| | Advanced Search

 

Tee Times For CVS/Caremark Charity Classic—pros tee off Monday morning after clinic

Boston Strong! B’s Win Game 3—take 2-1 lead in Stanley Cup Finals

Rhode Island’s Best Communities 2013: #39 to #30—The 4th annual analysis of RI's 39 cities…

CITY/STATE: What Makes A Great Community?—What do the numbers tell us, and what…

Rhode Island #1 State Where People Hate Going To Work—RI has a case of the Mondays every…

Foster #30: RI’s Best Communities 2013—Cast your vote for the best thing about…

Burrillville #31: RI’s Best Communities 2013—Cast your vote for the best thing about…

Warren #32: RI’s Best Communities 2013—Cast your vote for the best thing about…

East Providence #33: RI’s Best Communities 2013—Cast your vote for the best thing about…

West Warwick #34: RI’s Best Communities 2013—Cast your vote for the best thing about…

 
 

The Highest Car Taxes In Rhode Island

Monday, September 19, 2011

 

As residents in some municipalities continue to rail against the lowering of car tax exemptions, Rhode Island’s poorest cities and towns are also charging their residents the highest car tax rates, a statewide review of municipal finances shows.

Leading the way is Providence, which is charging $60 per $1,000 in assessed value, by far the highest in the state. The capital city, which came under fire last week as protesters gathered on the steps of City Hall to criticize a budget change that lowered the car tax exemption from $6,000 to $1,000, has a car tax rate more than six times higher than New Shoreham, which has the lowest rate in the state.

Also near the top of taxing mountain are Pawtucket ($53.30), Central Falls ($48.65) and Woonsocket ($46.58), three municipalities that have been forced to rely on tax increases over the past decade as their financial situations have continued to deteriorate. Central Falls filed for bankruptcy last month and Pawtucket and Woonsocket have each been forced to borrow money simply to make payroll in recent years.

Cranston, Barrington, North Providence, Johnston and Burrillville are the other cities and towns charging at least $40 per $1,000 in assessed value in Rhode Island.

High Taxes/Low Exemptions

In addition to the high rates, more residents are being asked to pay taxes on their cars thanks to changes made to the exemption law in 2010. As part of last year’s state budget adopted by the General Assembly and signed by the governor, the state did away with the $6,000 auto excise tax exemption that was uniformly administered by all cities and towns. Under that exemption, anyone owning an auto that was worth less than $6,000 did not have to pay excise tax on the vehicle; those with vehicles valued higher than $6,000 were taxed by their communities on the amount over that threshold.

According to figures provided by the RI Division of Municipal Finance in the Department of Revenue, eight communities have maintained the $6,000 excise tax exemption, while 18 have lowered it to $500. The remainder of the communities have lowered the exemption to a point in between, such as $3,000 or $1,500.

Providence actually lowered its tax by more than $16 for 2012, but the city broadened its base by reducing the exemption to $1,000. During a rally held last Thursday, former City Council candidate Hamlet Miguel Lopez said the high taxes are forcing residents to make difficult choices.

“A lot of people are upset right now,” Lopez said. “People are choosing between a plate of food or paying their rent and now they’re having to pay more in car taxes.”

State Senator Wants To Raise Exemptions

At least one State Senator is calling for changes to be made for next year. State Senator James Sheehan said understands the need for cities and towns raise more revenue, but that now isn’t the right time be increasing the tax burden on residents.

Sheehan is proposing a middle ground where the minimum car tax exemption is raised from $500 to $3,500.

“Many community residents who have received their auto tax bills this year have seen a significant hike in what they owe. Some auto owners who paid no tax last year are facing a tax bill this year,” Sheehan said. “It is hard to fault cities and towns for doing this, since they are all facing their own financial problems. But this is just a horrible time to be adding to the tax burden of our residents, especially in those communities that have decided to set the exemption at its lowest allowable point of $500.”

Sheehan called the $500 exemption “just too low.”

“In light of the pressure this tax has placed on working class Rhode Islanders, the state needs to take action,” said Senator Sheehan. “Allowing cities and towns to lower the exemption from $6,000 to $500 is just too enormous a change all at once. The $500 exemption threshold is just too low.”

Hurting Those Who Can Least Afford It

Another State Senator also raised concerns over car taxes during the last General Assembly session. Sen. Frank Lombardo III proposed legislation that would have allowed anyone who receives Social Security retirement benefits or who is disabled and who meets certain income and net worth levels to receive a municipal exemption of $6,000 on the excise tax on their motor vehicles. The bill did not pass.

“As is usually the case, those who are hurt the most are those who can least afford to pay more,” Lombardo said. “It’s hard enough for working people to have to pay more. Seniors living on fixed incomes and disabled citizens suddenly have another harsh decision to make – do they give up food or medicine to pay this new higher bill.”

At the time, Lombardo said he understood the situation cities and towns were in, but he also argued that the most vulnerable residents should be protected.

“I realize the difficult economic situation of the state and also of most of its citizens, and I understand that there needs to be shared sacrifice,” said Senator Lombardo. “But I would make an exception for retirees and the disabled who are at a certain economic level. They are already vulnerable and the enactment of this legislation could make them a little less so.”


 

If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.

 

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Buc Kner

SUPPORT SENATOR LOMBARDO !!

happy harry101

Wake up Pawtucket residents this is the New direction Grebien promised......higher and higher taxes

John Peters

A bill to give Social Security recipients and retirees a 6K exemption?? No way!! I'm tired of working my butt off supporting everyon else. Eventually we are going to have a new class of poor folk the "working poor". Give Social Security(which I pay, but wont be avaialble when I retire) and retriees a bus pass! If you have to have special tax breaks so you can afford a car, perhaps you should not have one!! I need my car to drive to work(and pay taxes)yet had to scronge and save to pay my taxes.

Enough of this welfare state we live in!!!! How about a discount for those of us who work??

Peter Cassels

Boy, you folks who don't favor an exemption for retirees are a real bunch of selfish people. We worked all our lives and you still want us to pay through the nose. I get just about NOTHING for the property taxes I pay.

ed curtis

What happened to the Democrats mandated "Obozo Shared Sacrifice" mantra?

NO EXEMPTIONS

*

John Peters

No Mr. Cassels, its not me being selfish, its me sick of working OT, and still having to scronge money to go on a date. Its the fact that I cant afford to go on vactation this year yet 25 % of my pay is going to taxes. All the while all the retirees are on busses to Foxwoods to gamble away what I pay. If retirees and Social Security recipients are so hard up that they cant pay auto tax, perhaps they do not belong at Foxwoods. Enough is enough!!!!!!!!!

anthony sionni

.I think this car tax should ultimately be repealed all together. The state is raking in tons of money from automobiles. When someone buys a new auto they pay thousands of dollars in sales tax,then the car is taxed over and over in sales tax on the same car every time its sold to another person. The state also collects transfer of registration fees and in some cases new registration fees, then there getting money from us from inspecting the cars every two years, registration renewals every two years, license renewal every five years. Enough is enough, what are they doing with all this money.

Under the current tax system in place,its obvious that the valuations are off the chart and that seems to be one of the biggest problems.The state is using N.A.D.A. for the valuations and doesn't allow for mileage or wear and tear of the vehicle to be taken in consideration.People are getting tax bills for clunker cars that are way over valued. I don't advocate that people with older cars pay no tax at all under this current system.

In Providence the tax rate was lowered and the exemption decreased sort of the bate and switch. If you own a more expensive car lets say around twenty thousand,under the tax formula you will pay less in tax increases than someone who has an older car. The amount a tax the person with the older car is paying is in some cases is three times the amount of the increase for a car around twenty thousand, even though the person with the more expensive car is overall paying more in car taxes do to the higher value of the car.

I agree with state Senator Sheehan, they dropped the tax exemption to low all at once. People are struggling all over the state,especially here in Providence to drop the exemption to a $1000 .That was one of the reasons why I organized the protest in Providence. People were shocked at the first time bills and the valuations of the cars. "Another State Senator also raised concerns over car taxes during the last General Assembly session. Sen. Frank Lombardo III proposed legislation that would have allowed anyone who receives Social Security retirement benefits or who is disabled and who meets certain income and net worth levels to receive a municipal exemption of $6,000 on the excise tax on their motor vehicles. The bill did not pass" I also agree with with Senator Lombardo, the elderly and disabled are just about squeaking by. I would like to get the list of all those who didn't vote for that bill, I will paste there face on fliers and pass them around
.

guy smily

Car taxes = taxes = RI Democrats. Vote them all out!

Lance Chappell

The masses are complaining but the municipalities continue to refuse to cut spending. For taxpayers, it comes down to whether to continue paying these outrageous taxes or getting together in masses and protest. Perhaps rallying the legislature to revoke the levy on cars altogether is the answer. People have to start warming up the phones of their legislators and "give them hell" over this.
The valuation numbers are bogus to begin with. Prices on everything have fallen in the dumpster. If the legislature thinks these vehicles are so valuable, then buy them from us. Otherwise, you are running a numbers racket!

Lance Chappell

Oh, and don't buy Sheehan's garbage. He was right in there with the rest of the tax and spend liberals to lower the exemption. Democrats are death for taxpayers. They will spend you into the poor house. Vote these people out once and for all before you lose everything!

Peter Cassels

Mr. Peters, I don't go to Foxwoods. Gambling is a big waste of time and money.

Gary Arnold

Ever think of cutting expenses in the cities and towns?
Mostly give lip service, just look at the payrolls in the cities and towns, nothing has decreased, in fact many got raises. We are taxing the majority for the privileged few who work for the state and municipalities.
I know my budget has decreased and my taxes in North Providence have gone up for real estate and cars. The mayor just authorized the purchase of a $750,000 ladder truck for the fire dept and a $45,000 tractor for the municipal works, all of the teachers and most of the administration got raises, let me see, who did I leave out? The tax payers, they got a raise too, in taxes.
Just one of the worst run towns in the state of RI.

John Waddington

Why is it greedy to want to keep what you earn but its not greedy to want to take what someone else earns ?

The problem is we have more government than we can afford. It's time to cut the size of it in half.

This is a 100 % democrat created problem. You cannot blame anyone else.

Michael Gardiner

Two times the GA has claimed it hasn't raises taxes and then it shows up in the car tax bill. It makes the poorest cities poorer because they are filthy, their parking lots filled with oil and fluid from old barely inspected vehicles. Their residents can't go lease a clean reliable efficient vehicle under warranty, that would help their household budget, because the attractive lease payment is substantially increased by the high car tax. So they are in a fluid leaking clunker instead. We must make cuts where we can and fund government with a lower broader sales tax collected at the cash registers. We make heroes out of protesters and their involvement and interest is laudable. But the heroes we need are those who can identify the spending cuts we can make, and those who have the guts to help re-structure the way in which we raise revenue. We need a broader lower sales tax.

C B11

I would have no problem giving exemptions to those retired and living on Social Security. What bothers me in the article is the "or who is disabled and who meets certain income and net worth levels" - that translates to me to mean Welfare recipients - the majority of which drive nicer and newer cars than most of us hard working stiffs! I would love to drive something newer than my 1997 vehicle, but between the cost of a new car and the amount of taxes I would have to pay on it now, I think I'll just be happy with my ole POS!

ed curtis

Everyone has to pay their fair share. It's not like the "under $5000" cars use less road than a $50K vehicle.

You want to own a car and drive on the roads, PAY your damned taxes.

NO EXEMPTIONS

*

Peter Cassels

It's nice to see that Mr. Curtis and others have such concern for senior citizens.

ed curtis

It's nice to see Peter has no idea of who "is" a senior citizen. What next? The race card?

What part of *FAIR* do you liberals not understand?

*

Peter Cassels

Mr. Curtis, I do know what a senior citizen is. Do you think I am as dumb as you are? A senior citizen is someone who is 65 years or older. Some stores give senior discounts to those who are at least 60. I worked all my life for the benefits I recieve and no one, especially morons like you, will take that away from me!

John Peters

Mr. Cassels, Perhaps you dont go to Foxwoods, but there are many other Seniors who do. In fact I beleive the Pawtucket Housing Authority has trips by the busload to Foxwoods. I dont think that anyoe is talking about taking any benefits away from you or other Seniors, I'm against giving additional benefits. In the current economy its not prudent

ed curtis

Peter,

Please inform the world - "Who gave you these entitlements?" Where is the written law that at a certain point in your life, you are no to follow the rules the rest of the world has to abide by?

Your comments prove to everyone, there are some "seasoned citizens" who have the misguided idea that other people owe you something.

Got some bad news for you Peter, no one owns you a damned thing. If these companies *choose* to give discounts, fine but NO ONE should be forced to do this. Especially at the expense of other tax payers.

*

Peter Cassels

I doubt you jerks will be singing the same tune when you reach retirement age, if you're lucky enough to live so long!

John Peters

I would be ashamed of myself if I did not plan accordingly and needed to depend upon the generosity of taxpayers and corporate America to take care of me.

Again though this article was not about taking away from Senior Citizens it was about giving more entitlements to Seniors. I dont feel anthing should be taken away from you, you just dont need more of my hard earned income.

ed curtis

Hey Peter - Already there and I don't sit around with my hand out, begging for discounts or tax breaks.

Again - you are NOT entitled to a damned thing. If you are looking for a government hand out in your later years, you will be sadly disappointed. Especially in a highly Democrat ruled state. The government couldn't even run a whore house the right way.

I'm self sufficient and rely only on myself and my family. Try it. It will help with your self-esteem issues.

*

Peter Cassels

Mr. Curtis, I have no self-esteem issues. I receive Social Security and a private corporate pension. I also continue to work part-time freelancing and receive rental income from being a landlord.

John Waddington

wa wa wa I f#&í up my life and no one will pay my bills

zan nordlund

XXXXXWhat's wrong with a FLAT car tax? (Lots of states have them). Average it out...everyone would then be paying around $30. This is just a lot of accounting for nothing in such a small StateXXXXX




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.