Michael Riley: The Pension Study Commission Needs To Face Reality
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
For many taxpayers in Rhode Island, the $609 per household is relatively insignificant. Compare that $609 to the predicament of Providence citizens, for example, who face an increase of over $8,229 per household in the next year in pension liability alone. This is real and will be evident once Moody’s adjusts Mayor Taveras fantasy numbers to reality. Even Providence‘s city-hired auditor points out that $57.3 million in inappropriate assets were claimed in the pension plan. The actuary points this out in Section 1, points 2 and 3 … “We recommend future valuation of plan assets exclude discounted contributions from reported assets. “ Ouch.
Whoops, the auditor just said planned assets were overstated by $57.3 million. No one in the mainstream media apparently reads these reports or does real analysis. Where was Politifact? Taveras hopes and expects the rest of the RI media to just ignore this adjustment, as well as the pending proper liability adjustment of an increased $506 million and total unfunded liability of $1.338 billion (which will be published and verified after this November 2014 elections). He obviously intends to mislead citizens until the inevitable reality hits.
In hot water
There are basically two RI government jurisdictions providing public sector employment. Citizens are taxed at both the state level and at the local level to pay the wages and benefits of public employees. Several towns have merged their local pension plans into the state system and so on Friday, it appears that the hike in liability to those taxpayers in merged towns will be constrained to the agreed upon cost.
However, many cities and towns still run their own local Defined Benefit Pension Plans and those taxpayers are vulnerable to much higher liability. The 17 “critical status” towns alone owe more than $2.2 billion in pension debt. In addition, nearly every city and town carries an OPEB liability, which is basically the unfunded liability due to health care benefits and other benefits. Town leaders bargained future health care coverage for public employees, yet never funded the obligation. These OPEB liabilities totaled $3.56 billion according to a report issued by the RI State Auditor General Dennis Hoyle (a pension commission member).
State settlement insignificant relative to local debt issues
Several other towns in Rhode Island have the same issue as Providence (while not of the same magnitude). They are large and the increases in liability that will appear due to more accurate accounting will dwarf the cost per household of this highly hyped state settlement. Comparatively, the state settlement is literally a drop in the bucket. I have not yet heard a plan for the cities and towns from the gubernatorial candidates. So far, of all the candidates, Mayor Fung seems most concerned about the local issue and has criticized the lack of focus for years now. Ms. Raimondo dropped the city and town fixes in her legislative effort because it was too hard to address.
So what are Providence, Pawtucket, West Warwick, Coventry, Cranston, etc. supposed to do? Are they on their own? Is the Pension Study Commission, now years old, supposed to do anything other than collect data? Does anyone think that the taxpayers in Central Coventry Fire District care more about the $609, or the $30,000+ per household the recent CCFD liquidation reportedly represents?
A looming $30,000 liability will crush local real estate prices, producing a downward spiral in assessment and tax collection. This dynamic is known as the “Detroit syndrome”. Citizens should try to avoid being trapped in this spiral at all costs, but this contagion is just around the corner, and Moody’s will judge all towns more harshly. It begins soon by lowering the discount rates, which are arbitrarily chosen by each town (Providence’s is 8.25%) to a standard 6% so we can compare towns across the United States. Additionally, Moody's has declared that they are doubling the weighing of pension and OPEB under-funding in municipal rating decisions. If a local pension fund is deeply underfunded, then those towns can expect an even lower discount rate—perhaps as low as 4%. Rhode Island stands out like a sore thumb compared to all other localities across the country in the number of local pension plans under 50% funded.
In short, we have a real crisis that may not have 14 more months of “analysis and negotiation“ before this situation spins completely out of control. Which leaders will address this? When can we get a “real” pension commission? Has Chafee now finished and will he defend his 38 Studios actions for the rest of the term, or can he actually pitch in and work to help this crisis? Why doesn’t he involve himself in Coventry, or West Warwick? How about a commission that at least standardizes discount rates and adheres to rating agencies’ reality? Are they really saying Providence is fine at $8.25%? Is it too much to ask for a single metric? All we ask is that the commission tell us the truth and their plans to fix it.
Related Slideshow: New England Communities With the Most Political Clout 2013
The Sunlight Foundation, in conjunction with Azavea, released data maps this week showing political contribution dollars to federal elections dating back to 1990 -- by county.
GoLocal takes a look at the counties in New England that had the highest per-capita contributions in the 2012 election cycle -- and talked with experts about what that meant for those areas in New Engand, as well as the candidates.
24. Cheshire County, NH
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $9.88
Total contributions: $759,209
Cheshire is one of the five original counties in New Hampshire and was founded in 1771. The highest point in Cheshire County is located at the top of Mount Monadnock, which was made famous by the poets Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau.
21. Hampshire County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $10.41
Total contributions: $1,664,077
Hampshire County has a total area of 545 square miles and is located in the middle of Massachusetts. Hampshire County is also the only county to be surrounded in all directions by other Massachusetts counties.
20. Barnstable County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $10.90
Total contributions: $2,348,541
Barnstable County was founded in 1685 and has three national protected areas. Cape Cod National Seashore is the most famous protected area within Barnstable County and brings in a high amount of tourists every year.
19. Berkshire County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $12.49
Total contributions: $1,624,400
Berkshire County is located on the western side of Massachusetts and borders three different neighboring states. Originally the Mahican Native American Tribe inhabited Berkshire County up until the English settlers arrived and bought the land in 1724.
18. Essex County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $13.22
Total contributions: $9,991,201
Essex is located in the northeastern part of Massachusetts and contains towns such as Salem, Lynn, and Andover. Essex was founded in 1643 and because of Essex historical background, the whole county has been designated as the Essex National Heritage Area.
15. Addison County, VT
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $15.49
Total contributions: $569,299
Located on the west side of Vermont, Addison County has a total area of 808 square miles. Addison's largest town is Middlebury, where the Community College of Vermont and Middlebury College are located.
11. Bristol County, RI
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $20.91
Total contributions: $1,027,472
Bristol County has a population of 49,144 and is the third smallest county in the United States. Bristol County was originally apart of Massachusetts, but was transferred to Rhode Island in 1746.
10. Grafton County, NH
Contributions, per capita, 2012 :$20.95
Total contributions: $1,868,739
With a population of 89,181, Grafton County is the second largest county in New Hampshire. Home of New Hampshire’s only national forest, White Mountain National Forest takes up about half of Grafton’s total area
7. Middlesex County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $32.81
Total contributions: $50,432,154
Middlesex County has a population of 1,503,085 and has been ranked as the most populous county in New England. The county government was abolished in 1997, but the county boundaries still exists for court jurisdictions and other administrative purposes.
6. Nantucket County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $33.41
Total contributions: $344,021
Nantucket County consists of a couple of small islands and is a major tourist destination in Massachusetts. Normally Nantucket has a population of 10,298, but during the summer months the population can reach up to 50,000.
4. Dukes County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $36.32
Total contributions: $618,960
Consisting of Martha’s Vineyard and the Elizabeth Islands, Dukes County is one of Massachusetts’ top vacation spots. Originally Dukes County was apart New York, however it was transferred to Massachusetts on October 7, 1691.
3. Suffolk County, MA
Contributions, per capita, 2012: $40.73
Total contributions: $30,323,537
Suffolk County has a population of 744,426 and contains Massachusetts’s largest city, Boston. Although Suffolk’s county government was abolished in the late 1900’s, it still remains as a geographic area.
- Michael Riley: Analysing A Crisis
- Michael Riley: Is the RI Pension Commission Making Up Numbers?
- Michael Riley: The Municipal Pension Study Commission Is A Failure
- Michael Riley: West Warwick Is Headed For Disaster
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Michael Riley: Rhode Island’s Leadership Problem
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Mike Riley: Rhode Island is More Conservative than You Think
- Guest MINDSETTER™ Mike Riley: Right-to-Work is Right for Rhode Island
- PowerPlayer: Republican Congressional Candidate Michael Riley