Jencunas: Obama’s State of the Union Victory Lap - and Wish List

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

 

View Larger +

President Barack Obama

The Democratic Party may have been dealt a resounding defeat in November’s midterm elections, but nobody would have known that listening to President Obama’s State of the Union address. 

The speech was one part political victory lap and one part policy wish list, part of a larger plan by the White House to remain relevant on public policy and position the Democratic candidate for victory in 2016. 

The first goal, relevance on public policy, is unachievable even if Obama gave a speech that made Franklin Roosevelt sound like Jimmy Carter. With two years to go in his Presidency and his party in the minority in Congress, Obama is a lame duck. 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

Rather than accept bad deals and compromises with the White House, Republicans will rather wait and hope for victory in 2016. If they win, they’ll get more of what they want in policy. If a Democrat wins, then Republicans might compromise, but there’s no reason to do so now.

The only victories Obama will get with Congress are on areas where he agrees with Republicans. The two most likely areas for this are new free trade agreements, where most Democrats actually oppose Obama, and criminal justice reform, where there is an emerging bipartisan consensus that too many people are in jail.

The most unrealistic part of Obama’s speech was bragging about foreign policy. Terrorist groups are becoming more powerful, Iran continues towards nuclear capability, and the military is preparing to evacuate Middle Eastern embassies. This is only foreign policy victory if the bar for success is set so low that simply avoiding another 9/11 is an achievement. 

Another baffling segment was Obama’s alarmism about climate change, which he contradicted with his policy proposals. If Obama really wanted to take action against climate change he would be trying to fund his new social programs through a tax on carbon, not a tax on investment and inheritance. Politically though, empty rhetoric makes sense on climate change, which is an issue of great importance to many Democratic donors but regularly ranks near the bottom of voters’ priorities in public opinion polling.

Rhetorically, the speech was predictable but well-written. Obama focused on the rebounding economy, unsurprising since the combination of falling unemployment and low gas prices have led to Obama’s surging job approval numbers. He took credit about the falling deficit, while conveniently forgetting that his administration fought the budget cuts that helped achieve our rosy fiscal picture. 

This victory lap will be the first part of the Democratic political narrative – the economy is improving and the deficit is down. This is a good message for Democrats, though hardly an electoral silver bullet since polling shows most Americans still suffer from stagnant wages and think the country is on the wrong track. 

Bragging about Obama’s achievements won’t be enough for a Democrat to win in 2016. After all, Al Gore lost to George W. Bush in 2000 despite enjoying a much stronger economy than there is today. Democrats need a message beyond celebration, which is why Obama trumpeted three new policies: free community college; higher taxes on banks, inheritance, and investment; and tax credits for low-income workers and parents. 

He believes these can form the core of a Democratic agenda that makes the Republicans look like the party of the rich while the Democrats look like the party fighting for regular Americans. 

Faced with Obama’s seemingly sound political logic, how should Republicans react?  By accepting the most popular parts of Obama’s agenda and countering his plan for wealth redistribution with a plan for income growth. 

American voters don’t like wealth redistribution. Even faced with stagnating wages and income inequality, voters will prefer a program that increases incomes rather than redistributes them once the money has been earned. Republicans need to develop a clear plan for raising incomes that their candidate can use in 2016. This column isn’t about public policy but the campaign phrases are simple – Obama wants to tax investment and small businesses to redistribute wealth; Republicans want to help working families grow their incomes. 

If the Democrats embrace the message Obama laid out in the State of the Union, they will be identified with an agenda that American voters have never supported. Obama talked about turning the page in his speech, but his message is one that American voters will be happy to turn the page on in the 2016 elections.

View Larger +

Brian Jencunas works as a communications and media consultant. During the 2014 Providence mayoral election, he worked with the Cianci campaign, focusing on messaging and polling analysis.

 

Related Slideshow: 10 Questions Raimondo Has to Answer as Governor

View Larger +
Prev Next

Moving the needle?

Forbes recently ranked Rhode Island 5th worst in the country for business environment -- a not uncommon position for the Ocean State in recent years.  Forbes placed RI as high as 20th for quality of life -- but #49 for "regulatory environment."

How soon can Governor-elect Raimondo improve Rhode Island's basement-level assessment and make it more competitive -- and what will she have to do to make that happen?  Addressing the sales tax? Estate tax?  Look to Raimondo's State of the State address -- and first budget proposal -- for signs as to how the direction the new Governor plans on taking the state.  
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Gambling hole?

As GoLocal's Stephen Beale pointed out, RI has no plan to deal with $307,000,000 shortfall, when casinos in MA are operational, and RI's third largest source of revenue -- gaming and the Division of Lottery -- will take a huge hit.  "A consultant's report showed Rhode Island losing $108.8 million a year in casino gaming revenue by 2017. And that was a best case scenario. The worst case had the state bleeding $158.4 million by 2017," wrote Beale.

How will Governor-elect Raimondo deal with the 800-pound gorilla in the room?  Newport Grand failed in its bid for table games on the ballot in November.  Will Raimondo let the General Assembly continue to prop up the ailing slots parlor?
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

RhodeMap RI?

The previously little-known economic development plan under the State's Division of Planning -- made possible by a federal HUD grant -- has heated up in a big way as opponents are voicing their concerns as to the scope and reach of the plan, if incorporated into the state's broader economic plan.  

Will Governor-elect Raimondo get behind RhodeMap RI's vision fully, and how would she address detractors who don't appear to be going away at any point soon?  Given that there will most likely need to be legislative components to implement the plan, watch to see where Raimondo's leadership is on this issue. 
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Marijuana legalization?

Some of the air came out of the marijuana legalization balloon when former Speaker of the House Gordon Fox stepped down last year, and the notably more conservative Speaker Nicholas Mattiello took the helm, making the prospect of a marijuana legalization bill appear dim, at best.  

The Daily Chronic reported that the Democratic gubernatorial candidates indicated during the campaign that they were "monitoring the effects of regulation and taxation in Colorado and Washington."  Raimondo's certainly given no indication she'd be inclined to consider a tax-and-legalize measure, but as gaming revenues start to taper off, will marijuana discussion ramp up as a new revenue option?  
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Union relations?

While Raimondo appointed five transition team members with big banking ties, she also appointed two union heads -- Pat Quinn with SEIU 1199 and Michael Sabitoni with the RI Building and Construction Trades Council.  

While Raimondo managed to secure union endorsements following a primary that saw them go primarily to opponents Angel Taveras and Clay Pell, the legacy of her pension reform still looms large (remember AFSCME famously hired Forbes' Edward Siedle to investigate Raimondo's handling of the state pension fund, namely her move into hedge funds).  How will Raimondo negotiate with public sector unions given a past history? 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Pension Lawsuit?

What will come of the pension reform lawsuit?  While it was quiet leading up to the election following the failed settlement earlier in the year, watch to see the next steps from Raimondo -- and newly elected Treasurer Seth Magaziner (who appointed a fairly union-friendly transition team) to see what attempts may arise to reach a new settlement -- and what implications that may mean for Raimondo, the architect of the landmark 2011 pension overhaul. Depending on the outcome, watch to see how Raimondo's political star rises -- or falls -- from the outcome of the suit -- and how Raimondo addresses the financial implications if a mediated settlement is achieved.  

View Larger +
Prev Next

Budget proposal?

All eyes will be on Raimondo's first budget proposal in January.  What will her priorities be?  Will there be bold moves to improve the state's business climate? Education, infrastructure, tax code -- how will Raimondo choose to tackle the state's biggest issues?  And will the Democratic leadership agree with her agenda?
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

General Assembly?

For the first time since 1991 -- when Governor Bruce Sundlun took office -- a Democrat will be embarking on a gubernatorial administration, and Raimondo will be working with a Democratic legislature.  What will Raimondo's working relationship be with Speaker Mattiello and Senate President Paiva-Weed?  Will the General Assembly be in lockstep with a Raimondo agenda -- if not, what will the points of contention be?  And with a democratic lock on power, what will the Republicans be able to accomplish?  
 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Mandate issue?

Winning the general election to become Rhode Island's first female Governor with 40% of the vote, Raimondo follows in the footsteps of Governor Lincoln Chafee with winning with less that 50% of the vote.  Raimondo however has the advantage over her predecessor by being elected as a Democrat, allowing her to work with leadership in the General Assembly.  However, with 40% of the vote, how will the public who didn't vote for her view here policies and proposals?  Will Raimondo have to win over the public, or will Raimondo take her support from the business community and forge a path regardless?

View Larger +
Prev Next

Transparency?

While General Treasurer, Raimondo came under fire for lack of transparency for the lack of disclosure of hedge fund fees paid for the state's retirement investments, punctuated by Attorney General Peter Kilmartin ruling that Raimondo could keep certain details of the state's investments from the press.   Forbes' Edward Siedle wrote, Does [Kilmartin] seriously believe that hedge and private equity billionaires entrusted with state workers retirement savings should be shielded from scrutiny regarding potential violations of law?
While Raimondo will no longer be calling the shots as the head of the State Investment Commission, all eyes will be her decisions in the Governor's office.  How transparent with the Raimondo administration be with the press-- and the public?
 

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook