Cranston School District says that a prior drug conviction should bar someone from volunteering in a school. But the Rhode Island ACLU argues that this policy discriminates against parents like Jessica Gianfrocco—a former heroin addict who has been drug free for six years. ... Join the discussion and vote in our poll." />

Welcome! Login | Register | | Advanced Search

 

LEGAL MATTERS: Does Your Car Insurance Really Cover You?—You may meet the RI minimum, but that…

NEW: Brown Named Top 10 University to Work For in US—New ranking puts Brown at the very top...

Dear John: His Girlfriend Wants a Girlfriend, Too—Is he willing to share her with another...…

Red Sox Report: Yankees’ Problems Similar To Boston’s—tied for last with Sox in AL East

Coaching decision at Brown coming soon—Bears' basketball head coach to be named...

NEW: Nurse Suspended for Over-Prescribing Adderall, Ritalin, Xanax—Levels of 2x to 3x recommended dosages...

Smart Benefits: The Secret to a Winning Wellness Program—Hint: it begins with a 'C'...

Inside Therapy: When “Why” Won’t Work—It's the first question, but there may be…

Dealing with Arthritis: Do You Need Joint Replacement?—If your knee hurts, read this...

College Admissions: 3 Myths About the SATs—Don't believe everything you hear...

 
 

Should Convicted Drug Offenders Be Able to Volunteer in Schools? Take the Poll.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

 

Should a parent who has been convicted of a drug offense – and is no longer addicti or using drugs – be allowed to volunteer at their child’s school?

  •     59 vote - Yes
  •     47 vote - No

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Cranston School District says that a prior drug conviction should bar someone from volunteering in a school. But the Rhode Island ACLU argues that this policy discriminates against parents like Jessica Gianfrocco—a former heroin addict who has been drug free for six years.

The Rhode Island ACLU yesterday filed a lawsuit in Superior Court charging that the policy—which was adopted about a year ago—is discriminatory and unfair. The ACLU says the policy automatically disqualified volunteers from serving if they have a prior drug conviction, but teachers and others who work in Cranston schools are not disqualified if they have a similar record. (Click here to read the policy—scroll down to pages 49 and 50 on the PDF.)

Gianfrocco applied to be a volunteer at the Arlington Elementary School where her daughter started kindergarten last year, but her application was turned down because she had been convicted of on two counts of felony possession of heroin. She said she appealed to both the superintendent and the school committee and was told there was nothing they could do.

She said children whose parents volunteer in their schools do better later in life—and she wanted to make sure her daughter had that opportunity. She said she felt “inadequate” and “embarrassed” when she was told she was not allowed. “Immediately I felt just like really embarrassed,”  Gianfrocco said. “Now all the teachers know. Now everyone knows I was denied. Are they wondering why I was denied?”

Gianfrocco previously had been allowed to volunteer at her daughter’s daycare and for her cheerleading team with no problem.

At a press conference yesterday she recalled the awkward moment her daughter asked her why she couldn’t volunteer at her school too. “I would say, ‘My boss won’t let me have the day off work,’” Gianfrocco said. "She knows my boss because I brought her to work with me and she would say, ‘Yes he does he will let you have the day off. Just say it’s for me.’” (Click here to watch the video.)

PTG President Says Policy Should Be Changed

Rhonda Moore, the president of the Arlington Elementary Parent Teacher Group and parent of a second-grader at the school, understands that the school district wants to keep child predators away from schools, but says the policy should be changed to accommodate parents like Gianfrocco (pictured right) who have recovered and paid their debt to society.

She described Gianfrocco as a person of good character who is a committed member of the PTG, serving as its correspondence coordinator. “She’s a trustworthy person. I would trust her to watch my kids,” I find her to be a very good person.”

Moore said many parents did not want to pay $5 for the background criminal check. As a result, she said the school only has about a dozen parents on its volunteer list.

She doubted that many parents would have a problem with Gianfrocco being one of those volunteers. “A lot of people know her character,” Moore said. “She’s a stable face at the school. She’s always there to pick up her daughter on time.”

ACLU Leader Says Ex-Offenders Mistreated

Steven Brown, the executive director of the Rhode Island ACLU (pictured left), said the group has heard that other school districts are considering policies similar to the one in Cranston.

“This policy puts an unnecessary and really cruel barrier in the way of people like Jessica … who want to be part of the school, be part of their children’s education and yet can’t get out of a past criminal record that has gone by, that’s she’s all she can to erase,” Brown said. “And we think that’s terribly unfair.”

He said Gianfrocco had done everything possible to fix her life and pay her debt. As part of her recovery, he said she had attended a 12-step program and now was taking classes to become a drug counselor for others struggling with dependency.

“Our society as a general rule has been extraordinarily hypocritical when it comes to ex-offenders,” Brown said. “We demand that they rehabilitate themselves which is perfectly appropriate. But then when they do so we continue to punish them and stigmatize them in various ways. And Jessica’s situation is a perfect example of that.”

Former School Principal Criticizes Policy

Neil Corkery, executive director of the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Association of Rhode Island, applauded Gianfrocco for giving hope to other former drug addicts that they can turn their lives around. “For her to sit here in front of a host of cameras and confront this and be really a beacon of hope for a lot other young mothers and others who are in the same circumstances I think is a credit to her,” Corkery said.

Corkery, himself a past school principal, said he understood where the school district was coming from and wasn’t trying to “lay blame” on local administrators. “Sometimes there are unintended consequences to policies that people create that they didn’t anticipate,” Corkery said.

Cranston School Superintendent Peter Nero declined comment yesterday, as did school committee member Stephanie Culhane, who said she had yet to be served with the suit. 

Elliot Krieger, a spokesman for the Rhode Island Department of Education, said state law mandates criminal background checks for anyone who works in a school district. He said the department encourages districts to do similar checks on volunteers, but, because it is not a requirement, he said the state does not track how many districts do it.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Mike Hamel

Why Not??? This is a classic,"People shouldn't throw stones....". I would love to know how many elected officials, we have here in R.I., who hold office but have had criminal charges in the past. How many were charged and yet ran for office again?

I'm not sure what belongs at number one, on all the things wrong with this state. Hypocrisy,corruption,taxes,double dipping,officials trying to cheat the tax system,union officials making thousands of dollars, a year and never show up for work, judges who don't pay a penny toward their retirement collecting hundreds of thousands in retirement benefits and moving to Florida because taxes in RI are too high. DUHHHH!!!

These are all examples of whats wrong with this state. This lady wants to be involved in her childs life and is a reformed drug user. Who do we want to set an example? Her, or these other bozos who are screwing us every day.

She is an example we should all aspire to. If I had to teach my children how to go the straight and narrow I would take them to her, not these other idiots. Walk a mile, in her shoes, then judge. Staying in her childs life, this way, is probably the thing that has her focused on doing good rather than falling back to drugs.

We are such an immoral, corrupt, and hypocritical state and yet we judge others so quickly.

donna read

IT is the law. We have to uphold the by-laws and folow them. However we should change the laws and put up good reasons why some parents should be able to be with their children. I myself voluntered and enjoyed that experience very much. Six years is a long time, being neat and clean and having a good "track record" does make a difference. I think a judge can and should issue permission for her to be allowed to help in her daughters school. Each sober and clean person should be allowed to help their children, it is so very important to lead and love in a nurturing way. The Law does not love. It only leads. A Judge can lead the parent into being allowed to love.

Kelly Florenz

She is not only a drug addict, she is a FELON! Why bother with the BCI checks, if they are not going to be enforced? I have to go thru the check every year to be able to assist my children's school... I would not bother if I had a felony conviction (or any other conviction) on my record. What ever happened to LIVING WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR ACTIONS??????? The ACLU needs to take a hike. They are not interested in the protection of our children. Finally, it is a shame what she is doing to her daughter! She is going to be made fun of all thru her school years. Poor kid.

Pam Thomas

The most hilarious part of this ridiculous situation is that they've only got 12 volunteers in the school because parents are too cheap to pay $5 for a background check! Parents there don't care about volunteering anyway, apparently. If they don't want to do it, why are they splitting hairs over reformed people who do?

eugene fry

Aside from the shameful grammer of the poll question, don't you have an editor?

Why is the ACLU poking the nose into this policy, there must be a reason behind this.

When are people going to be held responisable for their actions?
I would not let this person near my child. Would you?
Poor Jessica Gianfrocco, the whole world does not revolve arround her!

Sandra Ross

Having a BCI check for a prospective employee or volunteer is not a blanket refusal to allow them to participate in an activity in a school, preschool or private business. It is a guide to the past behavior of a person. It allows us to decide if the "crime" is serious enough to affect the person's current behavior. It was a drug crime which can be easily evaluated by assessing the person's current drug behavior, either by the years she has been "clean" or asking for a drug test result from a physician. This is a problem which could have been decided by common sense. Unfortuneately, this is something which is seriously lacking in our public officials. We need good volunteers in the school and this woman has the necessary requirements: she is currently a good citizen and has a child that will benefit by her presence.

Mark A. Markrush

Please tell Steve Brown that he could hire heroine addicts to watch his kids in his own home but I would rather he didn't include me in this one. Also; if you want a fair assessment of this situation; you should only ask parents with children in school for their opinion. It is easy to pass judgment and say it is okay when it doesn't affect you or your family.

If Steve gets his way; we will tear down any trace of prayer from the school and replace with (former?) heroine addicts/felons. Mark/Johnston RI

Erich Sturn

Has it been proven she's turned her life around and become clean/sober for six years? Also, for someone who is so embarrassed of word of her prior felony drug conviction getting out, she doesn't seem to be shying away from the cameras.

I personally support reformed addicts wholeheartedly, but I'd be extremely cautious when it came to them working with children. If she'd been tested and cleared, and we knew the individual in question was no longer using, that would be fine with me. Rushing through a process which didn't even check to ensure the woman was no longer using drugs - that's something else entirely.

glen rod

If it were a man convicted of the same offence im sure more people would not be so warm and fuzzy over this issue.

The drug issue does not make this person a bad person. There are many Alcoholics teaching our kids already. its just that she is a volunteer and not an employee, and lawyers like Mr Brown are frothing at the mouth for a person like this to slip...so they can file a suit and attack an already cash strapped local Municipality due to their Negligence...




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.