Governor’s Race: Who’s Got the Best Pension Plan?
Friday, October 08, 2010
A key dividing line in public pensions is between defined benefit and defined contribution plans. Traditionally public pensions have defined benefits—public employees are entitled to a benefit regardless of whether the state makes its annual payments into the system. In the other kind of plan, the amount put in is locked in—but the amount of the benefit is guaranteed. A 401(k) is often cited as an example of the latter.
Some say a defined contribution plan, or 401(k)s are better for the state budget since they about massive unfunded liabilities down the road. But critics raise concerns about the stability of benefits under a defined contribution plan.
Three of the candidates go for some kind of a hybrid between 401(k)s and traditional pensions— independent Lincoln Chafee, Democrat Frank Caprio, and Republican John Robitaille. The plan weighed most heavily toward 401(k)s is the one proposed by Republican John Robitaille. Surprisingly, pro-business Moderate Party Ken Block would not introduce 401(k)s. Instead, Block would maintain a full public pension program. But, the catch is that he would modify how benefits are calculated, based such factors as retirement age or cost of living adjustments, or COLAs.
So how do their plans compare?
- Robitaille Calls for ‘Freeze’ on Public Pensions
- The Sweetest Pension Deal
- Councilman Warns $1.2 Billion Pension Liability Could Get Worse
- GoLocal Investigation Uncovers More Sweet Pension Deals
- GoLocalProv Investigation Uncovers 25 Illegal Pensions in Johnston
- Kerry King Addresses Pension Reform
- Lynch Blasts Cicilline on Pension Crisis
- Providence Mayoral Candidates Tackle Pension Costs