Guest MINDSETTER™ Rep. Hull: Time for Providence to Reestablish Residency

Monday, April 03, 2017

 

View Larger +

The best decision I ever made as a police officer wasn’t something I did on the job. It was when I bought my house on Mt. Pleasant Avenue. I chose to stay in Providence, where I grew up and where I am privileged to serve as a police officer and a state representative. 

Living in Providence means I don’t only see the city’s residents at their worst moments, when they’ve been the victim of a crime or made a choice that led to them being arrested. Instead, they’re the neighbors I see at church, at the grocery store, and when we shovel our driveways together after a storm. When they need my help, I’m here and can quickly address their concerns. More importantly, people know they can approach me because I’m a neighbor, not a stranger in a blue uniform. This wouldn’t happen if I worked from nine to five then drove home to the suburbs.

Unfortunately, most city employees didn’t make the same choice I did. Sixty-five percent of municipal workers, and 82% of the police and fire department, live somewhere else. Right now, the public safety commissioner takes his salary of over $155,000 home to pay property taxes in Cranston where he resides. Providence’s police chief takes his money to East Greenwich, while the Director of Emergency Management takes his paycheck home to Portsmouth. 

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

I know from personal experience that Providence’s employees are devoted to their jobs, but there is no substitute for residency to make city workers true stakeholders in our city’s success. The mayor and state legislature need to reexamine the residency requirement for city workers. This was the law until 2005 and changing it was a big mistake by Rhode Island’s lawmakers.

Government functions best when it’s employees are personally invested in the community they serve. A residency requirement would make Providence’s workforce more diverse without having to resort to hiring quotas or controversial affirmative action plans. Additionally, when city workers pay the taxes that fund their salaries and benefits, unions are more likely to weigh the financial impacts of their demands instead of viewing city taxpayers as an ATM that will never run out of money. The city pays generous salaries and good benefits. It’s only fair that the money stays in our economy rather than going to places like Cranston, Barrington, East Greenwich, and other communities.

Residency requirements would immediately reduce income inequality in Providence. In my lifetime, I’ve seen a lot of positive change here in the capital city. But at the same time, our middle-class has been hollowed out just like most major cities, especially in the last decade. There are increasingly two Providences – one for wealthy professionals and another for low-income residents struggling to make ends meet. Keeping middle-class municipal jobs in our city would help change that dynamic

As a candidate for mayor, Jorge Elorza vowed to require all his department heads to live in Providence. Instead, the mayor’s actions haven’t lived up to his promises. Many of his directors, including the leadership of Public Safety, Public Works, and the Emergency Management Department, live outside the city. The most recent class of police academy recruits, the first one under Mayor Elorza, draws only a third of its members from city residents. Of that third, many will leave Providence as soon as they become police officers. The same pattern will be true of the new firefighters and teachers hired by Elorza’s administration. Regrettably, his campaign trail commitment was just empty rhetoric.

Residency works. It makes city workers invested in the community they serve. It boosts the city’s economy and reduces income inequality. Unions ask for more reasonable contracts since their members pay the taxes that fund their salaries. Residency is an idea whose time has come.  

View Larger +

Ray Hull is a state representative in District 6 (Providence/North Providence) and a sergeant with the Providence Police Department.

 

Related Slideshow: 2016 Common Cause Legislative Rankings

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score 68%

Marvin Abney

District: 73

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: no votes

Open Government: 67%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 21

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 2

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score 72%

Mia Ackerman

District: 45

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: no votes

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 81%

Edith Ajello 

District: 1

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5

Did not Vote: 2

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 63%

Joseph Almeida 

District: 12

Party: D

 

Ethics: 0%

Campaign Elections: 50%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 18

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7

Did not Vote: 7

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Gregg Amore 

District:  65

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Samuel Azzinaro 

District: 37

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Jean Barros 

District: 59

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform:  100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

David Bennett 

District: 20

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Christopher Blazejewski

District: 2

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Dennis Canario 

District: 71

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 56%

John Carnevale 

District: 13

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 0%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 33%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 16

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 7

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Lauren Carson 

District: 75

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

 

PHOTO: laurencarson.com

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Stephen Casey 

District: 50

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 78%

Michael Chippendale 

District: 40

Party: R

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 50%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 68% 

Arthur Corvese 

District: 55

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 50%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 21

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 84%

Doreen Costa 

District: 31

Party: R

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 100%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 27

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Gregory Costantino

District: 44

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 51%

David Coughlin Jr. 

District: 60

Party: D

 

Ethics:  100% 

Campaign Elections: 38% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 14

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 9

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Robert Craven, Sr. 

District: 32

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

John DeSimone 

District: 5

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 68%

Grace Diaz

District: 11

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 50%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 21

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 2

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

John Edwards

District: 70

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 64% 

Deborah Fellella 

District: 43

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 25% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 19

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 8

Did not Vote: 5

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 66% 

Blake Filippi 

District: 36

Party: 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 38% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 0% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 21

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 11

Did not Vote: 0 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 65% 

Raymond Gallison Jr.

District: 69

Party: D

 

Ethics: 0% 

Campaign Elections: 81% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 50% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 13

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7 

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 78% 

Antonio Giarrusso

District: 30

Party: 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 63% 

Judicial Reform:  100% 

Open Government: 33% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Arthur Handy 

District: 18

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 78% 

Joy Hearn 

District: 66

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 75% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7 

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Raymond Hull 

District: 6

Party: 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 56% 

Robert Jacquard 

District: 17

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 13% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 16

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 7 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Ranking: 72% 

Raymond Johnston Jr. 

District: 61

Party: 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Katherine Kazarian 

District: 63

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Cale Keable 

District: 47

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Brian Kennedy 

District: 38

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 0%

Donald Lally 

District: 33

Party: D

 

Ethics:  0% 

Campaign Elections: 0% 

Judicial Reform:  0% 

Open Government: 50% 

Separation of Government: 0% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 0

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 3

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 78%

Robert Lancia 

District: 16 

Party: R

 

Ethics:  100% 

Campaign Elections:  63% 

Judicial Reform:  100% 

Open Government: 33% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Charlene Lima 

District: 14

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

John Lombardi 

District: 8

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Ranking: 63 % 

Karen MacBeth

District: 52

Party: R

 

Ethics:  0% 

Campaign Elections: 25% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 0% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 17

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5

Did not Vote: 10 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Shelby Maldonado

District: 56

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 75% 

Jan Malik 

District: 67

Party: D

 

Ethics:  100% 

Campaign Elections: 75% 

Judicial Reform:  100% 

Open Government:  0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6

Did not Vote: 3

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 84% 

Michael Marcello 

District: 41

Party: D

 

Ethics:  100% 

Campaign Elections:  75% 

Judicial Reform:  100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 27

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 59% 

Kenneth Marshall 

District: 68

Party:

 

Ethics:  100%

Campaign Elections:  13% 

Judicial Reform:  100% 

Open Government: 33% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 17

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 6

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Nichola Mattiello

District: 15

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 74% 

Carol Hagen McEntee 

District: 33

Party: D

 

Ethics:  100% 

Campaign Elections: 38% 

Judicial Reform:  100% 

Open Government: 50% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 17

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6

Did not Vote: 0

PHOTO: Independentri.com

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Daniel McKiernan 

District: 7

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

PHOTO: Twitter

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 79%

James McLaughlin 

District: 57

Party: D

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 100% 

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6

Did not Vote: 1

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Joseph McNamara

District: 19

Party: D 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Hello Melo

District: 64

Party: D 

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Mary Messier 

District: 62 

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 79%

Patricia Morgan 

District: 26 

Party: R 

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 63%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 33% 

Separation of Government: 0%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 24

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5

Did not Vote: 3

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Michael Morin 

District: 49 

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 84% 

Robert Nardolillo 

District: 28 

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 100%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 27

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 5

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 61%

Eileen Naughton 

District: 21

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 13

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 19

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 10

Did not Vote: 3

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 62%

Brian Newberry 

District: 48 

Party: R 

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 25% 

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 19

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 10

Did not Vote: 3

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 78% 

Jared Nunes 

District: 25

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 75% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 25 

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

William O'Brien 

District: 54 

Party:  D

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72% 

Jeremiah O'Grady

District: 46 

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 45% 

Thomas Palangio 

District: 3

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections:  38% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 100% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes:11

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6

Did not Vote: 15

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 59% 

Robert Phillips 

District: 51 

Party: D 

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 25% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 19 

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 13

Did not Vote: 0 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 70% 

Justin Price 

District:  39 

Party: R 

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 50% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 0% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 22

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 1

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 74%

Aaron Regunberg 

District:  4

Party: D

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 75% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 7

Did not Vote: 2

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 70% 

Daniel Reilly 

District:  72

Party: R 

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 63% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 22

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 1

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 69% 

Sherry Roberts 

District:  29 

Party: R 

 

 

Ethics: 100% 

Campaign Elections: 63% 

Judicial Reform: 100% 

Open Government: 0% 

Separation of Government: 100% 

Pro Common Cause Votes: 22

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 10

Did not Vote: 0 

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Deborah Ruggiero 

District: 74 

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Patricia Serpa 

District: 27

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Joseph Shekarchi

District: 23

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 73%

Scott Slater 

District: 10

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 8

Did not Vote: 1

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Joseph Solomon Jr. 

District: 22

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Teresa Ann Tanzi 

District: 34

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 70%

Carlos Tobon

District: 58

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 63%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 22

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 1

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 69%

Joseph Trillo

District: 24

Party: R

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 63%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 33%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 21

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 8

Did not Vote: 3

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 62%

Stephen Ucci

District: 42 

Party: D 

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 0%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 17

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 6

Did not Vote: 9

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Anastasia Williams

District: 9

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

View Larger +
Prev Next

Final Score: 72%

Thomas Winfield 

District: 53 

Party:

 

 

Ethics: 100%

Campaign Elections: 75%

Judicial Reform: 100%

Open Government: 0%

Separation of Government: 100%

Pro Common Cause Votes: 23

Anti-Common Cause Votes: 9

Did not Vote: 0

 
 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

 
 

Sign Up for the Daily Eblast

I want to follow on Twitter

I want to Like on Facebook