| | Advanced Search


Trinity Rep to Debut Great Writers Series for 2014-2015 Season—Trinity Rep will present the Great Writers Series…

newportFILM To Present Last Two Outdoor Screenings of the Summer—newportFILM will host their last two outdoor screenings…

Narragansett Bay Ranked #5 as Best for Boaters in US—Providence has ranked as the #5 best region…

Chef Walter’s Flavors + Knowledge: Red Peppers and Potatoes Frittata—End of summer combination with red peppers and…

Rhode Island Ranked Third Worst in Nation for Online College Students—Rhode Island has ranked as the third worst…

Arrivals & Departures Highlight Emotional Day At Gillette Stadium—The New England Patriots and New England Revolution…

Block Calls Out Raimondo For Failing To Support 2010 Tax Reform—Republican candidate for Governor Ken Block has blasted…

Fung Blasts Block for Government Contract Extension and Refusal to Release Tax Returns—Republican candidate for Governor Allan Fung has called…

Saul Kaplan: 3 Simple Words to Revolutionize the World—How many people end business meetings with an…

Coming to Rhythm and Roots - Charles Bradley—Charles Bradley is experiencing a late life awakening.


Don Roach: Diversity is Overrated

Wednesday, February 20, 2013


Don Roach says diversity for the sake of diversity is mindless.

Diversity as we have come to define it is overrated. Way overrated. I read through GoLocal’s thorough analysis of diversity throughout the state’s high schools and the question that kept coming back to me was the simple - who cares?

Who cares if one school has 90% whites, 5% Blacks, and 5% everything else? Who cares if another school has 50% Hispanics, 30% blacks, and 20% everything else? Are we to laud a school because its demographics happen to be more colorful than another’s? High-five yourself Providence, you’ve got diverse schools!! Doesn’t matter that most are failing to actually educate their diverse populations, hang your hat on diversity!

But let’s step back from Rhode Island school diversity and look at the concept of diversity itself. I’ve always had a problem with seeking diversity for the sake of diversity. We live in America where we value people as the cliché goes who “pull themselves up from their bootstraps” and make a life for themselves. We believe America is the place where anyone can and has done this. Sure, it’s not as simple as that but that’s the ideal. Yet, we also have a nagging history of being some of the most racist and insensitive people on the planet. It’s a paradox, but it’s our paradox.

For instance, I remember being around 9 or 10 years old in the late 80s and walking down a street in my mostly white neighborhood. As I walked past a woman she clenched her purse, and quickly shifted away from me. She looked spooked, as if she’d seen a ghost, even though it was the middle of a sunny summer day and I was just a little kid. Perhaps she needed to have more interactions with people who didn’t look like her to know that not all of us black people are purse snatchers and even those of that are believe city streets are better places to snatch purses than a mostly white neighborhood in broad daylight.

I relay that story only because we’re all very aware of how racism has affected our world and we’re reminded often by good intentioned but off-base Americans everyday that one of the things we need to do about it is make sure that our schools are diverse. And in so doing, they overrate diversity because the place too much value on skin color.

Let me pose this question to you – is a school with 100 white kids better than a school with 70 white kids, 10 black kids, and 20 Hispanic kids? You’ve got no other information than that to answer the question, so I’d like you to answer it.

If you said yes, you’re wrong. If you said no, you’re wrong too . The answer is – who knows?! Just because a school has ‘diversity’ doesn’t make it better or worse than a school that doesn’t. In fact, lauding diversity the way we have perpetuates much of the now latent racism that still exists today.

If you applaud melanin diversity for the sake of melanin diversity, you’re only doing a skin deep analysis. You’re not talking about the performance of those schools and you could be applauding a school that is ‘diverse’ but performs poorly – hello, Providence. You also teach young people that diversity is something that we should strive for without giving them a reason why. Also, you don’t look at economic diversity, male/female diversity, or any number of other traits that one could review to give a more accurate portrayal of diversity.

And that’s the kicker, no one ever tells you why diversity is a good ideal but only that we should seek it. Well let me make a case for why we need diversity and hopefully do a better job than many well-intentioned people.

We’re in a global economy with many different and differing cultures and if your workforce is made up of a singular minded culture it’s likely that the company will have difficulty interacting and competing on the global stage.

Consumers do like to interact with people that look like them and share similar backgrounds. It’s not as though they’ll refuse to be served by someone who doesn’t, but companies can often gain a competitive advantage by employing a workforce that mirrors the demographics of the marketplace.

Another would-be benefit of diversity is creating an atmosphere where different perspectives bring different ideas. Take someone from Kenya, South Africa, Australia, and Brazil put them in a room and ask them to solve a problem is a different exercise than putting 4 people from Brazil and asking them to solve the same problem. With different backgrounds come different experiences and often those differences lead to different solutions put forth by the different racial/ethnic groups tasked to answer a question. In a homogenous setting the likelihood that one will get a multitude of differing ideas is less likely because of the backgrounds of the people involved. That isn’t to say a homogenous group can’t come up with the ‘right’ answer or that a diverse group will, it’s only to say that within a diverse environment a likely outcome is a thorough discussion of a number of different ideas which could lead to the best idea resulting.

In my opinion, that’s the point behind diversity – serving a global market and creating a culture where a number of ideas are explored to reach the best possible solution. Diversity for the sake of diversity is mindless and should not be lauded on its own.


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Diversity is today's version of affirmative action. Check the right box on an application for a college or a job and you recieve and added "lift". Qualifications are sadly taking a back seat to checking the correct box of origin. Purely optional, of course.

Comment #1 by David Beagle on 2013 02 20

Mr. Roach's article is one of the most fair and balanced I have read on GoLocalProv.

Comment #2 by Ronald Syper on 2013 02 20

I don't often agree with Don, but this time I do. An excellent column this week.

Comment #3 by Peter Cassels on 2013 02 20

I believe diversity is useful in school to counter the stereotypes that exist and allow students to see that people of diverse backgrounds are not that different or scary. Seeing for yourself is a powerful tool. You can read about it, or listen (hopefully) to your parents talk about everyone being equal, etc, but seeing it for yourself really drives that message home. We're all different in some way, but that doesn;t make us any better or worse than anyone else.

Comment #4 by Rob Felber on 2013 02 20

so you are a minority and get special treatment going to aprivate school, then a colege, then your first job....your first promotions

then somewhere along the way, the studentperson of color realizes that they really dotn have the skills that there peer group should have but they are in that league.

so where does that leave them.

and where does it leave the others that lost the spot in privatev school, college, jobs, promotions??????

its a failure.. i have seen it first hand

Comment #5 by jon paycheck on 2013 02 20

Numbers tell us things. And de facto segregation is very much an issue in our times. The concentration of minority students in more impoverished schools thus poses a threat to the quality of education those students will experience. It's consistently reported that there is significant correlation between schools with high poverty rates and those with high minority populations. When these schools are segregated racially and socioeconomically, they often lack the resources necessary to perform well.

So, yes, the exterior color of our students tells us nothing. The concentration of color tells us what's wrong with our society.

Comment #6 by R G on 2013 02 20

I too think Mr Roach made good points. The way our country is today, diversity will usually happen naturally. I think government does have a role, not to promote "mindless" diversity for its own sake, but to enforce anti-discrimination laws (I recall reading about a Wall St Journal experiment matching black-white pairs with equal qualifications in job searches - most of the time treated the same, but the black applicant was 4 times more likely to be discriminated against than the white) and shift some resources to schools and neighborhoods in poverty (whether white or black) where the tax base doesn't support the needs.

Comment #7 by barry schiller on 2013 02 20

Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.