Riley: Raimondo‘s Confused Tax Reform Priorities
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
The plan would work like this: towns create charitable funds and give homeowners a credit off their property tax bills for all or most of what they donate. The towns would use the donations for the same purposes as property taxes, such as schools and police and snowplows.
The homeowner would pay roughly the same amount. But on his or her federal tax return, the charitable contribution would not be subject to the new $10,000 cap that Republicans in Congress put on the deduction for state and local taxes in the law signed by President Donald Trump just before Christmas.
According to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, the average SALT deduction claimed in 2015 was $17,850 in New Jersey. Internal Revenue Service data shows it was $28,257 in Bergen County, where Gottheimer and Murphy made their announcement.
Governor Andrew Cuomo said “new opportunities for charitable contributions” was part of a multi-prong strategy he was planning to attack the deduction cap that also included a lawsuit and possibly changing state taxes imposed on employees to those imposed on employers, because businesses will continue to be able to deduct all state taxes.
Where is Rhode Island‘s Governor?
Gina Raimondo has been vociferously opposed to virtually any tax reform for months regardless of the plans final version. In late November she said “millionaires and billionaires are going to get a tax break, on average, of $50,000 a year,” citing numbers produced by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “If President Trump and his Republican friends really want to reform the tax code, they should put working families first.”
Despite the fact that home mortgage deductions and State Income taxes were surprisingly ultimately capped harming thousands of Rhode Island citizens,Raimondo seemed oblivious to the changes upon the final vote. Why are the other blue States like California, NY and NJ trying to address the mortgage cap and State income tax cap while Raimondo and Rhode Island remain silent? Is it because she got away again with the controversial “carried interest” deduction? How much was that little ditty worth to her and her insider buds? Seriously why is she never asked that? I run a hedge fund and don’t get “carried interest” treatment -- but she does?
As I have said before, the combination of the fact that Raimondo continues a top-down government style and her continued “boot on the throat" of Rhode Island business is a serious threat to Rhode Island when all the while Trumps America soars.
Rhode Island will still be standing on the sidelines afraid to return tax dollars to citizens while Providence sits on the verge of bankruptcy with an intransigent and incompetent Mayor. Meanwhile, Mayor Elorza works the back room of the State House for a bailout. Hence the latest $1 billion debt issuance for building new schools. This solution pushes Providence bankruptcy off of both Raimondo and Elorzas plate temporarily. Imagine how Providence finances could be helped if the rest of us paid for a rebuild of Providence and their schools. This will be done by billing State taxpayers, as the Governor proposes, through issuing a billion in State debt for a few schools is a cynical abuse of state taxpayers.
We can’t expect Raimondo to trust taxpayers with a return of their own dollars. For her, it's higher taxes and picking winners and losers. But just in case she continues to be wrong, I propose the Governor immediately to donate all her gains + carried interest for the 4 years she has improperly kept her investment in the State Pension plan. She should never have asked for an ethics ruling. She knew better and now she should contribute all her unethical, conflict-ridden money to a charity that supports either children and/or healthcare for the poor in Rhode Island.
Related Slideshow: GoLocal: Benchmark Poll, October 2017
Next year, in November of 2018, there will be a statewide general election for Governor and many other state offices. How likely is it that you will vote in this election?
Will you definitely be voting, will you probably be voting, are you 50-50...
Definitely be voting: 78%
Probably be voting: 13%
What would you say is the number one problem facing Rhode Island that you would like the Governor to address?
Jobs and economy: 21%
State budget: 9%
Corruption/Public integrity: .8%
Don’t know: .9%
Recently, a proposal has been made to permit the issuance of $81 million in bonds by the State to build a new stadium for the Pawtucket Red Sox. If there was an election today on this issue, would you vote to approve or reject issuing $81 million in financing supported moral obligation bonds to build the stadium?
Net: Approve: 28%
Definitely approve: 15%
Probably approve: 14%
Net: Reject: 67%
Probably reject: 19%
Definitely reject: 48%
Don't know: 4%
The next question is about the total income of YOUR HOUSEHOLD for the PAST 12 MONTHS. Please include your income PLUS the income of all members living in your household (including cohabiting partners and armed forces members living at home).
$50,000 or less: 27%
More $50,000 but less than $75,000: 13%
More $75,000 but less than $100,000: 13%
More $100,000 but less than $150,000: 17%
$150,000 or more: 13%
Don't know/refused: 17%
What particular ethnic group or nationality - such as English, French, Italian, Irish, Latino, Jewish, African American, and so forth - do you consider yourself a part of or feel closest to?
Black or African American: 6%
- Riley: When Will Rhode Island Retirees Get Truth About COLAs?
- Riley: St. Joseph Pension Collapse Was Negligence or Malfeasance by Kilmartin
- Riley: Misleading Municipal Investors in Providence
- Riley: Hey Hartford, Why Not Just Laugh at Bankruptcy, Like Elorza
- Riley: Rhode Island Receives a “D” from Truth In Accounting
- Riley: How to Fix Narragansett - And All RI Municipal Pension Issues
- Riley: Mayor Elorza Laughs at Municipal Black Hole
- Riley: China, Trump, and the Grey Rhino
- Riley: A Pension Fund Solution
- Riley: Forecasted 7 Year Returns From Top Analysts Spell Doom for RI Pensions
- Riley: Is Wall Street Fueling Rhode Island Pension Funds?
- Riley: Providence Finances in Dire Straights
- Riley: Bitcoins? Trust Those Who Know How to Play the Short Side
- Riley: Bitcoin Mania Could Turn Into a Fiat Currency Crisis
- Riley: Prov Property Tax Nightmare Could Spill Over to all Property Valuations
- Riley: Rhode Island to Contribute More to Pensions, Providence Still in Fantasy Land
- Riley: What Elorza Needs to Tell Us in 2018
- Riley: Bitcoin Rally is Just Beginning
- Riley: Why Doesn’t All of Rhode Island Use One Discount Rate?
- Riley: Magaziner Was Barely Alive Then, But I Lived Through 1987 Crash
- Riley: Connecticut Municipalities in Scramble With Hartford & Moody’s
- Riley: Buffett, Stock Market, and Bitcoin