Jill Davidson: Students Need Meaningful Learning Experiences
Friday, March 08, 2013
Jill Davidson says the arguments surrounding NECAP test scores aren't about low vs. high expectations.
Pointing out that a single test score cannot measure the value of an education is not “affirming mediocrity,” as Ms. Steiny accuses advocates—and the general public—of doing. Arguing that creating a culture of high expectations requires a great deal more than slapping an irrelevant high-stakes test onto the end of a student’s 12-year school career is not affirming mediocrity (the test is irrelevant because the NECAP’s developers have warned that the test “should not be used … for making promotion and/or graduation decisions”). Asking how cramming for an arbitrary improvement on an arbitrary math test will somehow make students more college-ready is not affirming mediocrity; indeed, such cramming should not, as Ms. Steiny suggests, represent students’ commitment to “ramp up their game.” And declaring that a whole generation of students whose schools have failed them from a young age should not be used as cannon fodder to further a particular education reform agenda is not affirming mediocrity.
That is why a wide variety of organizations—including the Children’s Policy Coalition, the Urban League, the ACLU, Young Voices, and the RI Disability Law Center—support legislation to halt the state’s disastrous plan, which puts 40 percent of the state’s public school juniors at risk of not graduating. Still, Ms. Steiny can’t understand why anybody would oppose this requirement since, after all, “life is a test.” Indeed it is, and we wish for young people to be well-prepared for life by participating in meaningful learning experiences, not by jumping through hoops.
Along with the many others who stand opposed to using the NECAP as a graduation gatekeeper, I am all for high expectations for every young person in this state. I look forward to working with Ms. Steiny and others on identifying and implementing measures of academic and personal achievement that represent the high standards we have for our young people--and to ensuring that they have the schools and communities that will get them there.
On March 16, the Providence Student Union will offer a shortened version of the NECAP to a diverse group of elected officials and community leaders. Before Ms. Steiny and others opposed to this legislation condemn a significant number of students to the unemployment and welfare lines, we have one simple request: take the test yourself. After all, if the NECAP is, in fact, such an effective measure of success that its score alone can determine a student’s qualification for a diploma, all of us who have experienced career and personal success as adults should be able to pass it as well.
Jill Davidson is a parent of three Providence public school students, a member of the Providence Public Schools Parent Advisory Committee, and Director of Publications and Communications, Educators for Social Responsibility
Related Articles
- Julia Steiny: Rhode Island, Raise Your Rock-Bottom Expectations
- Aaron Regunberg: The Terrible Cost of High-Stakes Testing
- Julia Steiny: Testing for Pleasure Would Improve Achievement
- LISTEN: Opposition to NECAP Testing
- NEW: Groups Rip “High Stakes” Standardized Testing in Schools
- NEW: Groups Seek to Ban ‘High Stakes Testing’ in Schools
- Opponents Pledge to Fight High-Stakes Testing
- RI Students Show Progress in Annual Testing
Comments:
Eloise O'Shea-Wyatt
6:30am on Friday, March 08, 2013
Testing, is racist and unjust period. The powers that be know full well what outcomes will be. Suburban students will score proficient for the most part and poor non-white urban children for the most part will not score proficient.
Ms Stieny has been spewing this kind of "we know whats best for these poor children" for way too long and it is time for her to stop. It is time for real honesty about educational inequality here in Rhode Island and in the country.
When yiou give a test where the outcomes are already known then you are just justifying the very wrong polcies that created the problems. This does not solve anything and it is wrong.
Eloise O'Shea-Wyatt
12:16pm on Friday, March 08, 2013
Testing, is racist and unjust period. The powers that be know full well what outcomes will be. Suburban students will score proficient for the most part and poor non-white urban children for the most part will not score proficient.
Ms Stieny has been spewing this kind of "we know whats best for these poor children" for way too long and it is time for her to stop. It is time for real honesty about educational inequality here in Rhode Island and in the country.
When yiou give a test where the outcomes are already known then you are just justifying the very wrong polcies that created the problems. This does not solve anything and it is wrong.
Gov- stench
9:44am on Saturday, March 09, 2013
Public education has been on the decline for years. RI has thrown money at P/E and has been given short thrift. Public education was intended to give people a basic education, it was never intended to compete with private schools. With all the "nannys" out there wanting public education to do more and more, it has lowered the bar to the floor by graduating students that can't even do fractions or reasonably communicate. Government has come in with a patchwork of measures to shore up this "beast" but it has been given bad leadership from both the federal and state bureaucracies. We need to go back to basics to turn this around but I just don't think with the present leadership we have today, that will ever happen.