| | Advanced Search

 

URI’s Mazze on Economic Forecast: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back—URI's Mazze on Economic Forecast: Two Steps Forward,…

Report: Gist Misses Most Achievement Gap Target Numbers—see where the schools are falling short

NEW: Taveras Issues Letter Opposing RI NECAP Requirements—Letter to Senate Education Committee and Board of…

Up Close With Midday Records’ Davey Moore—Fonder of the Midday Social...

NEW: Red Sox Legend Jim Rice at Alex + Ani Charity Event Tonight—Charmed by Charity event...

Lisa Blais: Providence Goes After Water, Homeowners To Fix Budget—A tale of political manipulation...

Women & Infants: 8 Tips For Healthy Exercise When Pregnant—Be healthy and be safe...

RI Small Business Journal + Pat Paolino Cruz Join Forces—Relaunch of New England WOMAN Magazine...

R.I. Basketball Star Charles Correa of St. Ray’s Commits to Dean—Basketball star commits to college...

MUSIC: Bernie Worrell Orchestra—Rock Royalty in Westerly—Rocking the house in South County...

 
 

Special Interest Spending Tops $1 Million in Rhode Island

Monday, October 15, 2012

 

Political Action Committees (PACs) run by unions, corporations, law firms and others groups have already spent nearly $1.2 million in 2012, with a significant chunk of those funds going directly into the campaign accounts of candidates and elected officials, according to a GoLocalProv review of campaign finance reports.

All told, the 243 active PACs in the state have combined to spend $1,196,289.64 this year, with more than half of that money coming from just 20 groups, including the National Education Association (NEA), the Rhode Island Realtors PAC and both the House and Senate Leaderships PACs.

So why are these groups spending so much? Influence, of course.

“They donate with that in mind,” Rhode Island College Political Science Professor Dr. Kay Israel told GoLocalProv earlier this year. “Candidates are smart enough to know which way the wind (or more accurately the money) is blowing and seek donations from sources that would find their potential votes in line with those sought by the funders.”

Biggest Expenses: Donations, Consultants, Food

Of the top 20 spenders, 11 are union-backed PACs, three are run by elected officials and six were formed by groups in the private sector. Records show the top 20 PACs have combined to spend $606,685.90 in 2012.

They include:

The NEA’s PAC leads the way in spending with $79,459.78 between Jan. 1 and last week, with most of its funds going toward consultants, political campaigns and rent and utilities. Records show the PAC spent $16,744 with Checkmate Consulting, the East Greenwich-based firm run by Brad Dufault. The NEA also made max-out $1,000 contributions to legislative candidates Gregg Amore, Mike Morin, Adam Satchell, Dave Gorman, Rep. Spencer Dickinson, Lew Pryeor and Stephen Casey leading up their Democratic primaries. Records show the group also paid $2,500 to advertise on the Rhode Island’s Future blog.

The Rhode Island Laborer’s Political League is second on the list at $68,441.81. The PAC’s largest expense was a $5,000 contribution made on Oct. 5 to the state Democratic Party. The group also made $1,000 contributions to Congressman James Langevin, Senate President M. Teresa Paiva Weed, Senate Majority Leader Dominick Ruggerio, Senator Frank Ciccone and State Rep. candidate John Lombardi.

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) union has spent $39,904.99, including $1,666.67 per month on consulting payments to Paul MacDonald, the President of the Providence Central Labor Council. The IBEW also contributed $500 to Johnston Mayor Joseph Polisena, Rep. candidate Scott Pollard and Cumberland School Committee candidate Craig Duffy.

The largest expense for the Senate Leadership PAC, which has spent $39,411.61 overall, was a $7,566.16 payment made to the McGrath Clambakes catering company in July. The PAC also spent at least $2,000 at Venda Ravioli, Camille's and Mediterraneo on Federal Hill as well as $5,000 on consulting with Fleming & Associates.

The Realtors PAC has spent $31,831.66 throughout the year, with more than a third of those funds going to the National Association of Realtors in Chicago. The PAC also made at least $500 in contributions to Rep. Brian Patrick Kennedy, Rep. Helio Melo, Rep. Nick Mattiello, Providence Mayor Angel Taveras, Attorney General Peter Kilmartin and Congressman Langevin.

Records show the AFL-CIO PAC has spent $29,440.35, including more than $5,000 with Stones’ Phones, one of the top Democratic consulting firms in the country. The PAC also donated at least $500 to Congressman Langevin, Rep. Deborah Fellela, Rep. Scott Guthrie and State Senate candidate Gayle Goldin. More than 20 others lawmakers and candidates have also received small contributions from the PAC this year.

House Speaker Gordon Fox’s House Leadership PAC spent $28,738.17, with its largest payment ($5,000) going to the state Democratic Party. The PAC also spent over $4,600 at Venda Ravioli, $1,000 at the Providence Marriot and $1,000 with the Hamilton Group, a fundraising firm run by Peter Baptista and Nick Hemond. A week before the Democratic primary, the PAC also gave $500 each to Michelle Bergin, Kathy Fogarty and Mia Ackerman, three Rep. candidates running against sitting Democrats (only Ackerman was successful).

The rest of the top ten includes the RI Dental PAC, the Correctional Officers PAC and the International Union of Operating Engineers, all of which have spent at least $24,950 in 2012.

Too Influential?

Because it’s an election year, the state’s PACs are likely to easily surpass the $1.5 million they spent in 2011. And while Super PACs –groups which have the ability to spend limitless amounts of money with very little disclosure— have yet to make an appearance in the Ocean State, Israel said the local PACs still have plenty of influence.

“So, yes, PACs play too large a role, but the issue often is the cost of running for office at all levels and staying there,” Israel said. “For many officeholders government has become an occupation and not a service with the price of admission reduced to seeking and listening to those who can most easily afford to be heard. It may not be as expensive in Rhode Island, but the situation is the same.”

Rhode Island Tea Party President Susan Wynne agrees with Israel. In an interview last spring, Wynne said the PACs –particularly union-backed PACs— play a “major role in funding political campaigns.”

“In a heavily unionized state such as RI, the resources available from Union PACs to their selected candidates has been substantial and has allowed their candidates to wage formidable campaigns,” she said. “Many believe this has created an uneven playing field as well as had significant effect on election outcomes.”

 

Dan McGowan can be reached at dmcgowan@golocalprov.com. Follow him on Twitter: @danmcgowan.

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Malachi Constant

Now, do the real story and write about how PACS are just the tip of the iceberg. Please note how ENGAGERI didn't have to report anything, yet played an active role in the election.

Hey tea party, that union guy is stealing your cookies....

pearl fanch

AKA buying off their politicians.

The only people who could ever stop this corruption, would be the politicians who are receiving this money, and obviously that will never happen.

Ok people, so when does the revolution begin?

Gary Arnold

One way to beat the money, independent thinking people can vote for the best candidate based on their performance, it's that simple.
Get off the couch and vote without pulling the straight vote, it's the best person that will change RI from a bottom feeder.

Pam Thomas

Is engageri still in existence? If so, low profile.

ella mentry

Yes, I was about to mention the fact that the cowards who hide behind Engage RI are those wealthy types who don't want the voters to know who they are,,,,
And YES they are in existence...and behind the scenes will do a lot of damage..
They learned their lesson when Crossroads President Anne Nolan donated to their engage ri cause which was broadcast allover the media and now there is no transparency at all.
Engage RI is one of the 503c tax exempt organizations that are not supposed to influence politics....hahahahaha what a laugh...the wealthy corporate type person behind this anti uniton, anti teacher organization is afraid to be seen or have his/her name published...
a true coward group

ella mentry

Yes, I was about to mention the fact that the cowards who hide behind Engage RI are those wealthy types who don't want the voters to know who they are,,,,
And YES they are in existence...and behind the scenes will do a lot of damage..
They learned their lesson when Crossroads President Anne Nolan donated to their engage ri cause which was broadcast allover the media and now there is no transparency at all.
Engage RI is one of the 503c tax exempt organizations that are not supposed to influence politics....hahahahaha what a laugh...the wealthy corporate type person behind this anti uniton, anti teacher organization is afraid to be seen or have his/her name published...
a true coward group

ella mentry

PS
I wonder hypothetically, if there were term limits by referendum that these super Pacvs would not be spending such huge amounts of money...
We need term limits by referendum. The time has come for the public to demand it. No way will politicians vote to limit their power and control in the Gen ASSembly! That's why they spend thousands and thousands to get the $14,000 job! Notice the lawyers who are in the top leadership positions making 6 figures, unlike many Rhode islanders who want that state house three day a week half a year job)
If the terms were limited, would the SuperPacs still continue to invest such huge amounts? Hmmmmmm I wonder....

Dan McGowan

Thanks for commenting, everyone. Engage RI's PAC was counted, but it is not close to the top 20 in spending (7,671.70 as of June 30). I'd expect that number to grow and you're absolutely right that there are other outside influences I should look at for future stories as well.

Best,
Dan

Samuel Bell

What about Twin River? I know they didn't support any candidates explicitly, but they've still spent a gargantuan amount of money.

Russ Hryzan

Public sector union greed has destroyed this state, and their buying off of elections is obviously still well underway in this election cycle when you look at the top spenders in this race. They will do anything and stop at nothing to continue their legalized extortion scheme/protection racket, and we need Right To Work laws more than ever in this state so we can rid our state of public sector union control of state and municipal spending and return that control to the taxpaying citizens. EngageRI was a valid and necessary cause to right the direction of the underfunded and failing pension system. It was an effort backed by some of the most competent and successful business minds in the area, with the broad-based support of most of the general population of this state. They didn't go far enough, however - that entire pension system should have been ramped down and eliminated so no taxpayer would ever be put on the hook for the benefits of former employees who are no longer working for the taxpayers.

Dan McGowan

Sam,

Twin River's PAC is also included. They have spent just over $7,700 this year.

The jobs for ri campaign has spent millions and we've covered that in recent months as well (http://www.golocalprov.com/news/twin-river-table-games-campaign-spending-tops-2-million/).

Thanks,
Dan
dmcgowan@golocalprov.com

Howard Miller

and down the stretch they come

Samuel Bell

Thanks Dan!

I didn't know Twin River had a PAC as well. My point, though, was that the Jobs for RI campaign spent a vast sum, and leaving it out drastically understates the amount of special interest spending in Rhode Island. I assume it's organized as a c4, but it's still spending. I also think it's a bit deceptive to say there are no superPACs in Rhode Island. While that's technically true, we are still seeing a massive wave of corporate spending on our elections that would have been illegal before Citizens United. The fact that corporations use c4s instead of superPACs doesn't really change anything.

Indeed, leaving out outside spending through c4s also really understates the amount of spending on legislative races. Some races, such as Casey-Brien in Woonsocket, were dominated by outside spending.

Wuggly Ump

"Special Interest" Everyone with an opinion or issue important to them is a "Special Interest".

Gary Arnold hit the nail on the head. Voters have to be independent educated thinkers voting for the candidate that will do what's right, protecting the individual citizen's rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Good luck with that.

Charles Marsh

RI is rightly named “the sewer of politics”. No doubt the average RI voter, and I readily admit I used to be one, is numb to the ingrained political corruption in our state. At best most RI politicians just go along to get along (except a rare individual like Rod Driver) and at worst are self-serving, greedy and morally bankrupt. The “special interest” lobbyists who bribe RI politicians with so called “campaign contributions” are betting that the voters will be hypnotized by their well-funded publicity campaigns to further their selfish agenda. And RI politicians think we are beyond gullible, and will believe most anything we are told. The endgame for this corrupt alliance is self-serving and they are betting that big money will trump the truth. Thanks to real reporters like those at GoLocalProv, the public is now awaking to the reality of RI’s corrupt political alliances. Now the voters are awake there is only one solution; vote out all incumbents. Send a loud and clear message that our kids and families will no suffer because of RI’s political corruption and greedy special interests groups.

Chris Sands

Vote out all incumbents.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.