| | Advanced Search


NEW: Hull Criticizes Smiley Withdrawal—Rhode Island State Representative Ray Hull has criticized…

NEW: Fung Opposes Chafee Administration Pay Hikes—Republican candidate for Governor Allan Fung testified against…

Friday Financial Five - August 22, 2014—Little bundles of joy are considered priceless, but…

Jackson Browne Digs Deep at PPAC—Jackson Browne arrived in town with a grand…

5 Live Music Musts - August 22, 2014—Here at “5 Live,” we absolutely refuse to…

Moms Can-Do’s: Kamp Kid Adventures LEGO Engineering and More!—Moms of little ones—from toddlers to elementary schoolers—looking…

Tax Breaks for Developers - See the Special Deals—See the special deals and millions in tax…

Hodgson Names Gobeil as Campaign Manager—Republican candidate for Attorney General Dawson Hodgson has…

Block Calls on Fung to Explain His Role in Cranston Police Scandals—Republican candidate for Governor Ken Block has called…

Progressive Democrats Of Rhode Island Endorse Clay Pell for Governor—The Rhode Island Progressive Democrats of America (RIPDA)have…


John Perilli: Smith Hill’s Strongest Lobby, Unmasked

Wednesday, January 22, 2014


The NRA and their various affiliates do a lousy job representing gun owners, believes John Perilli.

Quick. What is one of the most influential interest groups among Rhode Island's Democratic leadership?

It has given hundreds of dollars to the likes to Speaker Gordon Fox, House Majority Leader Nick Mattiello, Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed and Senate Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio. In one of the bluest states in the country, it calls its legislative shots with incredible accuracy, and rarely allows a law it opposes to be passed.

Would you believe that it's the National Rifle Association?

The Ocean State is an unlikely stronghold for America's most powerful gun lobby. The NRA's Political Victory Fund has given more than $146,000 to Rhode Island state-level candidates since 2002, including all three Speakers of the House who have served in those years. In fact, former speaker William J. Murphy is one of the gun lobby's loudest voices on Smith Hill. Gun rallies at the State House are some of the largest you will ever see. This past Sunday, hundreds of gun owners gathered on the steps of the State House in spite of bitterly cold conditions.

There aren't many interest groups in Rhode Island who boast this kind of influence.

However, with power comes complacency. During the NRA's reign as one of America's most powerful interest groups, they have also been one of the worst. They have done an awful job representing the interests of their members, and are wracked with corruption besides.

And this week, as if to cap off the corrupt trend, they agreed to pay a $63,000 fine to the RI Board of Elections for violating campaign finance laws. They have not only failed their members, but just about everyone else as well.

A Lesson in Bad Leadership

Gun ownership and gun rights are deeply emotional issues. For this reason, I will first lay down some ground rules:

No, I will not argue that gun control either does or does not ultimately work.

No, I will not pass judgment on anyone who is a rank-and-file member of the NRA, or has taken NRA money.

But I will take the NRA's political leadership to task. I cannot think of a group of industry insiders who do a worse job of representing gun owners as a group.

Consider the tragic event that brought the issue of gun rights back into the public debate in 2012: the massacre at Sandy Hook. In the dark days afterward, the NRA seemed to go into a contemplative silence, and the world wondered how they would respond. Polls showed that 74 percent of NRA members (!) supported requiring criminal background checks to anyone buying a gun, so this seemed a feasible middle ground proposal for the group to support. Would the NRA take this path?

Not a chance.

The NRA instead came out in support of placing armed guards in schools. It was almost as if they had a vested interest in selling guns. Hang on…

Pete Brownell, CEO of Brownells, one of America's largest supplier of firearms parts? NRA Board Member. Ronnie Barrett, CEO of Barrett Firearms? NRA Board Member. George Kollitides, CEO of the company that manufactures the AR-15? NRA Trustee.

The turnout of eligible voting members for the latest NRA board elections? 7.2 percent.

The moral issues of this aside, your average gun owner is not the president of a multimillion dollar firearms company. How then does the NRA accurately represent its members?

Political Science has a concept called the Iron Law of Oligarchy, which says that an interest group will inherently fight for its own survival rather than the interests of its members. The NRA is such an absurdly perfect example of this rule that it is scary.

And it's not just at the national level.

Guns and the Ocean State

Pro-gun rallies at the State House are a sight to behold. They regularly draw hundreds of dedicated, well-meaning, law-abiding gun owners, all chanting in support of the Second Amendment. As I mentioned, there was a massive one this past Sunday, and there are sure to be more as the year goes on.

The NRA does all it can to use this popular support to their advantage on Smith Hill. This past state legislative session, even after noted NRA donation recipients Speaker Gordon Fox and Attorney General Peter Kilmartin proposed gun reforms, almost no serious firearm laws were passed. The bills defeated included everything from a ban on semiautomatic weapons to a relief board for people who feel they have been wronged by the background check system. Given Rhode Island's political makeup, this is a disproportionate amount of success for the NRA.

However, cracks in the NRA's Ocean State presence are starting to show.

Last September, Sam Bell, the Rhode Island state coordinator of the Progressive Democrats of America, smelled a rat in the NRA's campaign finance disclosures. He lodged an official complaint with the Board of Elections, claiming that the NRA's national fund was violating campaign finance law by donating to the organization's Rhode Island PAC. The NRA Rhode Island PAC promptly dissolved, and this week the organization finally agreed to a $63,000 fine from the BOE.

Even considering everything else the NRA has done, this crosses the line. How does this represent the interests of gun owners? It certainly isn't law-abiding.

And how can the NRA explain the results of December's recall elections in Exeter? How could it be that one of the most conservative districts in the state couldn't force a recall in what was basically a proxy battle over gun rights? The NRA took no official stand in Exeter, and the gun reformers prevailed.

Represent that!

Until the NRA makes a serious effort to become more representative of gun owners in general, it will be nothing more than an organ of the gun manufacturers whose sole interest is to sell firearms. And until this change is made, they will continue to disrupt our venerable democratic process more than any other interest group in America.


John Perilli is a native of Cumberland, RI and a junior at Brown University. He is the Communications Director for the Brown University Democrats. The opinions presented in this article do not necessarily represent those of the organizations of which John Perilli is a member.


Related Slideshow: Cranston Police Contributions to Allan Fung

Prev Next

Lt. Stephen Antonucci

12 contributions from Vito Antonucci, City of Providence, Public Properties Division, Chepachet RI. Made from 2008-13 total of $825.

  • 6/16/08 $100
  • 7/28/08 $150
  • 7/28/08 $150
  • 8/22/08 $50
  • 8/22/08 $50
  • 9/20/08 $100
  • 9/20/08 $100
  • 3/07/09 $100
  • 5/18/09 $100
  • 9/13/11 $100
  • 9/29/13 $100


8 Contributions from Michelle Antonucci, 60 Pine Ridge Drive, Cranston (PayChex Inc. of EP as employer).  Made from 2008-2013 for $1,060.

  • 6/19/08 $100
  • 8/06/08 $150
  • 8/06/08 $150
  • 9/23/08 $50
  • 9/23/08 $50
  • 4/16/09 $200
  • 10/26/10 $60
  • 10/03/13 $500


2 Contributions from Gail Antonucci, 119 Woodview Drive, Cranston (Homemaker)

  • 6/18/08 $100
  • 5/18/09 $100


contributions from Kevin Antonucci, 70 Garden Hills Drive, Cranston (City of Cranston)

  • 7/28/08 $150
  • 7/28/08 $150
Prev Next

Lt. Alan Loiselle

9 Contributions in name of Alan Loiselle, 20 Eastgate Drive, Warwick (City of Cranston as employer)

  • 6/5/08 $186.83 (In-kind, listed as “Hardware and supplies for headquarters”)
  • 6/16/08 $200
  • 6/23/08 $53.37 (In-kind, see above)
  • 7/28/08 $150
  • 7/31/08 $133.36 (In-kind, “Building materials and supplies”)
  • 5/18/09 $100
  • 9/16/08 $127.12 (In-kind, “Building equipment and supplies”)
  • 8/30/10 $100
  • 10/24/10 $50


1 Contribution from Robert Loiselle, Loiselle Insurance Agency, Pawtucket.

  • 10/29/08 $100


1 Contribution from Martin Loiselle, retired, 180 Potters Ave., Cranston.

  • 6/16/08 $100
Prev Next

Lt. Carl R. Ricci

7 contributions from a Carl R. Ricci, 76 Northview Ave. Cranston (Phred’s Drugs as employer)

  • 8/20/09 $300
  • 8/30/10 $100
  • 10/30/09 $125
  • 2/25/10 $150
  • 2/23/11 $150
  • 2/21/12 $150
  • 2/21/13 $150


Prev Next

Captain Sean Carmody

2 contributions from Sean P. Carmody, 129 Allens Ave. Cranston (City of Cranston employer)

  • 9/21/08 $100
  • 10/08/08 $200

10 contributions from Melissa Augaitis, 10 Basil Crossing, (Employer, Perspectives Corporation)

  • 6/16/08 $200
  • 3/26/09 $100
    2/25/10 $300
    8/30/10 $250
    10/17/10 $200
    2/23/11 $200
    2/29/12 $150
    6/3/13 $250
    6/25/13 $250
    9/29/12 $500

1 contribution from Maureen Carmody, same address, no employer

  • 7/28/08 $100


Prev Next

Chief Marco Palombo

4 Contributions in name of Michelle Palombo, 4 Jennifer Circle, Cranston (homemaker)

  • 9/18/08 $50
  • 9/13/11 $150
  • 6/25/13 $200
  • 7/22/13 $200

Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Not a member of the NRA, not a gun owner, but this is a union state. That's the most powerful political lobbying force. Don't mistake recent awakenings by public officials that we need systematic change to mislead you. Math is math, and eventually your broke when spending exceeds revenue.

The 2nd amendment is a pretty powerful advocate for gun ownership. Most people believe in the constitution, despite its rigidity and age. We need to have common sense laws on gun ownership ( I think we can do better) but Americans gained our independence bathed in the blood of patriots and tyranny. We must never forget that. Despite the over reach of the NRA.

Comment #1 by Redd Ratt on 2014 01 22

Simply proves the point that party affiliation really doesn't mean a hill of beans. It's all about the Benjamins.
Whether is the NEA (National Education Association) or the NRA they are all equal opportunity givers in a General Assembly full of equal opportunity takers.

Comment #2 by Walter Miller on 2014 01 22

As we all know, the Second Amendment requires that every person, no matter how stupid, emotionally ill-equipped, or mentally unstable, have unlimited access to firearms on demand.

The proliferation of guns in this country presents a real danger to the 75% or so of us who do NOT own guns and would like to NOT get killed by one.
I think that it is not unreasonable to require mandatory liability insurance for gun ownership. If I have to have liability insurance for a car or truck, why should anyone escape responsibility for any injury or death caused by their guns? Insurance guarantees that there will be money to pay for damages

Comment #3 by Sammy Arizona on 2014 01 22

Dear Mr. Arizona,

In you progressive thinking straight jacket you make the mistake of saying that "...the Second Amendment requires that every person,...". Progressives mandate and require - the Second Amendment does not require anything.

And it may be trite but true - GUNS do not kill. The people most likely to kill using a gun are the people who you should sell liability insurance to. Good luck.

Comment #4 by Michael Byrnes on 2014 01 23

It's interesting that Obozocare is "settled law" (in the eyes of the left anyway) but the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is a target for marsupial jurists egged on by those wo would disarm us.

Comment #5 by G Godot on 2014 01 23

It's also interesting to note that the "opinion makers" at Camp Bruno, so accomplished at shouting down those with whom they disagree, think that trying they can attack the NRA with impunity.

Comment #6 by G Godot on 2014 01 23

Pimps and whores need each other.

Comment #7 by John Onamas on 2014 01 26


Incisive. Don't forget the Johns

Comment #8 by Michael Byrnes on 2014 01 26

There is never a middle ground, there is no compromise when you are asking one side to give something up and the other gives up nothing.

The fact is gun controllers have nothing to offer gun owners. Gun owners are asked to give up rights and freedoms.
Something everyone tends to forget, the Bill of Rights doesn't grant Rights it recognizes them and restricts the Government from restricting those Rights.

History shows us small arms control starts with registration, banning and confiscation. Every time, including in this country.

Everyone brings up the Second, how about the Fourth? Being secure in your persons, houses, papers and effects.
How about RI's Constitution Article I, Section 22 "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." That's it, the whole thing no mention of Militia straight forward black and white.

You want to stop the violence? Get respect back in society. Keep violent offenders in prison. How many times do we have to see those that commit murder have a history on violence? Put personal responsibility back in place. Blame the crimes on the criminal not the tool.

We could stop speeding violations if we ban fast cars. Why would you need to go more than 65 mph anyway?

Comment #9 by Wuggly Ump on 2014 01 28

I'm sorry, but your theory on the Bill of Rights is incorrect. The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. The term "amendment" is important, since it refers to an alteration of the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was not part of the Constitution, but was approved almost a year after the Constitution. Approval by 3/4 of the states was required. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to help alleviate the fears of some states over federal power.

The amendments in the Bill of Rights, and all amendments, are by themselves neither rights nor laws. They are principles that must be enacted and defined by laws. For instance, the Volstead act was passed by Congress to enact the 18th amendment by setting up agencies and procedures to control the distribution of liquor. To use one of your examples, the Fourth Amendment is enacted and limited by a series of laws, procedures, and court rulings that define probable cause and situations that require warrants. The same is true for all amendments. Why should the Second Amendment be any different. In fact, this principle in contained in the amendment with the words "well regulated."

There is no right in this country that is unlimited. The limits are usually defined by the point where they interfere with the rights of other people, such as yelling "fire" in a crowded theater. Oliver Wendell Holmes maybe said it best, "The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins."

Comment #10 by John Onamas on 2014 01 28

Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.