| | Advanced Search

 

RI State Report: Made in RI + Tax Incentives to Live Healthier—could you get a break from Uncle Sam…

Travis Rowley: Obama’s Failed Vision of Government—And what this week's lessons hold...

Beauty: 6 Easy Steps To Summer-Worthy Legs—get ready for skirts and shorts

John Rooke - Thinking Out Loud—JR's column on the sports stories and personalities…

Election Preview 2014: Who’s Running for What—Election Preview 2014: Who's Running for What?

Side of the Rhode: Who’s Hot and Who’s Not in RI Politics?—Who's up, who's down?...

5 Great Spring Hikes in RI’s Wildest Places—Get wild in RI's refuges this weekend...

Rhode Island’s Biggest PowerBall Winners—We've all got Powerball fever...

Up Close With Rhode Island Boxer Shelito Vincent—-- the undefeated inspiration

The Cellar: Pinot Noir—Both under $25...

 
 

Rowley: Enough is Enough. End Collective Bargaining

Friday, July 01, 2011

 

“They are government organized as an interest group to lobby itself for ever-larger portions of wealth extracted by the taxing power from the private sector. Increasingly, government workers are the electoral base of the party of government.” – George Will, Newsweek (May 17, 2010)

Rhode Island’s government employees should once-and-for-all be stripped of their ability to force Rhode Islanders to meet them at negotiating tables. Organizing as a group is one thing. Utilizing the power of law to coerce those who are intended to be free citizens to negotiate with that group is quite another.

Government jobs are made available for the purposes of serving the people, not to create a protected class of self-declared victims of workplace oppression, inflicted with an outlook of entitlement and victimhood, and armed with the authority to pick the pockets of Rhode Island taxpayers.
In the 1930s the liberal icon and champion of organized labor Franklin Roosevelt argued, “Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relations and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government. The process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service.”

Today, however, we live under the precise social design that Roosevelt warned of. For almost five decades, government employees have been afforded the right to organize against – and negotiate with – the taxpayers.
Absent any fear of being fired by the people or their representatives, government employees continuously threaten the people with strikes, lawsuits, and work-to-rule measures. In the meantime, their Democratic allies within the General Assembly pass laws that strengthen their bargaining position. The legalization of public unions simply modified the masters of civil authority. Public unions would now rule the day. A “government of the people, by the people, for the people” became an antiquated notion.

Rhode Islanders now find themselves oppressed by a system that forces them to pay government employees arbitrary salaries and benefits, who then direct union dues to union coffers. The original taxpayer cash is then used to fund the campaigns of slutty politicians, who agree to continue raising taxes and enacting policies that will sustain and enhance the labor kingdom.

You heard that correctly: Taxpayers are forced to fund public labor’s war against the taxpayers.

With union advocates sitting on both sides of the bargaining table, it’s difficult to deny that the legalization of public unions established for Rhode Islanders a government of the public unions, by the public unions, and for the public unions.

A Huge Mistake
It only took several decades for progressives to surmount Roosevelt’s wisdom. In was in 1966 when Rhode Island’s Democratic legislature bestowed collective bargaining privileges upon public workers. They did this despite the caution issued by Republican Governor John Chafee, who wrote a letter to the General Assembly recognizing the “organizational problems inherent where the machinery designed for private industry is imposed on State employees.” Collective bargaining for state employees would “inevitably” lead to “bad relationships between…employees and the State” resulting in “the public [being] the loser.”

Could anything have been more prophetic than Chafee’s letter? Almost every political dispute in Rhode Island these days involves public unions. And forty years after Chafee’s letter, has the public been “the loser?” In 2009 the Providence Journal editorialized, “The cost of government, notably in benefits for public employees…has risen much faster than the public’s ability to pay for it.” And just this week CNBC ranked Rhode Island “the worst state to do business.”

But that probably has nothing to do with the high tax rates needed to uphold government employee contracts. It probably has nothing to do with the fact that Rhode Island has one of the highest rates of public sector unionization (62% compared to the national average of 37%).

Labor’s Legal Extortion

Labor leaders make some interesting arguments, though. Executive Director of the NEARI Bob Walsh has argued that the tax-hiking legislation known as binding arbitration “saves [taxpayers] money, actually, in reduced legal fees.”
The people might as well give government unions what they want, because Bob Walsh is just going to keep suing them if they don’t.

Walsh’s tactics are hardly rare among public labor leaders. A spokesman for New York’s private unions recently complained about his job-killing public counterparts: “They won’t take concessions. They’ll sue. They’ll sue. They’ll sue.”
Walsh has recently reiterated his position, insisting that binding arbitration would mean “no strikes, no work-to-rule, no disruption of the education environment…It will bring labor peace and let teachers teach and just focus on the kids.”

Walsh’s comments are nothing short of admissions that he and other public labor leaders have been shaking down the taxpayers for years with threats of judicial violence, and intentionally providing sub-par education to their children. 

The power being exerted over the people is appalling. If they want “labor peace,” it’s evident that they’ll have to buy it from Bob Walsh. Rhode Islanders should put an end to this right now.

Travis Rowley (TravisRowley.com) is chairman of the RI Young Republicans, and a consultant for the Barry Hinckley Campaign for US Senate. 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Bryan Sullivan

“They are government organized as an interest group to lobby itself for ever-larger portions of wealth extracted by the taxing power from the private sector. Increasingly, government workers are the electoral base of the party of government."

THIS is the problem. They are the party of government (Democrats). Public unions should be OUTLAWED!!............But it will never happen in Democratic rhode islnad

Sierra Lee

Mr. Travis, stop making so much sense.

Tom R.

Taxpayers pay Bob Walsh's salary. Bob Walsh then turns around and sues the taxpayers whenever there's a dispute concerning teachers' pay. What a country! Keep 'em comin', Travis!

Jade ellis

Republican Joseph Trillo stood up yesterday and praised Democrat House Speaker Gordon Fox on his frist full year as speaker. It's called working together UNITY Travis, not the young hate group you kiddies are trying to form.

Lance Chappell

Couldn’t agree more. Jack Welch from GE made the best observation about public unions. “There is no such thing as collective bargaining in the public sector. It should be called coercive bargaining. Walsh, Crowley, Nee and company represent what I would call the “Public Enemy Number 1" to the taxpayers. Public unions are destroying government as we know it. They have turned the public lawbook into their union bylaws book. Perhaps the best way to stop all of this nonsense is to file legislation that would strip municipalities of the right to levy property. With that guaranteed money flow taken away, government officials would have to listen to the taxpayers. But, we would have to get that past the very people we are trying to oust. The taxpayers are in a “catch 22" and are paying for it.

Nick Patriarca

how about not allowing these special interest general assembly members recusing from all mstters in which there is a conflict of interest . this includes union reps , teachers , attorneys and their spouses when they stand to benefit . there should be a concerted effort to define and enforce conflict of interest for the general assembly .
just for ri' s fiscal preservation and integrety .

John D Revelator

Tassoni sponsored the bill in the Senate and he's on the arbitrator list...a clear conflict of interest in any place other than the RI GA...you'd think it would be an ethics violation right? Oh yeah, that's right, in their infinite wisdom the GA has decided that they don't need no stinkin' ethics code. Just another day in the RI GA.

Kevin O'Connor

Oh yea? You racist, homophobic, woman-hating, government-bashing, young, smelly, ...mean head! (That's all I could come up with because your argument is so obviously correct.)

Will Collette

he same argument could be made for the Republican Party or the Chamber of Commerce. Are these not organized groups representing special interests? Do they not seek to bargain collectively? Do they not use every strategy and tactic available to them to promote their interests?

The Constitution guarantees and protects the rights of free speech, assembly, association and the right to petition the government for the redress of grieivances. Our state Constitution does so, as well. By what right would you strip one group of citizens of that right (i.e. public workers) while holding those rights sacred for others (i.e. business interests)?

John D Revelator

I'm not sure the analogy works...The Republican Party nor the Chamber of Commerce receive their funding directly from the taxpayers based on the discretion of our elected officials.

Bryan Sullivan

Will, i think you're misunderstanding something. Everyone has the right to assembly. Obviously. But this is what Rowley said: "Organizing as a group is one thing. Utilizing the power of law to coerce those who are intended to be free citizens to negotiate with that group is quite another."

It's fine to organize and lobby politicians. But no other group has the force of law behind them. It is the LAW that taxpayers must negotiate with government collective bargaining units. The taxpayers are FORCED to negotiate. And the law allows these unions to SUE the people. To FORCE them to pay more in taxes. This is what's objectionable. Are we in charge of our government or not?!

And we were warned about what would happen if we allowed this. The day of reckoning is upon us.

William Blackstone

The Travis Rawley Republic is now open for business. Must be nice to have such blind faith in fascism. But then again rich kids like Travis don't need to get their hands dirty. Look around, this country was built by people that struggled on basic wages. All Travis is doing is stoking the coals of hate so he can get more air time. Travis, get a life, get a real job.

Sierra Lee

W. Blackstone, you are such a loser. Fascism? Rich kid? Try disputing Rowley's arguments. This is why people can't stand liberals. There's never any substance behind their responses.

john paycheck

agreed sierra lee...the libs dont debate anything.....never any factual substance to the discussion...when you prove them wrong, they never respond....its just constant whining.....

for years, people took what they said at face value...now they are being being forced back up their arguements.

ciccilini is the classic case....

johnny jones

If Rowley hates unions so much, maybe he should ask his old man to give up his six figure pension from the state police. But where would he get his Twin Willows booze money?

Travis Two Face.




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.