course bankruptcy won't solve the problems of the cities and towns.All of us Comment Writers are all saying the same thing, but naturally it keeps falling on DEAF ears.
If you don't change what got you to the point of bankruptcy, then you're just going to repeat the process.
Government needs to change.
Unions need to change.
Until these two things happen, NOTHING WILL CHANGE.
However, I don't understand why these people aren't allowed to make as much profit as they want.
If you don't like their terms, don't go there. Pretty simple concept, isn't it?
From: Alex and Ani Creates Limited Edition Charms for Newport Festivals
A Beading Abd Pleated Halter With A V Neckline Trumpet Evening Dress With A Furcation [FPSTVSPU] - $152.99 :From: Travis Rowley: Liberalism’s Bedrock of Lies
in Politics
So, every liberal believes the same thing. Al Sharpton is representative of every person who identifies as a liberal? This is exactly what rubs me the wrong way - the blatant, sweeping generalizations about political ideology. I identify as a liberal, but Al Sharpton does not speak for me, nor for many people I know who also identify as politically liberal. Nor does Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann or any other pundit. I prefer to think for myself and engage in discourse from my perspective. As I suspect with you, Jared D, I refuse to be categorized or labelled by others, certainly not by others who want a nice black-and-white, simplistic definition of a liberal, conservative or any other political belief. If Rowley speaks for all conservatives, heaven help them, because his tar brush is wide and all-covering. I have conservative friends who despise President Obama's policies in general, but support his push to repeal Don't Ask/Don't Tell and who'd like to see DOMA go the way of the dodo.Rowley believes that all liberals walk in lock-step on the issue of race relations and victimization. Really? So liberals don't believe in letting justice take its course, waiting for the presentation of evidence in court following a thorough investigation. So there's no accounting for extremist media types who rant and rave to stir up trouble (and ratings), but who do not actually represent a thinking majority of self-identified liberals. Tell me, does Bill O'Reilly or Geln Beck speak for you on every issue? Do you cede them that power over your beliefs? If so, then you are welcome to let Mr. Rowley speak for you because, then, it seems you'd prefer to be exactly like the stereotypical American voter most politicians believe we are, aka those who let others make their decisions for them.
From: Chafee Talks Reforms With Leaders From Struggling Cities and Towns
in News
This guy has proven how incompetent he is.He's still insisting that the cities and towns are in their situations because of "years of cuts in state aid".
How about the simple fact that they are spending more than they are taking in????????
CUT CUT CUT CUT CUT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you understand what it means????????????????????????????????????
From: NEW: Councilman Nearly Resigned Over Prov. Redistricting Process
in News
That sounds like a nice shirt,where can I get one lol I would like something a little more expensive thou ,Ill pay up to 20 lolFrom: Travis Rowley: Liberalism’s Bedrock of Lies
in Politics
When I see a dyed in the wool liberal like Rachel Maddow whining over 5-4 decisions on campaign funding and the 2nd Amendment it's amusing because she doesn't have a problem with 5-4 decisions like Roe v.Wade.A 5-4 decision is is the determining one as much as a 9-0 decision is.
Legally speaking.It is true that a 5-4 decision raises more emotional hackles.
I accept Roe v.Wade because it is the law of the land ubder our system-same with the case of the mandate to educate ilegal aliens inpublic schools.
I have to be consistent or I have no argument.
There is a remedy to Roe v.Wade and any other SCOTUS decision which shocks the conscience of enough people-a Constitutional amendment.Hard as hell to accomplish,but then again we don't want a Constitution that can be changed like underwear either.
From: Travis Rowley: Liberalism’s Bedrock of Lies
in Politics
When Rowley claims that liberalism is a lie, I think he makes it pretty clear that he's talking about one major component of modern liberalism, which is the presumption of "victim status" for certain groups (minorities, gays, homosexuals, etc). Contrary to what you say, Rowley then went on to provide "proof" for his dispute of this major portion of liberalism. He went on to dissect the exploitation of these groups by liberals and explain its purpose. Is this even in dispute anymore, that liberals exploit these groups for political gain? Al Sharpton, anyone? Then, Rowley cited some cases for you---Duke, Cambridge Police, Prof. Dunn, and his own experiences at Brown. These represent the "lies" that are needed to uphold the "victim lie."You wrote: "He provides no proof that all liberal thought is a lie, because he can't, and you well know it."
Mr. Ferreira, I think you should read the article again.
From: How’d RI Cities Do: New England’s Best Cities 2012
in Lifestyle
Congratulations on wasting a lpt of time on a story maybe a few hundred people will read. GOLOCAL has zero credentials to back up a comparative review of cities. This site is driven purely by political interests and ad revenue in a place with 2 degrees of separation. Leave the city ranking to national publications and stick to what you're good at.From: NEW: PHA Director O’Rourke Won’t Go on Leave
in News
The only harassment I see here Is the Ill informed people that think Steven Is innocent !!Maybe we should be looking at the failure of education if people are not understanding what they're getting into.
From: Methodology: New England’s Best Cities 2012
in Lifestyle
Shouldn't all communities designated as cities throughout New England have been included in the survey? Wither Newport (you know, the City by the Sea)? What about Pittsfield, Lawrence, New Bedford, Quincy? If you are to make a credible comparison, shouldn't there have been a comprehensive list, including all capital cities (hello, Montpelier?)From: Travis Rowley: Liberalism’s Bedrock of Lies
in Politics
Yes, Jared D, seriously. I am a debate coach and the first rule of debate is never assume that you know everything about your topic because that's when the opponent pulls out the question or comment you didn't prepare for. Second rule, know your opponents arguments better than they know them themselves. Rowley puts forth an attitude of knowing all the answers, as do most of these biased pundits. They have all the answers and anyone who differs with them is completely wrong, end of discussion.You want a rebuttal to Rowley's arguments? Well, sorry to disappoint you, because I, too, believe that the media rushes to judgement all for ratings, regardless of political bias. Fox is just as culpable as MSNBC, et. al. What I despise is the assumption by Rowley, or any other extremist politico, that any approach other than reasoned and logical discussion and compromise will produce lasting and valuable results. Rowley's accusations are simply a local, ill-informed example of the toxic nature of political discourse that has ruined the business governing in this state and in this nation. Treyvon Martin's murder is not unique, in and of itself, which is a problem. This senseless death is a symptom of the dysfunction of society where trust in one another and in our official institutions is at an all-time low. Yet, the media from both political persuasions jumps on this story to short-circuit the justice system in an effort to score political points and, more important, ratings that translate into money.
Rowley's position takes the liberal media to task and he dismisses all liberal thinking by using Martin's murder as a stalking horse for conservative ideology. Where's his proof (if he's so confident he's right) that minorities have no reason to believe that they aren't discriminated against and that they haven't been victims of bias, bigotry, etc.? This is why I questioned his confidence and arrogance. He provides no proof that all liberal thought is a lie, because he can't, and you well know it. I notice you didn't query my posting about the substance of his argument as relates to calling liberalism a lie. Do I then conclude that you believe he over-reached by denouncing all liberal thought and action is a lie, because that is the kernel of his argument? Take that away and Rowley basically debates nothing. That's why I responded the way I did, because he has little enough in his debating arsenal to fight with other than bias.
From: Side of the Rhode: Who’s Hot and Who’s Not in RI Politics?
in Politics
The Doherty e-mail didn't said March 30th was the end of the quarter. It was the deadline to reach the campaign's quarterly goal (probably so they could get funds processed and deposited by the end fo the month).While it's only a minor mistake, the lack of attention to detail is something that could catch up to someone trying to stay employed as a journalist.
From: NEW: Gemma Attempting to Staff Up Ahead of Campaign Announcement
in News
Golocal---get off this guy's sack. He's an absolute NON FACTOR in any race. He won't win. Cicilline SHOULDN'T win. This race is Doherty's to lose.Why you insist on writing about a guy who isn't even in the race yet, only raises the question, does someone in your "news" department have an agenda??
From: NEW: RISC Opposes Woonsocket Tax Hike
in News
Here's an alternative.....fire the people responsible for the over spending. Make people accountable.The democrats answer to every situation is RAISE TAXES. If that was the solution, there would never be any issues.
When will RI voters ever learn?
From: KIDS COUNT Report: State’s Poorest Cities Threaten Children’s Well-Being
in News
I've read all the comments, and you're all right. This article is a no brainer. Is anyone really surprised that the bulk of the poor children are coming from the larger cities within the state?Imagine if there was no welfare system. Single parents wouldn't continue having children that they couldn't afford or support. Now, the more children you have, the more aid you receive from welfare. Keep them coming. How about making these parents actually work for their own support? I know, crazy idea.
Imagine if mothers and fathers actually stayed married. Again, another crazy idea.
Imagine if law enforcement got rid of the illegals that don't belong here....wow, I'm full of crazy ideas today.
From: Rob Horowitz: The Politics Rule Out Single-Payer Health Care System
in Politics
Deal with tort reform and allow for interstate purchasing long before you start forcing the struggling to chose between food and insurance.The whole premise of government forcing people to buy health insurance is redicilous
From: NEW: City Severs Ties With $395/Hour Advisor Robert Flanders
in News
Taveras just fired the only Sherpa who knows how to guide him off the brutal mountain Cicilline created for him to climb.He should have gotten over his hurt feelings and stayed with the pro.
Now Prov. will have to hire another lawyer who knows less and will have to learn the ropes of municipal bankruptcies.
Oh well....
From: Red Sox Report: Beckett Injured, Bailey May Need Surgery
in Sports
Great move by them signing Melancon, right ???From: Red Sox Report: Beckett Injured, Bailey May Need Surgery
in Sports
Scott, if they do send Bard back to be the closer, how much do you thinkthat would mess his head up ??? Can he even do that seeing as they have stretched his arm out for the SP role ??? They haven't even played a meaningful game yet & Bobby V is going to get his first taste of the Real Red Sox Nation on how he handles this. Great job as always & keep up the great work, Mikey.
Page 702 of 1359 pages « First < 700 701 702 703 704 > Last »



Follow us on Facebook Twitter See It Read It Share It