Fecteau: An Inspiring March Against Gun Violence
Tuesday, March 27, 2018
It was also remarkable watching people from such widely varying backgrounds come together to make our country safer. They were coming together to rally against a political system that failed them and a legal system that encourages the kind of firearms ownership that could potentially kill them. They made it clear that pro-gun advocates will no longer have a monopoly on activism and political power.
This has been going on for simply too long. Lobbyists and corporate interest groups have hijacked our political system. The gun lobby, far more interested in lining its pockets with money from gun manufacturers than keeping our children safe, has dominated the conversation around guns for far too long. The majority of Americans who support common-sense gun safety laws have stood by complicity as pro-gun radicals have dominated the conversation. Our legislators have even eroded the basic protections that would reduce the likelihood of many of these mass killings from occurring – most notoriously letting the assault weapons ban expire
We already know many of the solutions to gun violence. Even something as simple as universal background checks would go far to protect innocent lives. As of right now, only federally licensed dealers have to perform background checks when they sell guns. If an individual is unlicensed, he or she faces no such prerequisite. It’s a bizarre system that only requires the most responsible gun dealers to conduct background checks while exempting the kind of fly-by-night sellers who would be most likely to sell deadly weapons to a mentally disturbed individual.
This is known as the ‘gun show loophole.’ It probably should be called the private seller loophole because the sale doesn’t actually need to be at a gun show. Universal background checks would require all sellers – licensed or unlicensed – to conduct a background check when they sell a firearm.
Many of the young people who marched this weekend are not yet able to vote, but that will soon change this coming midterm election. Soon enough, many of the young people will be able to hold politicians accountable at the ballot box. Their legislators have now been put on notice that they need to do something about gun violence or be voted out of office.
I hope the March for Our Lives will change the political dynamics that leave many of us complicit in the next mass shooting. It is tragic that after all the mass shootings our country has experienced and all the lives lost due to gun violence, adults have failed so dearly.
Let’s keep marching ‘for our lives’ into the future and into the voting booth, if not the chants, rallies, and solidarity are meaningless to the entrenched political establishment. These demonstrations are inspiring to me, and prove that it is still possible for Americans to come together and demand politicians take action – no matter what the gun lobby has to say about it.
Related Slideshow: GoLocal: Benchmark Poll, October 2017
Next year, in November of 2018, there will be a statewide general election for Governor and many other state offices. How likely is it that you will vote in this election?
Will you definitely be voting, will you probably be voting, are you 50-50...
Definitely be voting: 78%
Probably be voting: 13%
What would you say is the number one problem facing Rhode Island that you would like the Governor to address?
Jobs and economy: 21%
State budget: 9%
Corruption/Public integrity: .8%
Don’t know: .9%
Recently, a proposal has been made to permit the issuance of $81 million in bonds by the State to build a new stadium for the Pawtucket Red Sox. If there was an election today on this issue, would you vote to approve or reject issuing $81 million in financing supported moral obligation bonds to build the stadium?
Net: Approve: 28%
Definitely approve: 15%
Probably approve: 14%
Net: Reject: 67%
Probably reject: 19%
Definitely reject: 48%
Don't know: 4%
The next question is about the total income of YOUR HOUSEHOLD for the PAST 12 MONTHS. Please include your income PLUS the income of all members living in your household (including cohabiting partners and armed forces members living at home).
$50,000 or less: 27%
More $50,000 but less than $75,000: 13%
More $75,000 but less than $100,000: 13%
More $100,000 but less than $150,000: 17%
$150,000 or more: 13%
Don't know/refused: 17%
What particular ethnic group or nationality - such as English, French, Italian, Irish, Latino, Jewish, African American, and so forth - do you consider yourself a part of or feel closest to?
Black or African American: 6%
- Fecteau: We Killed Benny’s
- Fecteau: A Rare Moment of Bipartisanship
- Fecteau: Trump’s Pivot
- Fecteau: Backlash at the Harvard Kennedy School
- Fecteau: The Rocket Man & the Dotard – Worried Yet?
- Fecteau: Block Voting
- Fecteau: Cicilline’s Republican Challenger
- Fecteau: Trump’s Nuke Bluff Backfired
- Fecteau: The Name Game in Charlottesville
- Democrats May Just Miss Bannon, MINDSETTER™ Fecteau
- Fecteau: Trump Goes Obama-Lite in Afghanistan
- Fecteau: Trump vs. the NFL
- Fecteau: A Federal Failure in Puerto Rico
- Fecteau: Moore’s Morality Matters
- Fecteau: End the War On Terror
- Fecteau: Moore Madness From Trump
- Fecteau Looking to Run for Pawtucket State Senate Seat
- Fecteau: A Greener Alternative to the Burrillville Plant, Please
- Fecteau: Disrespecting Our Fallen Heroes
- Fecteau: Dear Mr. Trump, Decertify This
- Fecteau: Don’t Scrap the Iran Nuclear Deal
- Fecteau: Talk About Gun Violence
- Fecteau: Will Trump’s Rhetoric Help Rein in Gun Violence?
- Fecteau: The War Forward in Afghanistan – What Is It?
- Fecteau: Senate Candidate Nick Autiello’s Convenient Political Progression