Gemma Says Brown Poll Showing Cicilline Lead Is ‘Meaningless’
Friday, August 06, 2010
a new Brown University poll that shows primary opponent David Cicilline with the lead as “statistically invalid and politically meaningless.”
In the poll, Cicilline had 32 percent of the vote, while Gemma had 11 percent. The other two primary candidates, Bill Lynch and David Segal, and 15 and 5 percent respectively.
“The margin of error in this poll is an unheard of 7.4 percent,” Gemma said. “Brown polled only 174 voters to reach their conclusions. These numbers tell us nothing about this race, and to be blunt, I am both disappointed in and perplexed by Brown’s decision to publish the results of such unscientifically conducted polling.”
“The New York Times does not publish results with a margin of error higher than 5 percent,” said Gemma, quoting from the New York Times standards for use. “As recently as last February, Brown conducted a poll with a statewide random sample of 605 individuals—this is more than three times the size of the sample represented in Brown’s poll on the First District congressional race.”
- Anthony Gemma Announces Run for Congress
- Does Patrick Lynch’s Exit Help His Brother Bill?
- Exclusive: Gemma’s Plan for Transforming Government
- BREAKING: Brown Poll Shakes Up Political Race
- Gemma Launches Special iPhone App for His Campaign
- Cicilline with Money Lead, But Gemma’s in the Game
- Gemma Proposes Increasing Social Security Benefits
- Congressional Candidates Meet for First Debate
- Gemma Criticizes Schilling Deal
- Cicilline Kicks Off Campaign for Congress
- Gemma: My Plan for Citizen-Driven Government
- Democratic Bloodbath?
- John DePetro: Will it Be a Summer of Blood in Rhode Island?
- Democratic Chair and Prov Mayor are Snubbed by Teachers Union