| | Advanced Search


Ric Santurri: Solomon – Do As I Say, Not As I Do—As the Democratic primary for Mayor of Providence…

LISTEN: 72% of 2014 Gubernatorial Campaign Expenditures Spent Out of State—While each candidate for Governor talks about creating…

Gary Sasse: Are Gubernational Candidates Being Realistic and Focused?—As Rhode Island enters the homestretch of the…

Chef Walter’s Flavors + Knowledge: Blueberry Crisp—Blueberry crisp is a popular comfort-dessert, relatively simple…

Brewed Awakenings in Warwick To Open in September—Brewed Awakenings' fifth and largest coffee house will…

Tufts Health Plan and Radio Disney Brought Magic of Healthy Living to Pawtucket—Tufts Health Plan and Radio Disney AM 1260…

RI Groups Urge Police to Support Public’s Right to Record Police Activity—Nine local organizations have asked police departments across…

Fun, Fun, Fun - Beach Boys Play Newport—A spirited crowd filled the Newport Yachting Center…

Organize + Energize: 10 Ways to Make Your Mornings Easier—How many of you rush around in the…

Dear John: Does He Have a Secret Life?—She found lipstick in his car...


Travis Rowley: Unions are Not Dead

Saturday, June 16, 2012


While a number of local progressives have recently decided that unions have lost their influence over the RI Democratic Party, some of us knew better. And this week’s GoLocalProv story regarding the state budget and organized labor served to dispel this false reality.

It was almost as if these progressive pundits forgot what the NEA-RI divulges on its own website, that each year the union assembles a “legislative program” that is subjected to the union’s “Legislative Commission,” which “recommends possible changes” and then “reviews and decides positions on approximately 400 bills per General Assembly session.” Then they “lobby extensively to insure that the NEA-RI legislative goals are realized.”

You know, just like you and your family. No different.

For some, it was no surprise this week when GoLocalProv reported that, in addition to “several pieces of legislation backed by education reformers,” a “spike in the minimum wage,” “increased spending on education,” “the restoration of funding for the developmentally disabled,” and the “death of the Governor’s municipal relief package” were all “major coups” for organized labor.

Community Organizing

It’s also important to remember the radical character of union activism. Last year, reacting to the business leaders who helped fund the group EngageRI during the controversy over state pension reform, local labor religionist Patrick Crowley – the NEA-RI’s “Government Relations Specialist” – boasted over the unions’ power and devotion to their agenda: “The reason [CEOs] opened up their wallets isn’t because they wanted to save Rhode Island – it’s because they are now afraid of us and what we can do politically. And they should be.”

Crowley was referring to the machine politics of organized labor, the type of militant community organizing that conservatives have simply never been able to duplicate – and, frankly, aren’t interested in. Conservatives want to go to work. They want to raise their families. They want to start businesses. They don’t exactly enjoy “government relations.” Most of them just want to be left alone.

Of course, that’s too much to ask of Patrick Crowley, an outright socialist who never misses an opportunity to rail against the “capitalist class.”

One of the best examples of Crowley’s preference for centralized economic planning just may be his argument in favor of increasing wages for government workers in order to increase wages for private sector workers. Despite the fact that this has been a failed experiment right here in Rhode Island, Crowley can’t help but make the case that higher taxes would somehow result in a boost to the “base pay for the area.” According to Crowley, “By cutting the benefits and pay of one set of workers it further erodes the pay structures for all workers.”

Listen, we’re going to tax you a little more this year so we can increase the wages for public school teachers. But don’t worry, your wages will increase as a result.

Worker Manipulation

While Crowley is devoted to economic delusions, he still has more of an understanding of the power of organized labor than some of his progressive allies. Last year, Crowley offered hope to the labor movement after the battle over pension reform: “A motivated and engaged membership base of thousands of rank-n-file activists who spent the last six months working through what was essentially a political boot camp is worth more than all their hoarded gold.”

As Crowley was openly flaunting his hostility for the wealthy and his Marxist economic perspective – that rich people “hoard” their money at the expense of others – he was also letting the taxpayers know what they could soon expect from organized labor. Crowley was expressing his confidence in the organizing prowess of local unions.

More notably, Crowley was expressing his understanding of the socialist spell that most union members are under. Crowley is hardly the only union boss who speaks of a “redistribution of wealth from the working class and middle class to the elites” – instruction aimed at union members informing them that they are somehow victims of other people’s freedom to control their own money.

The result of such ignorant propaganda is righteous indignation on the part of thousands of workers, who then allow themselves to be organized by the likes of Crowley.

Crowley’s outlook on union members is no different than that of Teamsters president Jimmy Hoffa Jr., who looked out over a sea of rallying workers last year and said, “President Obama, this is your army!”

Crowley’s outlook on union members is no different than the way his socialist allies from Netroots Nation view the rank-and-file: “More union members means a better progressive movement. You can’t have a successful progressive movement without a workers movement. It’s never been done in the history of progressive politics.”

For many labor leaders, it’s not about “workers’ rights.” It’s about a “progressive movement.”

Marxism and Labor

While technically an agent for public school teachers, Crowley not only fights for “better education funding,” but also for “issues like minimum wage increases, fixes to misclassification of workers…and tax equity.”

Crowley explained this week that these “pieces of legislation” are part of labor’s attempt to “build solidarity across the labor movement and with workers in general,” and to “make a positive impact in the lives of all working Rhode Islanders.”

Workers of the World, Unite!

Crowley is most certainly an intellectual disciple of Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the Marxist-revolutionary professors who in 1966 applauded “American workers [who] accepted and practiced the principle that each can benefit only as the status of workers as a whole is elevated…[Those who] bargained for collective mobility, not for individual mobility.”

In fact, there is no clear distinction between Crowley’s language and that of David Green, a leading member of the Democratic Socialists of America: “Our goal as socialists is to abolish private ownership of the means of production. Our immediate task is to limit the capitalist class’s prerogatives in the workplace…In the short run we must at least minimize the degree of exploitation of workers by capitalists. We can accomplish this by promoting full employment policies, passing local living wage laws, but most of all by increasing the union movement’s power.”

Dangerously Ideological

The time for being baffled by organized labor is over. Their kamikaze economic policies are rooted in a devotion to a failed philosophy – Marxist principles that include the redistribution of wealth, government control over industry, wealth without work, and a life without risk.

Union-Democrats are the only people who still reject the idea that the best condition for working men and women is to live within a society that offers as much opportunity as possible.

While it has been overwhelmingly accepted that Rhode Island’s dismal business climate is its biggest obstacle to prosperity, labor leaders stubbornly fight for business-stifling legislation such as increases to the minimum wage, new business taxes, tax hikes on “the rich,” and further regulation over the hiring process – all classic examples of central-planning interference that unavoidably results in hiring freezes, layoffs, and the lowering of wages.

But, according to the unions, all of this amounts to “standing up for the middle class.”

GoLocalProv reported this week that one of “the biggest wins for labor” this year was the defeat of Governor Chafee’s “set of legislation that would have freed up cash-strapped communities from several mandates and allowed them to freeze cost-of-living-adjustments (COLAs).” As a result, “now the outlook is bleak for the likes of Woonsocket, West Warwick and Pawtucket, three distressed communities the Governor targeted (in addition to Providence) for relief.”

Organized labor just pushed more towns closer to bankruptcy, forcing the fate of Central Falls onto more municipal workers and retirees.

“The working people of our state had a very productive legislative session,” concludes AFL-CIO President George Nee.

Travis Rowley (TravisRowley.com) is chairman of the RI Young Republicans and author of The RI Republican: An Indictment of the Rhode Island Left.


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


the labor movement was hijacked by marxist theorists YEARS AGO. One day you'll all wake up. By then it will be too late.

Comment #1 by Jared D on 2012 06 16

"The time for being baffled by organized labor is over. Their kamikaze economic policies are rooted in a devotion to a failed philosophy – Marxist principles that include the redistribution of wealth, government control over industry, wealth without work, and a life without risk."

Well done, Mr. Rowley.

Comment #2 by William Suffik on 2012 06 16

I have only a one word response to Patrick Crowley's view of things; "Greece!"

Comment #3 by Greg Passant on 2012 06 16

Patrick Crowley's title at NEARI is "Government Relations Director." Just a fact. Some of us like facts.

Comment #4 by Jonathan Flynn on 2012 06 17

@Jonathan Flynn

You should probably call up the NEARI and let them know then.

From the NEARI's website - http://www.neari.org/AboutNEARI/ContactUs/NEARIOfficersStaff/tabid/165/Default.aspx

Government Relations Specialist
Patrick Crowley
[email protected]

Comment #5 by Jared D on 2012 06 17

Don't say anything, Mr. Flynn. Just walk away.

Comment #6 by William Suffik on 2012 06 17

I happen to be holding his business card in my hands. Trump.

Comment #7 by Jonathan Flynn on 2012 06 17

Flynn is a huge idiot. This is what he does....he turns things into petty disputes.

"Just a fact. Some of us like facts." ....seriously, what a jackass. Thanks, Jared, for exposing this geek.

Comment #8 by Chris O. on 2012 06 17

There is much more of a future for this State under the ideas espoused by Mr. Rowley than there are under the failed ideas of Mssrs. Crowley and Flynn. We have many years of experience to show how the union mentality is ruining this State. Some of us like facts, too

Comment #9 by Michael Trenn on 2012 06 17

As far as claiming credit for the restoration of about a third of the funds that the Labor-backed Governot took from those with Developmental Disablities, well, I guess I am shocked at the Chutzpah of that claim. The DD community was sacrificed so that cuts did not have to be made to unionized state employment. They have been devastating. I have some contacts in the DD community I see the effects of the liberal budget. It's like the freakin USSR, man. They cut money, and then deny the ability to make changes that would mitigate the cuts. Like the unions, state government wants it both ways. It was the efforts of the largley non-unionized DD agencies themselves that resulted in restoration, not the tender mercies of the unions themselves

Comment #10 by Michael Trenn on 2012 06 17

You people make me laugh.

Comment #11 by Jonathan Flynn on 2012 06 17

Jonathan, you look like such a fool right now. You should have just walked away like William suggested.


PS - So which is it? Is Crowley a specialist, or a director?? Come on, guys. Jonathan needs to know. He likes facts.

Comment #12 by Jared D on 2012 06 17

Flynn likes to dig holes for himself apparently.

Michael, that's a great observation about DD funding. The thing to keep in mind is that the government unions are actually allied with the progressive welfare activists...ie Ocean State Action, etc...Which is strange, because they're both always trying to eat from the same trough. They SHOULD be political enemies. One is for the "workers." And one of for the "non-workers." But the one thing they have in common is a belief in redistribution. They think they can tax the rich enough to a point where they will both be satisfied.

Comment #13 by Chris O. on 2012 06 17

Blah, blah... Marxism. Blah, blah... Cloward/Piven. Yawn. Does the RI right has nothing more to offer?

Comment #14 by Russ C on 2012 06 18

Great argument as always, Russ. A profound retort!

PS --- does the ri left have anything more to offer other than socialism?

Comment #15 by Chris O. on 2012 06 18

Looks like Russ is tired of reading things he can't argue with. lol.

Comment #16 by Jared D on 2012 06 18

Seriously, look at the picture of Travis. I think someone is joking....

Comment #17 by Malachi Constant on 2012 07 14

Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.