Welcome! Login | Register | | Advanced Search

 

NEW: Landmark, Rehabilitation Hospital Acquisition Moves Forward—New decisions from HEALTH...

LEGAL MATTERS: Does Your Car Insurance Really Cover You?—You may meet the RI minimum, but that…

NEW: Brown Named Top 10 University to Work For in US—New ranking puts Brown at the very top...

Dear John: His Girlfriend Wants a Girlfriend, Too—Is he willing to share her with another...…

Teens’ TV Time Linked to Unhealthy Eating—New research points to a potential factor in…

Boys & Girls Clubs of Providence Names 2012 Alumni Hall of Fame—Active in B&G Clubs during their youth...

Food Truck Festivals of New England Coming to Newport—The best eating on 4 wheels...

Red Sox Report: Yankees’ Problems Similar To Boston’s—tied for last with Sox in AL East

Coaching decision at Brown coming soon—Bears' basketball head coach to be named...

NEW: Nurse Suspended for Over-Prescribing Adderall, Ritalin, Xanax—Levels of 2x to 3x recommended dosages...

 
 

The Best and Worst Campaigns

Friday, November 05, 2010

 

What was the best election campaign? The worst? GoLocalProv asked its MINDSETTERS™—Republicans, Democrats, and independents—to weigh in. Here is what they had to say.

BEST CAMPAIGNS

Gina Raimondo - No one ever was even close to providing a serious challenge to her in either a primary or general election, which is impressive given that she was a first-time candidate and had some liabilities as a venture capitalist. She basically cleared the field from the start as an inspiring woman candidate with amazing fundraising prowess. Her campaign worked hard—and it paid off, with Raimondo getting a higher percentage and a greater number of votes than any other statewide Democratic candidate. A rising star in the Democratic Party, she has a bright future ahead of her.

Best Campaign and Best Rookie - John Loughlin He had the perfect blend of grassroots on the ground accessibility in his district combined with effective multi-media exposure. He was well versed in the issues and never tripped up in the debates. He was responsive, organized and flexible. He stood his ground and appeared confident in his humorous, yet direct retorts to some of his opponent’s accusations. His only real mistake: being slow out of the box after the primary and going socially conservative. Why? Were Tea Party folks really going to vote for Cicilline?

Best campaign that wasn’t a campaign - Bob Healey Charmed the GOP into embracing his historic stance on the Lieutenant Governor position and made it part of the fiscal fitness mantra that the GOP extols. He received more votes than Chafee and he was effective in his media appearances—especially when he exposed Roberts' chief of staff as making $165,000. Ended up winning more votes than Chafee and gave Roberts a run for her money. Not too bad for a guy who spent only $10,000 and didn't have a staff.

Lincoln Chafee - Surprisingly gaffe-free for a candidate known for his misstatements and off-the-cuff style. He somehow even managed to turn the J.R. Pagliarini story against the Caprio camp by turning the focus onto the leaking of J.R.'s personal information. Overcame some silly Schilling statements about the sock and turned it on Caprio—may be the key to the momentum shift.

State Rep Deb Ruggiero - In a district that had been represented by a Republican for more than 25 years before her 2008 victory, Ruggiero cruised to a convincing win in 2010, more than 15 points ahead of her GOP opponent and winning more than 51 percent in a three-way race in a district that likely did not give that high a vote total to any statewide Democrat except Raimondo, proving that aggressive campaigning and personal contact is the key to state legislative campaigns.

Catherine Taylor - No one knew her. Convinced everyone she was smart, tough, and energetic. With a break here or there would have won by 5 points. Likely threat for Congress or Governor in 2012 or 2014 respectively. Watch out boys.

Peter Kilmartin - One of the few legislative leaders ever to break out and win statewide. Not since Bob Weygand ran as a committee chair for Congress has someone gone from a leadership position and won (Kennedy and Langevin were both “outsiders” in the power structure). Ran the perfect primary and then benefited from Little and McKenna sucking votes away from Wallin.

Honorable Mention - David Cicilline Stayed on message, escaped the Providence chaos, and held on against Loughlin’s late push.

WORST CAMPAIGNS

Absolute Worst - Kerry King It's a tie with the other worst campaign in recent Rhode Island history—King’s campaign for lieutenant governor in 2006. King played golf all summer and did nothing on his campaign. On second thought, maybe it wasn’t the worst campaign because there was no campaign. Bright side—he won every vote at Point Judith and the Dunes Club.

Frank Caprio - How the heck can the best-funded, no primary contest, statewide name recognition candidate lose this race? He was the leader, but didn’t act like the leader. He was reactive when he should have scoffed off the competition and held the high ground. He should have said “SHOVEL IT” as he was the one who dug the hole. If he had acted like the Governor, he would have won.

RI Clean Slate - The whole GOP effort to “throw the bums out” was a flop. They toppled a grand total of four General Assembly incumbents—Carter, Rice, and Pollard in the House, and Levesque in the senate—and have fewer seats in the upcoming term than they did even from 2007 to 2008. Guess those obscure bus signs were a waste of $100,000. Compare that to the nine Democratic House incumbents who lost their seats in primaries. By the way, not a single one of those nine seats went to Republicans in November.

The Three Write-in Stooges - Mary Ann Shallcross Smith, Doug Gablinske, and Al Gemma. Memorable? Apparently not enough for voters in their district to write in the names of these three sore Democratic primary losers.

Honorable Mention - Moderate Party Candidates Ran on change, but de facto sucked the votes away from challengers and helped the Democratic AG candidate and the Chafee campaign.

Most Boring Campaign – Liz Roberts In a race that drew a cast of colorful characters - Cool Moose Bob Healey, cable show host Bob Venturini, and Red Sox executive Jeremy Kapstein - Roberts kept things ho-hum. But that ad with the “Jaws” music did spice things up a little bit near the end of her campaign.
 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Bob Curley

Good analysis overall except that the idea of blaming a third party for the defeat of one of the major ones is tired. It's not the job of the Moderate Party to protect the interests of the state GOP. Anyway, if anyone was to blame for taking votes away from Robitaille it would be (former Republican) Lincoln Chafee!

guy smily

The Moderate Party gets full credit for Chafee and Kilmartin. Without them taking votes Robitaille and Wallin would have won. It was proven in the short term, and it will be proven in the long term that the Moderate Party will only take votes away from Republicans. The Democrats get their base from the union vote...THAT IS A FACT. I give Mr. Block full credit for Lincoln Chafee. The Democrats are thrilled the Moderate Party is around. Conservative voters did not vote for Lincoln Chafee because he is liberal. Bob your argument is not valid. In the end the Moderate Party will go the way of the Reform Party.

Roy Parson

________________________________________

While it may be argued that the dispassionate point of view and narrow focus of this analysis are wholly appropriate for the genre, we nonetheless are herein presented with a textbook example of how, in at least one observed instance, deft technique in service to a dishonorable agenda is deemed praiseworthy.

I give you the following:

“Honorable Mention - David Cicilline Stayed on message, escaped the Providence chaos, and held on against Loughlin’s late push.”

Perhaps the Mindsetters will explain in precise detail what is so “honorable” about David Cicilline’s successful efforts to obscure his chaotic, tragically inept, often dishonorable, and likely criminal stewardship of Providence.

Where can one discern “honor” in the established fact that David Cicilline repeatedly lied about his mayoral record throughout the Primary and General Election campaigns?

How does “honor” accrue to David Cicilline for staying on a “message” that was nothing more than a fictive construct – a total fabrication designed to mislead and, in the case of our elders, terrorize uninformed, unengaged voters?

Jonathan Flynn

If your face is on a bus, you will lose. I've never seen a winner yet.

Roy Parson

___________________________

The greyhound did well for decades.

Donn Roach

Roy,

It was an "honorable" mention for best campaign. In other words, it got nominated but didn't quite get there due to the performance of the other candidates. Your use of the term "honor" doesn't fit the context.

No one implied Cicilline is honorable, but that he ran the right type of campaign to win ergo an honorable mention for Best Campaign.

don

Roy Parson

________________________________

Don,

I appreciated the distinction you draw before I made my post.

Perhaps I can clarify my position: I lament the ubiquity of realpolitik-inspired analyses of significant governance-related matters that almost by definition eschew deeper contemplation of attendant moral issues.

No matter how discomforted you might be with the assignation, the Mindsetters have conferred distinction upon – or, as you seem to prefer, honored – David Cicilline for his abilities to misrepresent his record as mayor of Providence and otherwise lie to, terrorize, and mislead 1st District voters.

As cold, cynical political analysis, your methodology seems sound enough. But its application and its unambiguously stated conclusion, presented in a moral vacuum, serve to preserve and protect the materialist point of view most succinctly expressed as “the one with the most toys (or electoral victories, in this case) wins.”

In terms of the sub-title of your Cicilline analysis – “Honorable Mention – David Cicilline” – three little letters and one little hyphen up front would have changed everything for the better:

"Dis-"

Roy Parson

___________________________

As for this Orwellian "Mindsetters" bit:

The LAST THING the American electorate needs is to surrender what's left of its collective cognitive abilities to those who are all to eager to set others' minds.

I'd prefer the title of "Mind Unsettler."

Anyone with me on this?

Roy Parson

__________________________________________

Apparently not.

Apparently you’re all content to have the Go Local Prov Mindsetters -- and God knows who else -- do just that to you.

Apparently you disagree with these sentiments:

More than anything the United States needs effective citizens competent to do their own thinking. -- William Mather Lewis

If those in charge of our society - politicians, corporate executives, and owners of press and television - can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves. -- Howard Zinn

I have as much authority as the Pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it. – George Carlin

One more time: Mind Unsettlers, anyone?




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.