| | Advanced Search

 

RI State Report: Minimum Wage, Woonsocket + Cutting School Days—Busy week on Smith Hill...

In Case You Missed It: Providence Mayor’s Race—The game is heating up...

Travis Rowley: Sheldon Whitehouse: A Radical Embarrassment—It wasn't just about the tornado...

Matt Espeut’s Fit For Life: Fit at Forty—It's better than you think...

The LOOK: Easy Last-Minute Looks—Instant style for long-weekend parties...

Classical Basketball to Move Forward Without Two Stars—Two stars move on...

Who Will Win Division I Boys Lacrosse Championship?—Who will win...

John Rooke - Thinking Out Loud—JR's column on the sports stories and personalities…

Fox’s Rival Calls for New Economic Model—Fox's Rival Calls for New Economic Model

New Legislation Would Raise Taxes On Some Low-Income Housing in RI—Sponsors say they owe their municipality the hard…

 
 

Democrats: Dumbing You Down

Saturday, December 15, 2012

 

Liberals want your brain. And they’re going to enslave it by training you to be as emotionally impulsive as possible.

This week the Wall Street Journal revealed that EngageRI – the leading advocacy group for state pension reform last year – was “financed, in large part, by a Houston billionaire” named John Arnold.

Local progressives pounced on this disclosure as evidence of the illegitimacy of last year’s landmark pension reform. The Providence Journal followed up the WSJ’s article with this front-page headline: “Texas Billionaire Gave To Advocacy Group.”

Within an article titled “The One-Percent and RI’s Pension Overhaul,” RIPR reporter Scott MacKay (while oddly preoccupied over the pricy wine that wealthy people order at restaurants) ridiculed and lamented Arnold’s involvement: “Ok, so now we know the one-percent are intensely interested in Rhode Island pension issues…We hope this Texas billionaire is as worried about his own state’s dismal record in providing health insurance to children as he is with RI pensions. It is bad enough that Texans own our only statewide newspaper. Do they want our government too?”

A man who has left the business sector in order to “focus on philanthropy” and who has “pledged to give away most of [his] fortune of more than $3 billion,” with all of the economic illiteracy a progressive can illustrate Bob Plain of RIFuture.org chose to accuse Arnold of being someone who “[makes] money on the misfortune of others” – an accusation ignorantly based on Arnold’s skill and past success as an investor.

President of Council 94 Michael Downey remarked, “I’m disgusted to see wealthy people from out of state putting money into a crusade to steal retirement security from a janitor who makes $12,000.”

By listening to these people, you might think that Central Falls never collapsed under its own union weight. They still think unions are the only people trying to protect “the workers.” Worse, they’re attempting to have more Rhode Islanders adopt the same delusion.

But it is a simple fact that Downey and his ilk are the ones who “[stole] retirement security” from Central Falls retirees, and that reformers like Raimondo and Arnold are working hard to make sure something like that never happens again.

The Arnolds, who are currently helping the Pew Center offer “free technical support to Rhode Island cities and towns,” are doing the Lord’s work.

Thank God for rich people.

Making Smart People Stupid

But that’s not how progressives see it. And that’s not how they want others to see it either.

Unfortunately, progressives specialize in making smart people stupid. They train people to think with their hearts instead of their heads; to treat truth as a relative reality; to believe facts depend on the messenger – in this case, the messenger’s wealth.

Normal Person: “Two plus two equals four.”

Liberal: “Wait, before I can trust you, I need to know how much money is in your pocket right now!”

By constantly injecting emotion into legitimate controversies (for the most part, with charges of bigotry and greed, and with the temptation of envy) progressives have enabled themselves to bypass penetrating discourse by rendering various political disputes as one all-out war between good and evil. From then on, that’s all people have to know. The world must be saved from Republicans! The world must be saved from the racists! The world must be saved from the one-percent!

Or maybe we just disagree on this one issue, guys. I mean, come on. Can we at least talk about it?

No, you’re a fascist! No War for Oil!

This week in Michigan, while trying to interact with union activists who were protesting right-to-work legislation, Fox News reporter Steven Crowder made a point that has been observed many times before, that leftists “don’t want dialogue.” When actually confronted by someone who seemed interested in debate, Crowder explained, “You don’t believe I have a right to not be in a union. I think that’s wrong.” The man responded, “You would never last in a union. Look at you.”

And now you know why conservative commentators write books titled, “Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder” (Savage).

Crowder would then be stalked by a handful of labor goons, and assaulted with a sucker-punch.

And now you know why conservative commentators write books titled, “How To Talk To a Liberal – If You Must” (Coulter).

Intellectual Dishonesty

Of course, leading leftists are careful not to explicitly make too much of Mr. Arnold’s personal wealth. They just sort of, well, mention it.

Because if they actually did come out and tell everyone what the primary objective is of focusing on the wealth of their political opposition, they wouldn’t be able to admit what it truly is – which is to perpetuate an advantageous falsehood, the notion that the Left is powerless and without billionaire backers of its own.

In place of this intellectual honesty, progressives employ innuendos to make their point, crafting headlines that mention “billionaires” and the “one-percent.” Then they couch their true political strategy – as well as their irrational disdain for the rich – within legitimate concerns, such as “transparency” and “money in politics.” Especially “out of state” money.

The Providence Journal writes that the outing of John Arnold has “touched off a debate about transparency and the role of money in politics.”

No it hasn’t. Progressives don’t really care about these things. Are we to believe that unions – who spend more money each election cycle than both political parties combined – have a problem with “money in politics?” Or that left-wing activists have a problem with “out of state” money influencing local issues? These are the people who just sent millions of dollars in “out of state” cash – as well as “out of state” activists – to Wisconsin and Michigan to assist their unionized “brothers and sisters.”

Transparency? These are the people who don’t want anyone to have to show an ID at the voting booth.

For progressives, this is about never missing an opportunity to brainwash and propagandize the Rhode Island citizenry, to inject more emotion into debates that should be based on math and reason.

Because once the intellect is spoiled, all the progressive puppeteers need to do is point out that a representative from the “one-percent” is involved in the controversy, and the liberal minions – like a mob of monkeys – will understand it as a call to action.

The disclosure of John Arnold’s support of EngageRI simply gave the Rhode Island Left an opportunity to continue their effort to dumb down as many Rhode Islanders as possible – to once again make them disregard the fact that two plus two equals four.

Travis Rowley (TravisRowley.com) is the author of The RI Republican: An Indictment of the Rhode Island Left.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Chris O.

"They train people to think with their hearts instead of their heads;"

So true.

Michael Trenn

Libs love to bewail the input of wealthy conservatives into the political process. They absolutly never talk about, admit, or even think about, all the big-money liberals who provide support to leftisit causes. Ask one of them "How do you spell Soros?", and all you will get is a blank stare. And don't forget about all the "Hollywood Heavies" who turn out in lemming-like throngs to write big checks for their fearless leader.

Mateo C

of course it is being funded by an out-of-stater - there are no billionaires that live here, and nobody that pays taxes in RI can afford anything besides taxes.

i am sure these clowns (Mackay & Downey) were up in arms when Soros started pumping hundreds of millions into liberal causes in order to get Obama into office.

liberal hypocrisy, as usual.

Art West

Multiple sources put Mr. Union, super liberal Michael Moore's fortune at about $50 million. He made his money using capitalist means -- selling movie tickets and books mainly to the oppressed masses. Yet, he's a guy who has publicly denied that he's a one-percenter, and is a man of the people.

That is the kind of astounding hypocrisy that occupies the minds of so many of the progressives/socialists/liberals.

tom brady

Anyone want to take a guess about the subject of next weeks column?

Chris O.

lol...Personally, Tom, I don't think we can be reminded enough of exactly who is ruining this state and country.....and Rowley does it pretty effectively if you ask me.

Vince Wolfork

Loved how you conveniently don't mention where that rich Texan made all his money. Energy trader at Enron, probably rigging the markets all the way to the bank, he probably should be in jail. As you Repubs would save, capitalism at it finest !!!

Real Clear

Liberals want your brain. And they’re going to enslave it....

Thank goodness Travis has our back!

Chris O.

I'm loving this. Vince Wolfork, could you have proven Rowley's point any better?

Normal Person: "The pensions are severely un-funded."

Liberal: "Enron!!!!"

Chris O.

Real Clear, your comment is worthless as well. Simple-minded mockery. Oh look, another liberal deciding not to debate.

Real Clear and Vince Wolfork --- all the evidence Rowley needs.

Vince Wolfork

The pensions are severely un-funded

I agree totally, not sure where in my comment you assumed I didn't.
Just don't buy the canned conservative dogma.

Vince Wolfork

Are we to believe that unions – who spend more money each election cycle than both political parties combined – have a problem with “money in politics?”

Please back this up with some VALID current data. maybe from this election cycle. So much bs.

Vince Wolfork

and who was the biggest spender this election cycle?

Vince Wolfork

Normal Person: The pensions are severely un-funded and most energy traders from Enron should have been prosecuted and put in jail.

Chris O.

Not sure what to say to someone who thinks Enron has anything to do with the topic at hand. Your initial response was classic liberalism, just as Rowley described in this very article.

And the reason someone might think you don't think (or don't care) the pensions are poorly funded is because your argumentative impulse was to entirely ignore that problem, choosing instead to bring up a liberal dog-whistle (Enron). And then you entirely misrepresent the conservative viewpoint by accusing Republicans of believing that financial crimes represent "capitalism at its finest"...

You just can't talk to liberals. This is what you have to go through.

Vince Wolfork

Please help me out, what is the topic on hand?
Poorly funded pensions?

or one of these three?
Democrats: Dumbing You Down
Making Smart People Stupid
Intellectual Dishonesty

Vince Wolfork

Leaving out any historically perspective on that guy is just as disingenuous.

Describing that guy only as a:
A man who has left the business sector in order to “focus on philanthropy” and who has “pledged to give away most of [his] fortune of more than $3 billion.

Look I really don't care who donated what to who, just don't get so one sided. The guy probably has some pluses and minuses, just don't make him out to be some kind of saint.

Vince Wolfork

and I agree liberals do change the subject, but certainly as you seem to be saying is only done by liberals. Conservatives do it all the time also, here is a classic example:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoFfVQPSIOQ

I know, I know she isn't the sharpest pencil in the box, just an example.

Vince Wolfork

Just reread the original posting, how f'ing biased is this Rawley? He seems to believe everything Faux new airs is legit, boggles me.

Quote:
"Crowder would then be stalked by a handful of labor goons, and assaulted with a sucker-punch."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIF70HsfpAg

michael riley

the comments by McKay and Plain reveal the prism through which they view politics and life...who can blame them?...they watch and in fact encourage insider dealing in state politics...they can not conceive of the fact that a philanthropist or a Harvard / oxford grad could believe pension reform is a national priority.....very sad indeed

Michael Byrnes

Vince Wolfork. Your comments on Enron are interesting. You make some big assumptions by stating: “that rich Texan made all his money”; “probably rigging the markets”; and “probably should be in jail”. As you may know several Enron executives rightly went to jail and are still there. Maybe, just maybe, Arnold did not qualify. But no need to give him the benefit of the doubt – he is “rich” or should we say “successful”. I seem to remember that Paul Krugman was a senior adviser to Enron – I don’t think he was one of the “Repubs”.

Gerry Boucher

So the new republican campaign strategy is to call Democrats "stupid"? Thank You Travis

Vince Wolfork

Krugman the noble prize winning economics scholar was probably advising Enron on national and international macro level economic issues, certainly not on the day to day fraudulent micro company issues. What do you mean by "senior advisor"? Need to research what that means, do you have any links for information?

Personally I think all the energy markets are manipulated then and now. Many of them are corrupt and they should be prosecuted. Just google the Libor and recent HSBC scandals, Sandy Weill is spot on here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZ_fvnN9P2Q

Vince Wolfork

found some good info

http://www.salon.com/2002/01/31/enron_pundits/

Vince Wolfork

after reading this Geithner and Holder needed to be fired
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2012/12/the-second-great-betrayal-obama-and-cameron-decide-that-banks-are-above-the-law.html

Hard for me to believe that the MSM is giving this very little attention.




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.