Moore: GE Decision Shows RI Must Be Business Friendly

Monday, January 18, 2016

 

View Larger +

Outside of the fan boys and fan girls in the Rhode Island media and government, it was really not much of a surprise to anyone that General Electric chose to move its corporate headquarters, and the 800 good paying jobs that come with it, to Boston instead of 'good ole Little Rhody.'

In the end, the truth is that GE was never seriously considering a relocation to Rhode Island, despite the diplomatic rhetoric from the company's leadership. (New York was probably a more realistic option, and stronger competition to the lure the Connecticut based Fortune 10 company.)

When you get down to brass tacks, the City of Boston was just a more attractive option judging by almost every metric.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Boston’s Advantages

Boston could offer a better incentive package than Rhode Island. The Boston Globe reports that the state of Massachusetts offered an incentive package worth $120 million. It's astonishing to think that the state taxpayers of Massachusetts could lure one of the most successful companies in the world with just $120 million when Rhode Island loaned 38 Studios $75 million and was considering giving the Pawtucket Red Sox, whose primary economic development is people pouring beers and selling peanuts, over $100 million. 

These facts suggest that Rhode Island still doesn't have its priorities straight. Further, Massachusetts was named the most innovative state in the country according to a recent article in Bloomberg Business. The achievement was mostly due to Boston's Route 128 and its biotech industry. That, combined with the fact that the non-profit Tax Foundation, ranked Massachusetts the 25th most business friendly state in the nation almost assuredly weighed heavily on GE's decision to relocate there.

Rhode Island’s Weaknesses

Surprisingly, Rhode Island also scored well in the survey, ranking in as the 14th best state in the nation for innovation. Despite the high ranking, we can still do better and build upon what is undoubtedly one of our strengths. It doesn't help that the City of Providence is constantly harassing the strong universities and colleges the city does boast of for more tax revenue in the form of "payments in lieu of taxes". Sure, the colleges should be paying their fair share, but as the GE move to Boston highlights, colleges and universities do a lot for the local economy. The relationships between our capital city (and state) and colleges needs to be symbiotic--not adversarial. 

What Rhode Island does have is an adversarial relationship with the business community. The state of Rhode Island, according to the nonprofit Tax Foundation, has the 45th worst business tax climate in the nation.  That's not exactly enticing for a business to relocate into Rhode Island, despite the different tweaks and changes the state has put in place over the years. Massachusetts, on the other hand, ranked as the 24th best business tax climate in the nation, which admittedly isn't great, but it's not terrible either. Score one more for The Bay State.

New Anti-Business Measures

What's most disconcerting is the fact that our state leaders don't seem to understand that Rhode Island needs more than rhetoric to entice businesses to relocate and expand here. Both Governor Gina Raimondo and House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello are tremendous at paying lip service to their interest in improving the state's economy, their actions, at least at times, say others.

For instance, does a brand new tax on vacation rental homes suggest a pro-business attitude or an anti-business mindset? Does a new tax on health insurance suggest our state leaders are concerned about improving the economy? And does the creation of new toll gantries across the state imply that Raimondo and Mattiello are pro-business, or people who don't mind making it harder here for truckers to survive? All of those questions are obviously rhetorical. But it's important that Rhode Islanders don't get hypnotized by their increasingly Orwellian pro-business (empty) rhetoric.

Foster Innovation

None of Governor Raimondo's anti-business decisions would have necessarily been a deal breaker for the company to locate here. But they certainly don't move the proverbial football up the field. Let's face it: they're demerits to the state's economy. 

Governor Raimondo is correct to assert that we need to foster an innovation economy. The way to do that however, is not with new toll booths or taxes on health insurance. The way to achieve that end is to cut taxes and remove regulations. And yes, here's the ugly truth: in order to cut taxes, we'll need to cut spending. There's no other way around it. And that may upset special interest groups. But big feats require fortitude--something we're in short supply of in The Ocean State. 

That may not be enough to land the next GE, but it certainly won't hurt. And I guarantee the state would see more economic development from other companies relocating here, or expanding. In other words, we'd be moving in the right direction. 

View Larger +

Russell J. Moore has worked on both sides of the desk in Rhode Island media, both for newspapers and on political campaigns. Send him email at [email protected]. Follow him on twitter @russmoore713. 

 

Related Slideshow: Leaders on Fixing RI’s Economy

Recent rankings put Rhode Island #37 for business climate.  And while that takes the state out of its most bottom-dwelling days, leaders across RI have weighed in as to what could futher the state moving forward. 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Leadership Issues

Dr. Edward Mazze, URI Distinguished Professor of Business

"Knowing who is in charge when it comes to setting policy, making things happen and being able to mobilize resources to support policy. Economic development in Rhode Island is fragmented, cities competing against cities, cities competing against the state, the executive branch competing against the legislature. There is no "one state" economic development focus. The Governor has to be in charge in charge of setting policy, and have the resources to accomplish her objectives.

ECONOMIC GAME CHANGER: Line item veto so the Governor can make things happen."

View Larger +
Prev Next

State Taxes

Dr. Edward Mazze, URI Distinguished Professor of Business

"State taxes (business and personal income, sales, estate) and local taxes (property) impact every decision a business makes.  High taxes exist in Rhode Island because the state is divided into so many cities and towns needing funds to support their activities. The state needs to look at different ways to reorganize local government structure.  Without a new structure, state and local governments will continue to have increasing deficits which will require increasing taxes.

ECONOMIC GAME CHANGER: Government-Business Task Force under the leadership of the Lieutenant Governor to recommend a structure best suited to provide the services required by Rhode Island taxpayers in a more economic and efficient manner."

View Larger +
Prev Next

Recruiting

Dr. Edward Mazze, URI Distinguished Professor of Business

"The best recruiters for economic development are the business community. Chambers, professional groups and educational institutions play a role an important role in this activity but it is nowhere as important as the role played by individual business people/leaders. Many of Rhode Island's largest businesses are "owned" and/or "headquartered" in other states or countries.

ECONOMIC GAME CHANGER: Getting business people "invested" in economic development and letting the private sector do their thing."

View Larger +
Prev Next

Support vs. Stars

Dr. Edward Mazze, URI Distinguished Professor of Business

"Reaching for the giant business "stars" and not taking advantage of the state's strategic assets, namely, the small business community. The state's strategic location and assets provides a competitive advantage to marine industries, the hospitality industry, exporting and importing, health and education and professional services- many of these industries  are made up of small/medium sized businesses. 

ECONOMIC GAME CHANGER: Providing the support ( tax credits, less burdensome regulations, a better tax structure) for small businesses to survive and grow. Small businesses are the Main Street businesses in Rhode Island and create jobs."

View Larger +
Prev Next

Multi-Faceted Approach

Gary Sasse, Founding Director of the Hassenfeld Institute for Leadership at Bryant University and Former Director of Administration 

"The centerpiece of an economic development strategy is the productivity with which a state uses its human and capital resources. Only businesses can create jobs and economic growth. Therefore, states compete to offer the most productive climate for the private sector to succeed.

There is no silver bullet. Making Rhode Island economic competitive requires a five-part strategy encompassing workforce development, urban education reform,  tax competitiveness, targeted recruitment and retention and technology commercialization with an emphasis on middle class jobs and small business."

View Larger +
Prev Next

195 Incentives

Laurie White, President, Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce

"I would...add that the $25 million incentive pool to maximize a game changing investment on the 195 lands is critically important for many reasons including sending a signal that RI's period of unilateral disarmament is over."

View Larger +
Prev Next

Game Changes Needed

Larry Girouard, RI Taxpayers

"There is not one game changer that will begin to drive the RI brand up the competitive ladder ... Rhode Island will need a series of “game changes” if the business community is to take notice.  

*Line Item Veto for the Governor ... 44 states have this.  The Line Item Veto will provide some checks and balances regarding leadership spending.

* Put real teeth in the ethics commission ... need I say more

* Develop a more stringent approach to bills where, in the short term (1-2 years) the focus will be on only those bills that have an impact on the RI competitive brand.  Each bill should have an economic impact statement associated with it to justify the legislature spending its valuable time on it.

* All bonds over $50,000 must be approved by the voters.

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook