has broken his silence about Curt Schilling’s failed video game company, incumbent lawmakers who voted in favor of the legislation that made it possible to bring 38 Studios to the Ocean State will likely have to explain themselves to voters over the next few weeks, several candidates, Party leaders and taxpayer advocates say." />

| | Advanced Search

 

RI State Report: Made in RI + Tax Incentives to Live Healthier—could you get a break from Uncle Sam…

Travis Rowley: Obama’s Failed Vision of Government—And what this week's lessons hold...

Beauty: 6 Easy Steps To Summer-Worthy Legs—get ready for skirts and shorts

John Rooke - Thinking Out Loud—JR's column on the sports stories and personalities…

Election Preview 2014: Who’s Running for What—Election Preview 2014: Who's Running for What?

Side of the Rhode: Who’s Hot and Who’s Not in RI Politics?—Who's up, who's down?...

5 Great Spring Hikes in RI’s Wildest Places—Get wild in RI's refuges this weekend...

Rhode Island’s Biggest PowerBall Winners—We've all got Powerball fever...

Up Close With Rhode Island Boxer Shelito Vincent—-- the undefeated inspiration

The Cellar: Pinot Noir—Both under $25...

 
 

38 Studios Scandal Could Spell Trouble for Incumbents

Monday, September 17, 2012

 

Now that former Governor Don Carcieri has broken his silence about Curt Schilling’s failed video game company, incumbent lawmakers who voted in favor of the legislation that made it possible to bring 38 Studios to the Ocean State will likely have to explain themselves to voters over the next few weeks, several candidates, Party leaders and taxpayer advocates say.

38 Studios filed for bankruptcy in June less than two years after the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation (EDC) voted to offer the company a $75 million loan guarantee to move its headquarters to the Ocean State from Massachusetts. Court documents show the company was more than $150 million in the red when it filed for bankruptcy, with the state owed $115.9 million.

But critics say the deal never would have happened if the General Assembly didn’t jam through last-minute legislation that helped expand the EDC’s Job Creation Guaranty Program from $50 million to $125 million, the exact amount that would eventually be awarded to Schilling’s company.

“The collapse of 38 Studios and the roughly $100 million tab it left on the doorstep of the RI taxpayer should make it a central voter concern in these weeks leading up to the election,” said Donna Perry, executive director of the Rhode Island Statewide Coalition (RISC). “Candidates need to know voters are angry that legislators green lighted that loan without demanding a fuller accounting of what that legislation really meant.”

Voters Make Statement with Brien

Perry said there have been several other instances where the EDC has doled out millions of dollars without much success, but the high-profile nature of 38 Studios has caught voters’ attention.

“The taxpayers need to tell candidates that if they won’t take a hard line and force greater scrutiny, smaller scale loans, and less political interference in the process, then they aren’t working in the taxpayers’ best interests and that will be remembered in November,” Perry said.

In one case, voters have already made a statement.

Last week, Woonsocket State Rep. Jon Brien, who co-sponsored the legislation with former finance committee chairman Steven Costantino and current finance committee chairman Helio Melo, was defeated in a Democratic primary by challenger Stephen Casey.

Casey supporters say the victory came in part thanks to a SEIU mailer sent to likely primary voters that tied Brien to 38 Studios the week before the election.

“Rep. Brien was one of three sponsors whose names appeared on the law that enabled the EDC to loan $75 million to Curt Schilling’s risky video game company – but left Rhode Islanders on the hook when it failed,” said Chas Walker, an elected organizer with the SEIU. “Brien later claimed that the wool had been pulled over his eyes, that he was sold a bill of goods, and that he didn’t know that all of the funds would be poured into one company – but it appears these excuses simply weren’t good enough for voters.”

GOP Leader: Republicans were “Powerless”

According to State GOP Chairman Mark Zaccaria, a more balanced legislature might have led to more debate and deliberation on the issue, but instead the legislation was pushed through too late and with zero mention of 38 Studios. While former House Minority Leader Robert Watson cast the lone vote against the bill, Zaccaria said Republicans were essentially “powerless to do anything to stop it” from passing.

“The real problem, however, is that the Speaker can deliver legislation to the floor of the chamber – fully formed and completely un-vetted – and have it passed within minutes,” Zaccaria said. “That deprives the citizens of any representation in the matter as their elected officials have no more idea about such bills than we constituents do, at home in our beds when it all goes down. Until that changes the specter of another 38 Studios, or worse, looms over Little Rhody.”

Mark Binder, an independent candidate who is running against House Speaker Gordon Fox in District 4, agreed with Zaccaria. Binder says the 38 Studios failure is what motivated him to run in the first place and criticized Fox for continuing to promote the legislation on his campaign website.

“38 Studios is a prime and expensive example of what is wrong with Rhode Island's state government,” Binder said.

Fox Spokesman: Job Development a ‘Major Focus’

Binder believes Fox still hasn’t answered why legislation that had been “languishing in committee” for several years finally passed in 2010. He suggested that the Speaker’s friendship with Michael Corso, a tax credit broker and lawyer who worked for 38 Studios, is what helped the deal move forward.

“When 38 Studios imploded, Gordon Fox did what he always does. He ducked the questions and denied responsibility,” he said.

But the political ramifications of the 38 Studios deal aren’t what the Speaker is thinking about, according to Fox’s spokesman Larry Berman.

“Speaker Fox is less concerned that 38 Studios is a campaign issue, and much more concerned about the jobs that were lost and the risk to the taxpayers which resulted from the closure of the company,” Berman said. “We were facing extremely high unemployment numbers in 2010, so the General Assembly created a program to address the difficult times. We learned many lessons from the failure of the company, but the premise of creating job opportunities is still valid. Job development will continue to be a major focus of the General Assembly in the next session.”

For Zaccaria, it all comes down to a need for more oversight.

“I’d say that the General Assembly owes it to the citizens of Rhode Island to establish a more transparent process than the very murky one used to fund 38 Studios,” he said.

 

Dan McGowan can be reached at dmcgowan@golocalprov.com. Follow him on Twitter: @danmcgowan.

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Joel Hovanesian

One only needs to read Rep. Spencer Dickensons letter,(below)to understand what is wrong with the political situation here in RI.

VOTE THE INS...OUT! RE-ELECT.....NOBODY!
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7uLVN58PNIdd1RHU0RZczc4RWc/edit?pli=1

David Allen

Unfortunately, Rhode Islanders are either too dumb to make the connection or too lazy to care. Undoubtedly, the lazy voting body will walk into the booth and elect the same old group of people that have left us in this mess - no thinking, just pull on the "D".

The Democrats have given us Martineau, Irons, Ruggerio, Montalbano, Celona, Medina, and more. Yet, their leadership (Paiva-Weed and Fox) , the puppeteers that continue to make self-serving decisions, without debate, challenge or opportunity to be heard, will continue to ruin this once great State.

No parity in the GA, no chance of coming out of this any time soon. We are dommed if RI voters keep doing what they have always done. Doomed.

dis gusted

Title of thios article is
"38 Studios could spell trouble for incumbents."

The RI taxpayers should be thinking instead:
38 Studios WILL SPELL TROUBLE FOR INCUMBENTS
and throw them all out on November 6th...
There is no one running against Helio Melo and that's too bad that the opponent he had dropped out. He needs to go. The Gen Assembly needs new faces and new lawmakers...Helio Melo was also part of this tricky triad throwing RI taxpayers underer the bus. Steve
Constantino got himself another job working in the Chafee administration and Jon Brein fortunately got thrown out last week. The Woonsocket people were intelligent enough to vote him out...Now Helio Melo, the chief architect of the past budget needs to go as well. He knew what was going on with 38 Studios.
He and his buddy Gordon Fox knew as well as Senate president Paiva-Weed and Majority leader Nick Mattiello...they all knew and they all voted for 38 Studios. They all need to be voted out in November. However they have a loyal group of blind followers who will vote them in again. This is why we need term limits...to stop the accumulation of power and control these law makers have when they are in the General ASSembly for years.
The RI voters will not push that lever and vote for the opponent of these people. And the reason is that these politicians control a majority of their voters with FAVORS...Why else would you vote for a person who screwed you with a terrible budget and putting you as a taxpayer on the hook for over a hundred million dollars due to the collapse of 38 Studios? And the rest of the people are too lazy to vote. They figure they cannot make a difference.
Today there is a recount for 7 RI elections....THEY CAN make a difference. On Nov 6th, grow some guts and vote for the opposite of your incumbent. Don't vote for Gordon Fox. Vote for his opponent, Independent Mark Binder. Say to yourself...what has Gordon Fox done for you?
Do the same for those in Newport in the Paiva Weed district. Vote her out. She even screwed business people with her tourist tax that she took away this year.
Vote out Mattiello in Cranston's District 15. Say to yourself, what has he done for you? He is ineffective...Phenix Lodge is a plan that will go through in that district despite the outcry of constituents...Vote out the incumbents. For once in your life, pull the lever opposite the incumbent. The sky won't fall down if you make that change in your secret ballot vote. This state is not getting any better. Joblessness and home sale are terrible...The economy is awful What can you do to change this? VOTE OUT INCUMBENTS

Art West

dis gusted has it right. The GA leadership, essentially Fox and Paiva-Weed, run the entire RI Show, and get bills passed that they favor virtually without comment or input. The rest of the reps and senators know they have to just vote the way the leadership tells them to -- or they won't advance in their political careers. It's not that different from a Mafia organization.

Voters cannot go wrong summoning some inner strength, rejecting old habits, and voting out the incumbents.

Captain Blacksocks

If all the thinking voters in RI try to convince just ONE friend or neighbor to STOP voting for the same old band of thieves, then that might just be enough to change things in RI. Ask you friends who they are voting for. If it's a "D", ask them WHY and see if you can sway them. Have they even thought about it? 70 years of D domination has this state in wreck. Time to try a new flavor.

Howard Miller

three balls two strikes the bases loaded strike three you are out

Joyce Bryant

The DEMS in the GA have an excuse, they will blame it all on Carcieri and the idiot voters will vote the same old band of thieves back in again. NO CHANGE. SAME CORRUPT POLS, AND THE R.I. BEAT GOES ON....

Harold Stassen

Good luck to Mr. Binder, who is attempting to unseat the ethically challenged Speaker Fox. Mr. Fox's close personal relationship with tax credit broker Michael Corso should be more than enough for voters in that District to oust the Speaker. Unfortunately, the East Side liberalista's will most likely ignore another in a long line of Fox transgressions and return him to the State House to do more damage.

vin coia

fox and corso belong in prison .
but, that aside fox will be reelected and remain the screeching, pouting during any opposition speaker .
paiva weed also .

dis gusted

we cannot assume such things...We need to reach out to those who think Paiva Weed and Fox are the best thing since sliced bread..We need to support those running against the incymbents and the leadership.
We must talk to neighbors, acquaintenances and ask them if they feel Fox and PAiva Weed are representing the taxpayers..We need to get those who don't vote, to actually vote in November, and to vote against those who are in there..
P/R is so crucial.There ought to be a mantra..an expression,something that the general public can hear over and over to make them think twice about putting back in office the same ineffective lawmakers.
The people who read this column are not the problem. It is the people who don't read this blog, who don't read anything on the Internet and who don't care that can make the difference. The incumbents apparently have a loyal following...probably because they get favors done by these politicians...People only vote for someone of they get something out of them...But if we can get a whole new group...those who don't vote, to vote these incumbents out, then RI might have a chance to survive the recession.

Jack Brophy

Let's see:
1) Every VC in the greater Boston area gave Schilling the "Heisman" when he went calling on them
2) No real investor in the venture community would provide $75M in any form to a start-up (which, 38 essentially was)...money goes in in dribs/drabs and has milestones to hurdle before getting more
3) VCs would own a substantial chunk of any company they invested in (not so here!)
4) True investors would not handcuff a startup (or any company) with the caveat that they HAD to hire a certain number of employees in order to get money....that creates a high burn rate that ultimately eats away at the cash position of a company, particularly nascent firms who don't generate cash..they burn it
5) A real investment entity would not pour all (or almost all) of its capital into ONE firm. That's just downright stupid. Venture firms play the numbers game, expecting a distribution of wine/losses - oftentimes looking like a normal distribution curve (depending on the stage of investments)
6) At the very least, all the EDC had to do was simply call the State's head of investments (in the Treasurer's office) and ask them to check with either a) some of the venture firms they've invested into or b) talk w their consultants who advise them on investing. Either one of those contact points would have yielded a connection for the State to bounce questions off of people who actually KNOW what they're doing...and guess what? Despite KNOWING what they're doing, they have a finite "hit" rate on deals! The EDC knew nothing about these simple facts...they should not be investing into areas that are not their expertise.




Write your comment...

You must be logged in to post comments.