Rhode Island Has the Worst-Funded Republican Party in America
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Despite a solid slate of candidates running for federal office (including one who held a double-digit lead over the Democratic incumbent as of March), Rhode Island has by far the worst-funded Republican Party in the country, according to a GoLocalProv review of federal campaign finance reports.
The state GOP had just $538 in its account as of June 30, more than 39 times less than any other state Republican Party and just under 3,100 times less than the amount Wisconsin (which leads the way with $ 1,667,602) held in its federal account.

Even in a year where Brendan Doherty appears to be the frontrunner in Rhode Island’s 1st Congressional District and 2nd District candidate Mike Riley and Senate candidate Barry Hinckley have all shown a willingness to make large personal contributions to their campaign, state GOP party chairman Mark Zaccaria indicated the party intends to focus on local races.
“We have dedicated ourselves to the General Assembly races here in Rhode Island,” Zaccaria said. “One of the reasons we have the lowest amount, nationally, in our Federal Operating and Federal Victory accounts is that we have the smallest staff of any of the state organizations. That is, our capacity to focus on fundraising for our federal candidates is limited.”
Zaccaria, who lost the party’s executive director Pat Sweeney earlier this year (he is now running Hinckley’s race), said another reason the party has such a tiny balance is that it doesn’t leave any money in its campaign account.

“Should a contribution come in, we try to make short work of parsing it out to the appropriate campaigns,” he said.
Zaccaria Received Zero Party Dollars
Zaccaria knows firsthand the struggles a candidate running for House or Senate can face with the state’s Republican Party. After the GOP failed to field a candidate to challenge Congressman James Langevin in 2006, he ran against the incumbent in both 2008 and 2010 and was trounced each time.
When Zaccaria became the party’s third chairman in less than a year last December, he was immediately made aware that errors in campaign finance reports dating back to 2002 showed just how little the Republicans had in their account. At the time, he said an audit proved that “human errors” caused a “$45,000 problem.” He also indicated that federal candidates were going to be on their own during the 2012 election cycle.
“It says to Barry Hinckley he’s not going to get much of a contribution from the RIGOP,” Zaccaria said. “And in my two runs for Congress, I believe I can give you exactly to the penny the total amount of support I got from the state Party. It was zero.”
A Serious Problem
While the lack of financial support from the party likely makes it more difficult for candidates running for office, both Doherty and Hinckley each raised more than $200,000 during the 2nd quarter that ended June 30. Doherty, who is challenging first-term Democrat David Cicilline in a district that overwhelmingly voted for President Obama in 2008, has been able to gain the support of prominent national Republicans, including House Speaker John Boehner and Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown.
Still, Darrell West, Vice President and Director of Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington D.C, said the GOP’s weak infrastructure in Rhode Island is another barrier for local Republicans.
“It is a serious problem that the Rhode Island Republican party gets virtually no help from the national committee,” West said. “This forces candidates to raise their own money and build their own infrastructure. Unless they have the ability to raise money or bankroll their own operations, it makes it very difficult for Republicans to be competitive in the Ocean State. “
The state GOP has said that its goal for 2012 is to win control of 45 seats in the General Assembly. The party is working closely with a group known as the Republican Strike Force, which helped to recruit dozens of candidates now running for the House or Senate.
Zaccaria: We’ll Get Some Money
Earlier this year, Riley, the Republican challenging Langevin this time around, said he trusts the work Zaccaria is doing as head of the party. Riley, who has said he is willing to spend over $1 million of his own money in an effort to unseat Langevin, said he supports the party’s local-first strategy.
“I am also confident that all Rhode Island voters are searching for leadership,” Riley said at the time. “They are no longer satisfied with just one party. They are keenly aware of those who participated in the ‘employee benefits bubble’ of the last two decades. They know which office holders have stood in the way of tax payer rights and those office holders who, instead stood strongly by their biggest contributors. I know Mark Zaccaria can and will lead this party and its state candidates in a successful effort to place more prudence and discipline in the statehouse."
Despite the lack of funds, Zaccaria remains upbeat and said he expects to raise at least some federal money during the election cycle. He said his hope is that the money doesn’t face any restrictions because the party’s small staff may struggle to oversee the efficient use of such funds.
“We may well receive some unrestricted federal money this cycle,” he said. “If we do we will get it off to one or more of our federal candidates toute de suite.”
Dan McGowan can be reached at dmcgowan@golocalprov.com.



Comments:
Michael Napolitano
8:52am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Misleading headline and story. This amount is based on one federal account as the RIGOP has four accounts. We are actually in the process of giving tens of thousands of dollars to our General Assembly candidates.
tom brady
9:12am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Ok Big Mike what is the total? Or is it top secret?
Rufus Mikatis
9:22am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
This is so untrue.Take for example just how active former mayoral candidate Dr. Dan Harrop meets with GOP loyalists and the fundraisers at posh waspish places and you just know the republicans have LOTS more $$ than what is reported here. I believe this with the same level of credibility as Mitts alleged involvement with Bain. How naive.
Mark Zaccaria
9:38am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
The focus of the article on the federal operations of a state political party belies a misunderstanding of the roles of the various arms of the Republican (and Democrat) efforts nationwide. The role of the RI GOP is to sponsor and support Republican Candidates for the Rhode Island General Assembly. In point of fact we are doing that right now by processing more than $30k in recently raised unrestricted state donations, parsing that money out this week to all of our vetted candidates for the RI House and Senate.
Presidential candidates are sponsored and supported by the RNC or DNC, respectively. Republican candidates for the US House and Senate are the responsibility of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) or the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC). Each state party maintains two federal accounts and must document the funds it handles, segregating state expenditures from those for federal efforts. Since Federal Operations are an adjunct matter at best for the state party it should be little wonder that our federal account balances pale by comparison to those for state operations.
This article seems to draw the conclusion that Rhode Island is the smallest State in the Union. To use Claude Rains’ line from the classic film, Casablanca, “I’m Shocked, Ricky, Shocked.”
Rhonda Bennett
10:03am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
New headline and story needed. Rhode Island has the most biased/liberal media in the US.
Harold Stassen
11:50am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Not surprising that GoLocal would choose to write a story with a negative slant towards the Repubs. Fact is, if the Republicans (or any other party for that matter) want to develop into a viable alternative, they have to build from the ground up. But let's be clear, based on past history, the Repubs have done a pretty poor job. My concern is not party related whatsoever, but rather giving voters a viable alternative to the Democratic drones at the assembly who do the leaderships bidding with their green thumbs.
Dan McGowan
12:28pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
I'm really not sure how this is bias reporting. The facts are the facts. If I was writing about local accounts, I'd have said so. The first graf literally explains in clear detail what I was looking at.
"...Rhode Island has by far the worst-funded Republican Party in the country, according to a GoLocalProv review of federal campaign finance reports."
Francis Stack Jr.
12:44pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
But the RI Democratic party is so far right on issues from right to life, voter ID, no taxes and small government that the Republicans have to place to go but support the RI Democratic party line, erect crosses on public land and fight the unions.
Mark Smiley
12:49pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Yes if Warren Buffet had 4 accounts and you looked at the one that only had $500 in it, would you have written an article saying he was broke? No, you'd assume he had billions in some other account. RI GOP doesn't have billions, but this is bias reporting at best.
Dan McGowan
1:21pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Mark,
This isn't just some side account. This is your party's federal campaign account. When you have 39 times less than the next lowest state on the list, it's newsworthy.
I've been more than fair to you guys on the state level and I'm giving your candidates a platform to tell the state why they're running on our site. The idea that I have some agenda against you guys is laughable.
Dan
dmcgowan@golocalprov.com
Mark Smiley
1:45pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Dan, your bias comes out when you report half the story. That account is used to fund either advertising in support of Federal Candidates OR to offset operational expenses while supporting Federal Candidates (depends on which one you are looking at). It hasn't been used since Linc Chafee got a pile of money from the National Republican Senate Committee in 2005-2006 while fighting Steve Laffey in the primary and then Sheldon Whitehouse in the General. If the National Republican Senate or Congressional Campaigns decided to give the RI GOP money to support any of our candidates, that's where it would go. They haven't so the account is almost empty.
Dan McGowan
2:04pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
And so is the local Republican party ready to take the national party to task for its lack of support? Because it sounds like that's who you're blaming?
I'll write that story too if that's what you guys want.
Dan
dmcgowan@golocalprov.com
Captain Blacksocks
2:16pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
I think you should all cut the reporter some slack. It's not biased against the RI Republican party. It's just stating the fact the the RI republican party is very poorly funded and generally ignored by most RI voters...sadly. The article can do some good by convincing RI republicans that they ought to start contributing to candidates to counteract the massive contributions the dems get from every manner of special interest group and public employee union.
Harold Stassen
2:49pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Sorry Mr. McGowan but it looks like you are trying to rationalize this article. Given Mr. Zaccaria's explanation it certainly appears to be one sided. Regrettably, this is the type of reporting that turns off many fair minded folks. As previously stated, Repubs have not done a good job tilling the fields to generate credible candidates. This year, based on Mr. Zaccaria's comments, they are trying to get it right. All I know is I want some options (Repubs, Moderates, etc.).
I'm tired of the same old nonsense at the State House and no, gay-marriage is not the most important issue RI is facing.
Mark Smiley
2:51pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
You are still not getting it. That account exists for money they may or may not give us. It's not used for anything else. We do not actively raise money for that account. We are required by Federal Election law to have and maintain the existence of that account, but we don't have much use for it unless the National Party decides to spend money here.
christine spaziano
3:01pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
I have to say I am not sure where the bias is in this story. I ran for office, as a Republican in 2008. I attended a class at Alpine Country Club through the party. We were told if we attended ALL the meetings, we would receive money at the end.
We all received a letter that no money was available. We received free "Robo Calls". I was offered a mailing that was outrageous and distasteful regarding my opponent so I refused to send it out.
In that room there were many "Viable" candidates. I am thankful to those that did donate to me - one of which was the Providence Republicans, however even then I had to fight and defend myself to receive money that was promised to me.
There was no money that came from the National GOP or the local GOP. Maybe I wasn't "viable" enough. Funny, they might have told me that prior to me running for office. Things might have changed but I would be interested where the " tens of thousands of dollars to our General Assembly candidates" is coming from. Maybe they are just viable.
Dan McGowan
3:01pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
I'm not disputing that Mr. Zaccaria may have a different strategy. I'm simply reporting how Rhode Island compares to the rest of the country.
I'm sure every state has its own strategy but the fact remains: Every state party has at least 39 times the amount Rhode Island's GOP has. That's not a small disparity. That's an enormous one.
I'm sure there are perfectly credible candidates running for local offices and I'm sure we'll cover them plenty in the coming months. But this story is 100 percent accurate.
Thanks so much for reading, everyone.
Dan
dmcgowan@golocalprov.com
Donnn Roach
4:56pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
RI probably has the most underfunded Republican party because all of the money went to GoLocal(FoxNews)Prov and Engage RI.
Don't worry.
With Democrats like Baldelli-Hunt, Brien and Raimondo, who needs Republicans?
Max Diesel
5:36pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
The 4:56pm fraudulent post should be removed. I don't care how the name is spelled. Impersonations should be deleted.
Michael Gardiner
6:04pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Hey I think out raised the party on this one! On the bright side the GOP still has a ballot position and every candidate the opportunity to get their message out and help the effort as long as the press doesn't make money the sole test of legitimacy. Okay that last part could be a problem.
Ralph Jones
8:16pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Stop the presses. The republican party in the most democrat state has the worst funding? No way jose!
Tomorrows headline:
Pope is Catholic
Michael Napolitano
11:31pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012
The story is a case of bias by omission. The fact that the Republican Party has money and is giving money to candidates running for the RI General Assembly is left out. The article gives the impression that the party is broke. In addition the photo and the dramatic headline area also a form of media bias. The public has no idea that the RIGOP has 4 accounts and what they are used for. That should have been explained in the story.
Of course there were those who took advantage of this story and chose just to attack the GOP here in the comments section. Why , because the Democrats have done such a great job over the last 70 years? That is why we are ranked 50th for business, number 2 for unemployment, and get a D- in transparency. Shall I go on? The Democrats have had absolute power and this is what they have done with it. Most of them cave to whatever the leadership wants. Is that what people want, a political system grossly dominated by one party for decades?
Even Senator Rhoda Perry commented on Newsmakers this week “I think it's good to bring new people into the legislature with new ideas with new sets of expertise and skills and growing energy. I think it is good having two parties."
Special thanks to Anchor Rising for writing about the real story and the fact that the party is about to distribute $30,000 to candidates, which is in addition to the assistance they have already been given. It is much different this year than in the past. For the candidate that stated promises were made to her in 2008, I hear you loud and clear. That guy is gone and those days are far behind us.
Now lets see if Go Local Prov even follows up to report about he money and services being given to candidates by the RIGOP.
Harold Stassen
9:54am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Mr. Napolitano raises very valid points regarding the state's current/past leadership. As previously written, many voters are looking for options. Let's see what the Republicans (or Moderates-Mr. Block, Greens, etc. ) have to offer. For me, the same old same old is off the table. Anyone who cannot see the results of one party domination in this state needs to go to an optometrist, ASAP.
Gary Trott
10:35am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012
"One of the reasons we have the lowest amount, nationally, in our Federal Operating and Federal Victory accounts is that we have the smallest staff of any of the state organizations. That is, our capacity to focus on fundraising for our federal candidates is limited." - Mark Zaccaria
If they were trying to hide which account they were talking about they sure messed up bad by printing this quote. Should GoLocalProv.com have mentioned that there were other accounts with funds in them for supporting statewide candidates? Probably...but in my opinion this article doesn't seem to be intentionally biased against the GOP.