Will This Be the Year an Ethics Amendment Passes the RI General Assembly?

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

 

View Larger +

Senator James Sheehan and Speaker Nicholas Mattiello

State Senator James Sheehan (D-North Kingstown), who has been pushing for ethics reform, said this week there is "new hope" for a constitutional ethics amendment that would restore the jurisdiction of the Ethics Commission over the core legislative acts of the members of the General Assembly. 

H. Philip West, Jr, who served eighteen years as executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island and as author of SECRETS & SCANDALS: Reforming Rhode Island, 1986-2006, has been as staunch advocate for such an amendment.

"This is year seven since the Irons decision immunized 113 members of the General Assembly against prosecution for conflicts-of-interest. All other public officials remain accountable and subject to fines up to $25,000 for each specific violation. Only a constitutional amendment can restore the Ethics Commission’s authority, and it’s good that Speaker Mattiello and Senate President Paiva Weed may be ready to let the voters decide," said West. 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

"Compromise is possible, but the details matter," continued West. "Legislation proposed by the late Sen. Michael Lenihan in 2010 and filed every year since then would restore the Ethics Commission’s authority to prosecute legislative conflicts-of-interest. Any amendment would have to accomplish that."

Speaker of the House Nicholas Mattiello acknowledged that the House would take up some ethics legislation shortly -- and that striking a "balance" between the Assembly and the Ethics Commission is on the  table.

“I expect that an ethics bill will be introduced in the House within the next few weeks that will look at the issue of the speech-in-debate clause in the state Constitution.  It was designed to encourage General Assembly members to participate in debates," said Mattiello. "I also recognize the need to have conflict-of-interest oversight by the Ethics Commission.  There may have to be a rebalancing of the roles between the General Assembly and the Ethics Commission.”

Sheehan on the Record

"An Ethics Amendment, one originating in the House and one in the Senate, likely will pass their respective chambers this year," said Sheehan. "This alone would represent the most movement on this issue over the past six years of trying." 

"However, obstacles remain," added Sheehan. "Will either chamber be tempted to play the game of "blame game" during this volatile election season? To win this game, one chamber would approve a bill that will be heralded by good government groups, but does not provide any legitimate room for essential free, public speech for legislators, causing the other chamber to reject it."

"Legislative free speech is a venerated right dating back to the English Bill of Rights of 1689 that allows legislators to freely discuss bills and policies (later has been interpreted to include all core legislative duties) without fear of repercussions," said Sheehan. "Both the Senate and House leaders highly regard this historic right. Note: my bill would limit the scope of this privilege to the most essential speech right, namely public discussion on the floors of each chamber and in committees during session."

"Were this kind of pure, uncompromising bill surface in either the House or Senate, I would consider it an Ethics Trojan Horse.  It's design would be to give cover for legislators in the next election, but likely lead to gridlock, killing ethics reform again this year," said Sheehan. "I believe that both the Speaker and President need to show a willingness to compromise on this issue in order for an Ethics Amendment to pass the General Assembly this year.

  

View Larger +

Phil West, former head of Common Cause

West on History

"The 2004 Separation of Powers Amendment gave Rhode Island governors power to appoint all members of any board or commission that executes state law. I know legislative leaders have been concerned that a future court ruling could shut them out of their current role in nominating five of nine members of the Ethics Commission. One compromise would be to put the composition into the Constitution. Legislative leaders would then be certain no governor could turn the commission against them," said West. 

"A far more difficult compromise might involve some limit on the Ethics Commission’s rule-making authority. The 1986 Ethics in Government Amendment to the Rhode Island Constitution established the Ethics Commission with extraordinary authority “to adopt a code of ethics” for all public officials in the state. In 1992, the state Supreme Court unanimously upheld that authority. In 1993, the justices unanimously affirmed the commission’s “revolving door” prohibition and the legislature’s more expansive “revolving door” law," said West. "A compromise might require a six of nine commissioners to approve any new rule for public officials."

West offered thoughts on what another compromise could be.

"A third possible compromise might allow some “jury trial” process for public officials found to have violated the law. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee supported such language at a recent hearing, but citizen advocacy groups opposed it. Currently, eleven states allow an appeal to a jury, while 24, including Rhode Island, do not," said West. "In a year when presidential candidates shout that the system is rigged against ordinary people, Speaker Mattiello and Senate President Paiva Weed know how important it will be to restore ethics accountability for the General Assembly."
 

 

Related Slideshow: Raimondo and Mattiello - Friction Going Into the 2016 Session

View Larger +
Prev Next

1)

HealthSource 

Mattiello has long questioned why little Rhode Island has its own health exchange. His questions center around scale, cost and long-term viability.  Raimondo had been defending the Chafee initiative, but the move of Anya Rader Wallack from her leadership position at HealthSource to Medicaid (right when open enrollment started, to boot) is one of the indications of Raimondo’s walk away.

As GoLocal reported in January, Walack’s program in Vermont ended up failing under her leadership

Now the question is, will Raimondo make the policy change in her budget or make Mattiello do the dirty work?

View Larger +
Prev Next

2)

Tolls

Raimondo has been the champion of an ever-changing funding scheme to rebuild Rhode Island’s infrastructure.

No one questions the need to rehab Rhode Island’s failed bridges and roads, but most everyone has raised questions about the constantly changing funding structure and the corresponding lack of disclosure. 

Raimondo’s request to legislative leaders has been to pass legislation -  and to trust her and her administration. Last session of the General Assembly the Senate functionally went along with the plan and the House held firm on wanting to see the numbers.

Now, it is six-months later and much of the plan has not been disclosed to legislative leaders, the public or the media.

View Larger +
Prev Next

3)

Irony of Transparency

For decades, Rhode Island Speakers have been wildly criticized for being all powerful, Machiavellian, and highly secretive, but in this unusual situation it is often that Mattiello is the open, responsive and proactive communicator. 

In contrast, Raimondo less than two months ago came under fire from the media and civil rights groups for secrecy, failing to respond to media inquiries, and non-responsiveness to public information requests. 

As GoLocal reported in October: 

Five organizations, including ACCESS/RI, American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Press Association, New England First Amendment Coalition,and League of Women Voters of Rhode Island, sent sharply wordedletter to Governor Gina Raimondo on Tuesday asking her to issue an executive order which calls on state agencies to "adopt a strong presumption in favor of disclosure in addressing public information requests.

Mattiello, unlike his predecessors, has been the voice of the voter asking for information and requesting greater transparency. 

View Larger +
Prev Next

4)

Election Year

The Democratic Governor enjoys a four-year term, but she needs the support of a legislature who is up for re-election with an electorate that is wildly dissatisfied with the direction of the country, the direction of the state, the performance of Congress. It is a Presidential election year which will only add to the volatility.

The Governor who only won the Democratic primary with 40% of the vote and then was elected last November with 40% off the vote hardly has the most powerful bully pulpit to speak from.

For many legislators the smart political step maybe to show independence and raise questions rather than to lock step with her.  

For Mattiello, this means he may need to give far greater latitude to legislators to vote freely.

View Larger +
Prev Next

5)

Raimondo a Lawyer and Venture Capitalist 

Raimondo is trained as an attorney and worked nearly her entire professional career as Venture Capitalist. Lots of Non-Disclosure Agreements, “paper the deal” with agreements and little disclosure.

This training is great for confidentiality as it relates to high stakes venture, but those skills become obstacles to governing in a Democracy during a period when the public demands transparency.

View Larger +
Prev Next

6)

 “I am better than you”

There is a growing sentiment among Democratic legislators that the Governor has a “I am better than you” attitude. Raimondo who was educated at Yale, Harvard and Oxford seems to intentionally or unintentionally exude superiority.

As one legislator told GoLocal at the request of anonymity, “The only thing worse than her being pompous is when she tries to act like she is ‘just like everyone else.’ It is insulting.”

The ramifications of the Governor and her staff’s tone is not lost on legislators. Top Raimondo confidant Representative Joe Shekarchi can only do “Shuttle-Diplomacy” so much. 

View Larger +
Prev Next

7)

Guns 

Raimondo has announced a series of initiatives to restrict gun ownership in Rhode Island. A corresponding pro-gun control campaign is being funded by Democratic heavy weight Mark Weiner and former Hasbro CEO Alan Hassenfeld.

Raimondo uses the issue of gun control as a fundraising trigger with her supporters. The initiative may be good political fundraising, but will put her at odds with Mattiello, who is a strong gun rights supporter who has received high scores for his voting record on from the gun rights organization.

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook