Moore: I Still Think Clinton Wins RI Tomorrow

Monday, April 25, 2016

 

View Larger +

Most pundits disagree, but I believe former First Lady, US Senator, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will win the Democratic Presidential Primary in Rhode Island tomorrow night.

During a recent CNN broadcast, John King, CNN's National Correspondent (a University of Rhode Island graduate), said "we'll give RI to Bernie Sanders", when analyzing the delegate race. 

"How nice of him," I thought.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Let's face it: the Bernie Sanders campaign has been nothing short of impressive, and the passion of his supporters is commendable, but in the end, I believe he will come up short in Little Rhody, regardless of King and other pundits thoughts to the contrary. 

Rhode Island has been Clinton Country for about 20 years running now. Since 1996, every time there has been a Clinton on the ballot in Rhode Island, he or she has prevailed. That phenomena was highlighted by our last Presidential Primary, in 2008. In that race, Hillary Clinton bested Barack Obama by almost 20 percentage points.

I'll never forget that race. What stands out in my mind was the difference in the enthusiasm between the two campaigns.

History

The two campaigns held rallies less than one week apart at the same location--Rhode Island College. One would think, given the fact that we all know Hillary won the primary handily, that she would have had a larger contingent of supporters at her rally. That however, couldn't have been further from the truth 

Obama had an overflow crowd, with people forced to stand outside and listen on loud speakers. Clinton, on the other hand, could barely fill up half of the field house. 

The lesson that I gleaned from covering the astonishing turn of events was that what matters most in elections is having more supporters--not the more enthusiastic supporters. Ideally, it would be nice to have both. But if a candidate had to pick one, they'd be better off ten times out of ten with more, albeit less passionate, supporters.

Lesson Learned

Yet despite the popularity of Sanders with the state's progressives, it's hard to believe that the Senator from Vermont will be able to piece together enough votes to overcome the Clinton juggernaut. 

I believe that same type of scenario as 2008 will play out again in this year's election. I don't think I'm going out on a limb by suggesting that the Sanders supporters are more enthusiastic. That's obvious on social media and elsewhere.

Yet as 2008 showed us, just because a candidate has the more enthusiastic supporters doesn't mean he will win. 

Flawed Analysis?

None of this is to say the only reason that I believe Clinton will prevail tomorrow is solely based on history. As the old saying goes: last week's points don't win this week's games.

Yet the rationale being used by some pundits to predict victory is, in my humble opinion, based on flawed rationale. For instance, Alan I. Abramowitz, a columnist and number cruncher for Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball, from the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, gives Sanders the edge because the state has a relatively low number of African American voters and, what's more, a larger number of independents taking part in the primary. 

But are the the vast majority of the people in Rhode Island who affiliate as "unaffiliated", which is commonly referred to as independent, really independent? I think not. 

Not so "independent"

If Rhode Island's "independent voters" were really so undecided, it would stand to reason that the state would elect Republicans--at least now and again. Yet the state hasn't had a Republican statewide office holder since Don Carcieri left office. And Democrats have dominated the General Assembly for about 80 years. 

Given that fact, I consider most of Rhode Island's independent voters to be Democrats. That suggests that the voter models that give Sanders an edge due to the high presence of Democrats totally flawed. 

In the end, if Clinton prevails it will be due to her unparalleled level of experience and the electorate's familiarity with her. Further, Rhode Island is a highly unionized state, and Clinton has the support of most unions, at least on the national level. (Clinton also has the support of the state's Democratic establishment, but that means nothing at best, and could be a liability in a year like this.)

Trump to win "Yuge"

Admittedly, it does remain a wild card whether or not the Clinton camp can turn out voters in the state's urban core to high enough levels to seal the victory, while maintaining her traditional support levels in places like Johnston, Cranston, and Warwick. I believe Clinton will.

On the Republican side, Trump will win and win big. So there's no drama there. 

Fortunately, we have a hotly contested Democratic Primary to keep us in suspense. 

View Larger +

Russell Moore has worked on both sides of the desk in Rhode Island media, both for newspapers and on political campaigns. Send him email at [email protected]. Follow him on twitter @russmoore713. 

 

Related Slideshow: 10 Ways Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump Are Actually Similar

View Larger +
Prev Next

Universal Health Care 

Despite sitting on opposite sides of the aisle, Trump and Sanders essentially share the same healthcare plan. But you don’t have to take our word for it—Ted Cruz, Trump’s chief rival, said himself that Trump and Sanders “have basically the same healthcare plan," in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

"Donald Trump enthusiastically supported the TARP bailout of big banks. I opposed it. He enthusiastically supported Barack Obama's stimulus plan. He thought it should have been bigger. I think it was a disaster and a waste of money. Actually, Donald not only supported both of those, but he argued that Obamacare should be expanded to make it socialized medicine for everyone,” Cruz told Hannity

View Larger +
Prev Next

Reforming Wall Street

Both candidates have made serious noise talking about reforming Wall Street. Bernie Sanders has just about made his whole career on taking on financial kingpins, and has attracted many young fans in the process.

While the uber-capitalist Trump may seem like the candidate to take on his fellow one-percenters, his words say something different. Trump blasted hedge fund managers on CBS, saying they are “getting away with murder,” on CBS’ “Face the Nation" in 2015.

"The hedge fund guys didn't build this country. These are guys that shift paper around and they get lucky,” Trump said.

View Larger +
Prev Next

They Don't Take Money from Wall Street

It’s not just that the candidates criticize Wall Street and big banks—plenty do that. But Trump and Sanders back up their tough talk by not attracting campaign donations from those same financial institutions.

Sure, Hillary Clinton has taken aim at the major financial mavericks during her time on the campaign trail—what self-respecting Democrat hasn’t? But a closer look at her campaign financials shows that she isn’t putting her money where her mouth is.

View Larger +
Prev Next

Their Campaigns are Populist Movements

Neither Trump nor Sanders are what you would call a “party darling.” Both have taken aim at the lions and leaders of their own parties have been unafraid to make controversial statements regarding the political establishments.

Instead, their campaigns have been buoyed by passionate, typically politically apathetic people. People who have finally found someone they  can relate to in the political landscape and someone they feel they can trust. Despite repeated predictions of failure, regular people continue to respond to their campaigns, as both Sanders and Trump remain near or at the polls as the primaries begin.

View Larger +
Prev Next

The Most Unusual Candidates (Ever?)

Trump and Sanders are certainly the most unusual candidates this year, as both the Republican and Democratic fields contain typical governors, senators and congressman vying for the ultimate government job. It goes one step further, however—they may be the most unusual candidates a Presidential campaign has ever seen.

Sure, Trump isn’t the first rich eccentric to take a run at the Oval Office (just google Ross Perot if you don’t believe us.) But he’s certainly the first candidate to speak about immigrants and other races as he has.

View Larger +
Prev Next

Massive Crowds

Political candidates of any variety like going where they are wanted. They make sure that there are plenty of warm well-wishers to make campaign events see exciting and full.

Trump and Sanders, however, seem to be able to attract raucous crowds that are more akin to rock concert or playoff game than a political rally. People come in costume, dressed as their favorite candidate. Teenagers, even though they cannot cast a vote, turn out in full face paint to support their candidate.

It’s happened all over the country. Record-setting crowds packed the Moda Center in Portland, Oregon and thousands filled the DCU Center to see Trump in Worcester, Massachusetts. Everywhere these candidates go, people rush to see them.

View Larger +
Prev Next

Lots of Small-Money Donations

Typically, leading Presidential campaigns are powered by big money donations, but that’s not the case for Trump and Sanders.

As Graphiq shows us below, Sanders and Trump are one and two, respectively in the amount of campaign donations under $200—a sure sign of grassroots support.

View Larger +
Prev Next

Real Talk

How often do you watch and listen to a political speaking, and find yourself drifting off to sleep or reaching for your iPhone?

That rarely seems to be the case when Trump or Sanders are on the mic. You never quite know when Trump will insult an entire religion or ethnic group in one thirty-second soundbite. 

Not to be outdone, Sanders folksy and frantic style of speech has attracted attention—and plenty of jokes and memes—from all across the internet.

View Larger +
Prev Next

 Slated for Failure

Since the first day that each candidate announced their campaign, the political intellectual and elite have told everyone that they just don’t stand a chance. Trump and Sanders are too controversial, their too radical and they are too inexperienced. How many times did political analysts or other talking heads say they would be out of the race before the first votes are ever cast?

Yet here we are, just a few days away from the first caucuses and primaries. Neither Trump nor Sanders are out of the race. Neither is on their dying breaths. They are thriving. And, as you’ll see in our next slide, they are winning

View Larger +
Prev Next

Leading in Iowa (and New Hampshire!)

If the latest polls are to believed these massively unusual candidates—one socialist, one real estate magnate/reality tv star, both with tons of small donations, both told they never had any chance—will be making victory speeches in Iowa and New Hampshire soon.

According to CNN, Trump has an 11 point lead among Republicans and Sanders an eight point lead among Democrats in Iowa just a few days before the caucus.

And in New Hampshire, as you’ll see below,  Trump and Sanders have double digit leads as we approach the first true primary.

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook