| | Advanced Search

 

Half of RI Renters Spend Over 30% of Income on Rent—Half of RI Renters Spend Over 30% of…

LEGAL MATTERS: How To Beat That Speeding Ticket—avoid the insurance hikes with these easy tips

Dealing With Late Spring Allergies—Kent Hospital Expert—Ah, ah, ahhhhhhchoooooo.....

Michael King Continues to Dominate for Undefeated Hendricken Baseball—Hendricken sticks to winning ways...

Smithfield’s Matt Kuhar Gunning for State Tennis Title—Tennis star continues success...

B’s Win Game 3, Push Rangers To The Brink—take a commanding 3-0 lead in series

Marin, Brown Announce First Recruiting Class—adds 6 players to the program

Providence Mayoral Race Taking Shape—Providence Mayoral Race Taking Shape

NEW: Block Announces Candidacy for Governor in 2014—NEW: Block Announces Candidacy for Governor in 2014

RICares Changing Addiction Conversation—RICares Changing Addiction Conversation

 
 

Don Roach: Mike Riley can Beat Jim Langevin

Wednesday, July 04, 2012

 

If I say the name, Michael Riley, does anything come to mind? Nothing? That’s ok because Michael Riley is a name you will get to know over the next several months especially if you live in the second Congressional District. Riley is fighting Michael Gardner for the right to challenge incumbent Jim Langevin. Langevin has represented the 2nd District since 2001. Most recently in 2010, Langevin defeated current RI GOP Chair, Mark Zaccaria, and Independent, John Matson, carrying sixty (60) percent of the district.

It’s about the money

Zaccaria fought a great race, financially he did not have enough to compete with Langevin. For perspective at the end of the first quarter in 2010, Langevin held approximately $420,000 on hand whereas Zaccaria had a little over 53,000. That’s an 8 to 1 advantage and simply put, it’s difficult to compete against an opponent who is able to so easily outspend you.

In this race, Riley won’t enjoy a numerical advantage over Langevin in terms of dollars, but Langevin’s advantage is not as wide as it was against Zaccaria. As of the Q1 filing, Langevin held approximately $280,000 to Riley’s $111,000. That’s about a 2.5 to 1 advantage meaning Riley certainly faces an uphill battle but it appears he should be able to sustain monetary competitiveness with Langevin. Against a five time incumbent in one of the most Democratic states in the union, that’s step one in the twelve step program to elect a Republican to a congressional seat.

Who is Michael Riley?

Step two is establishing your brand. Riley is a complete unknown to the political scene as far as I am aware. He’s a hedge fund manager – yes, cringe you progressive sycophants! From his campaign website it seems his company has won a couple of awards recently and he appears to be a respected leader in his Narragansett community. He’s married with three children. That’s all great but I’m sure you’re more interested in his stance on issues. I’ll just summarize a few of the topics from his campaign website:

Education – Riley believes that we can’t promise benefits to educators that we can’t afford (read: pensions). He also states that we high school graduates should have fundamental finance knowledge. Lastly, he believes charter schools offer a different and thus far successful alternative that should be explored further.

Economy – Riley considers himself a fiscal conservative and states that is the number one reason he’s running for Congress. He chastises the Obama administration for increasing our national debt and instead believes we should “provide an economic environment that fosters entrepreneurship and confidence that sustains that growth.”

Immigration – Riley believes there are not enough visas for the number of people who wish to come to the country. He also states that border security is paramount to a comprehensive immigration reform bill that he suggests needs passage.

Check out his website further for his views on Defense & Foreign Policy, the Environment, and a number of others. For a more in-depth look at his views you’ll need to contact his campaign team which you can also reach via his website.

Not easy to compare Langevin and Riley

As for Congressman Langevin’s website, you can’t really get a summary of his positions on the issues. He certainly has a number of press releases, videos of him speaking in various locals, and blog posts on specific issues but his website isn’t summarized the way Riley’s is. That’s not a nitpick just doesn’t make it overly easy for the voter to view similarities and differences between the candidates at a glance.

One thing I will note that is erroneous on the Langevin website is where the site states – “As he nears the end of his fifth term, Jim is honored to have received over 70 percent of the vote in each of his re-elections (bold mine). As previously noted, Langevin received 60 percent of the vote in the 2010 race not really close to 70. If any Langevin staffer is reading this, making an update would be a good idea.

Obviously, that’s a small issue and no one should make voting decisions based on this, but it does beg the question does Langevin feel he’s undefeatable and thus does not need to pay as close attention to his own messaging or that of his opponents? Langevin’s posting of his Washington priorities most recently occurred in June 2011. He did post again in November last year but his post mostly related to internet security. I understand internet security is one of a number of important issues, but I tend to think Rhode Islanders are more focused on not getting overly taxed and making sure they have a job.

Is it time for a new voice in Washington?

That’s the question. I recently reached out to Riley to ask him a few questions about his campaign and what he hopes to do to help Rhode Islanders. If he is willing to respond, we’ll have a chance to determine if Riley is the right man for the job. As it stands, I’m just excited that Langevin will have to take on a determined challenger and one who appears to have enough financial support to ensure Langevin talks about his record and why Rhode Islanders should send him back to Washington.

I invite you to take a look at both Langevin and Riley’s websites as you make your selection this November. Assuming that both are able to win their primaries, we’ll have an interesting decision to make, and what we need to ask – at least what I believe we should ask – is who is going to be the Congressman that will bring jobs, not 38 Studios-type jobs, but real jobs to Rhode Island so that our economy is able to bounce back on its feet?

If the answer to that question is not Jim Langevin, then our decision will be easy.

Don Roach is a member of the RI Young Republicans. He can be reached at don@donroach.org.

 

Editor's Note: This original version of this piece incorrectly suggested Abel Collins was a Democrat. He is running as an Independent.
 

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Jonathan Flynn

Wishful, if not delusional thinking.

Bill Buckley

Mike Riley is the most credible & qualified candidate running against Langevin. www.rileycongress.com He is one of the best candidates we’ve seen in a long while. I've listened to several radio & TV interviews he has done and he is impressive. Jim Langevin needs to move on! He's occupied that seat for five terms and has accomplished nothing. In fact he's been part of the problem. Langevin has been a Pelosi –Obama rubber stamp. If you’re happy with the way things are going; vote for Langivin. I'll be voting for Riley.

Jonathan Flynn

I thought Bill Buckley was dead.

Jonathan Flynn

Just ask President Elect Newt.

W. Walwyn

Mr. Roach, I think you should take a couple things into consideration here:

1. Mr. Collins is running as an independent. Mr. Matson is Mr. Langevin's Democratic opponent.
2. 2010 was considered a "wave" year for Republicans, meaning Mr. Langevin's donors might've been far more motivated to throw money to him to ward off a possible Republican threat. Of course, this is conjecture.
3. Hedge fund managers and anyone who smacks of Wall St. remain some of the most disliked people in this country, regardless of their personal character.

Finally, it should be noted that Mr. Langevin is perhaps one of the most unobjectionable members of Congress. Even if District 2 is the "more conservative" of the two districts, Mr. Langevin has done nothing to upset the independents in his district nor has he incurred the wrath of Democratic partisans. While the comparatively few Republicans in this state may be salivating at the possibility of picking up both House seats (or in their wildest dreams, all federal offices up for election this year), they should focus their efforts on the one winnable race they have: District 1.

Colonel Bowie

Unobjectionable???Langevin???Probably Whitehouse too????
The silence of our congressional district is deafening.
Whitehouse visits Occupy Providence but calls the Tea party "right wing militias and Aryan hate groups..." Langevin says he is proud of passing OBAMACARE, the most filthfully passed piece of legislation in memory that was shoved down the throat of Americans by Pelosi,Langevin,Whitehouse and friends...Thanks for the new taxes fellas!!! Not a peep about AG Holder withholding evidence in a "MURDER" of a Federal officer...Not a peep about our President invoking 'executive privilege' over a matter he stated he knew nothing about...Langevin not voting to hold Holder in contempt which is a slap in the face to every law enforcement officer in the USA and
the grieving Holder family (POLITICS???Nah...)there's more BUT..John Wayne put it best in the 1960 movie, The Alamo. "There's right and wrong in this world. Do one and you're living. Do the other and you might be walking around, but you're dead as a beaver hat!" Langevin and Whitehouse are dead as beaver hats. VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Jonathan Flynn

I love how Republicans, like former President Reagan, love to quote movies. How about reality? Too much to ask from the Fox Noise crew.

Colonel Bowie

Jonathan F.
How about the TRUTH?
Someday you will have to face it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(No movie quote there....reality Jonathan!)

Donn Roach

W. Walwin -

Thanks regarding number one. My apologies for mixing that up. Not sure how I did that. I believe Matson was an Independent in 2010 and I assumed he would be in 2012 and I didn't validate.

Riley is a credible candidate. As he gets his message out there he'll pick up some ground. We need more than having the most 'unobjectionable' member of Congress. We need someone who will be willing to be objectionable in order to obtain wins for RI.

Jonathan Flynn

How about a "real name" Mr. Col. Knife. On this day above all others, along with Memorial Day and Veteran's Day, you shouldn't use a earned rank in your name. Courts have recently decided to lie about such things is free speech and I technically agree, but to do so is an abomination and an insult to all those brave men and women who have sacrificed to EARN that title. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Jonathan Flynn

Don, you are always wrong. Today, you can't even spell your name. So much for Republican pundits.

Chris Baker

My hope is that for this election (and all others), voters will be less dogmatic (read: eliminate virtuous grandstanding) and, instead, focus on electing citizens to represent them who are pragmatic and performance focused. Being a hedge fund manager, Riley lives this philosophy every day. Being pigheaded means big losses. Being open-minded and "talking with your ears" often leads to gains.

Unequivocally, Riley would represent Rhode Island better than Langevin. Riley would be respected by his congressional peers (not avoided or minimalized) and be in a position to work on significant legislation to keep both Rhode Island and our country growing to benefit everyone, especially our children. I wish there were two of him.

~ Chris Baker

Colonel Bowie

Mr. FLYNN:
How about the issues...? Huh??? AND I am not a Republican!!!
The Colonel!!!!




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.