| | Advanced Search


Fall Activities for the Whole Family—Mark your calendars for the best activities of…

Skywatching: Seagrave Memorial Observatory Centennial (1914-2014)—Skyscrapers, Inc., the Amateur Astronomical Society of Rhode…

Friday Financial Five - August 29, 2014—The Tax Foundation has put together a helpful…

RI Resource Recovery Collected 6K Pounds of Clothes—RI Resource Recovery has received more than 6,000…

5 Live Music Musts - August 29, 2014—We’ve got Rhythm and Roots and a whole…

The Cellar: Late Summer Values—While this week saw some fantastic weather there…

URI Ranked in Top 50 of LGBTQ-Friendly Universities in the Country—The University of Rhode Island has been ranked…

RI Politicians Who Sought Redemption from Misdeeds—See the Rhode Island politicians who have bounced…

Fall’s Best Foodie Events—Something that's different now -- much different than…

Brian Counihan Joins Iron Works Tavern as Executive Chef—Chef Brian Counihan has joined the team at…


Providence - Half of Taxes Pay for Retiree Benefits

Wednesday, June 15, 2011


Just over half of all taxes collected in Providence in 2010 were owed to pensions and benefits for all city retirees—sucking money away from basic services and adding to the property tax burden, according to new data obtained by GoLocalProv.

The data shows that Providence levied $294 million in taxes for the year. It owed $148 million to its pension plans and retiree health care—equal to 50.6 percent of the money the city raised in taxes, according to data compiled by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council.

Providence had one of the highest pension tax burdens in the state, coming in third behind Woonsocket and Central Falls, which owed 52.4 percent and 60.3 percent of their tax levies to retiree pensions and benefits in 2010. (Click here to view the full chart.)

“It’s an extremely serious problem and it’s really the worst of both worlds,” said Gary Sasse, a former director of the state Department of Administration and current fiscal adviser to the city council. “Because the unfunded liability exists, it threatens the credit worthiness of the city and if the city moves to address it, it’s putting an additional property tax burden on the taxpayers.”

The data indicates the amount of taxes owed to retiree pensions and benefits is sharply on the rise. In the prior year, Providence owed just 39.3 percent of its tax levy to retirement costs.

Sasse said the city is between a rock and a hard place: either it risks a downgrading of its credit rating, affecting its ability to borrow money to make improvements, or it raises taxes, lowering the quality of life for residents.

Pension payments cut into vital services

Even with higher taxes, essential services are threatened, said Sasse. “What you’re doing is you’re paying higher taxes for the sins of the past and these take away from essential services,” Sasse said.

“This is what we call crowding out—crowding out the services taxpayers receive,” said John Simmons, Executive Director of RIPEC.

Simmons pointed to the total amount owed in 2010, which was $148 million. Reducing that just by 10 percent would save nearly $15 million—more than the combined $12 million the city is seeking to carve out of the fire and police budgets. In the case of the police, the city is turning to layoffs of 80 officers as a last resort, in the face of stalled negotiations over concessions. Unions officials have warned the moved would have a significant impact on public safety.

With a lower pension payment, Simmons said the city wouldn’t have to make such deep cuts in the fire and police departments.

The rising costs so far have exceeded the ability—or the willingness of city officials—to pay them. As a result, Providence paid most of what it owed to its pension systems in 2010, but barely more than two-thirds of what it should have towards retiree health care. In all, the city actually paid $106 million towards retiree costs—equal to 36 percent of its tax levy.

Tax rate increase this year: 13 percent

“When we’re talking about a $1.2 billion liability it’s clear that the city council and the mayor have to work together to get this right for the retirement security of current and future retirees,” said city Councilman David Salvatore. “It’s unfair to the Providence taxpayers that they have to pay for these generous pensions—specifically generous disability pensions and benefits—while the city government is forced to go to the taxpayers to increase the tax levy on an annual basis.”

The proposed budget for 2012 would raise the levy by as much as 5.25 percent—one percent above the cap, a move that takes a supermajority vote of the city council. That, in turn, will result in a 13 percent increase in the city tax rate.

“The bottom line is taxpayers can’t afford what the city doesn’t have any more and our current pension system is unsustainable,” Salvatore said.

Simmons warns that the problem simply can’t be solved with “slight changes.”

Instead, he said the city has to do the same thing the state—specifically, General Treasurer Gina Raimondo—is doing: take a hard look at what is driving up the costs of the system. Simmons, who is a former Director of Administration for the city, said officials should pay close attention to the accrual rate for benefits, COLAs, and disability pensions.

So far, Providence Mayor Angel Taveras has not come out with a comprehensive pension reform package, although his administration maintains it remains a top priority that will be addressed once a balanced budget has been passed. In the meantime, the city is backing key legislation at the state level that would help rein in some of the costs.

One bill would allow the city to shift medical coverage for retirees onto Medicare at the age of 65, saving an estimated $11.6 million. The city is also counting on receiving $4.6 million from the Governor Lincoln Chafee’s MAST program—which rewards communities that fully fund their pensions with added state aid.

If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Garry Sasse was Carcieri's fiscal genius. Thanks for the zillion dollar cuts in aid to cities and towns, Garry. John Simmons was Director of Administration under Paolino and Cicilline. He was the guy deciding how money was spent, negotiating contracts and setting fiscal policy. His wife was Cicilline's top administrator during the final years of that administration. Now Simmons washes his hands and warns that the problem simply can’t be solved with “slight changes.”

Comment #1 by Edward Smith on 2011 06 15

is it possible to have a concerted effort in eliminating the fraudulant pensions ?
review the top administators of departments pensions, which in many cases
equal three and four times the pensions of the rank and file . cap the colas or tie into the cpi , and cap the top amount allowable pension as opposed to being based on highly inflatable earnings .13 percent raise in property tax. thanking you simmons, and oh yeah. cicilline .

Comment #2 by Nick Patriarca on 2011 06 15

The pensions need to be cut and everybody needs to pay 50% of their healthcare. The party is over. One way or another this will happen. The city does it, or bankruptcy does it.
There is no way around it. The numbers simply do not work.

Comment #3 by Matt Cavanagh on 2011 06 15

the city may be saved for a year or two but why bother....just file bankruptcy right now...the city will not fix itself. its all over..

the debt is too much....its like personal bankruptcy. there are too many bills and they will never have the income or resources to pay them back.

a receiver will be appointed , all contracts voided. all political dead weight fired, all waste eliminated, thats it.

the mayor and the city council can take the rest of their term off.

just like central falls.. all of a sudden, it is running much better. it is stil in a hole but the receiver did things that the mayor and council would never do.

nobody wants to file now. they think things will fix themselves. but in 2 years, they will all be asking to have a receiver appointed.

Comment #4 by john paycheck on 2011 06 15

Lets not forget that the reason the tax burden is so high to individual property owners in the city, is that more than half of all the property in the city is tax exempt... colleges, hospitals, etc...
If they all did their share, you could cut your taxes in half.

Comment #5 by fair play on 2011 06 15

Simmons pointed to the total amount owed in 2010, which was $148 million. Reducing that just by 10 percent would save nearly $15 million—more than the combined $12 million the city is seeking to carve out of the fire and police budgets. In the case of the police, the city is turning to layoffs of 80 officers as a last resort, in the face of stalled negotiations over concessions.

So if he gets the 10% cut in pensions he would use that to fund the police and the fire departments?
This doesn't solve anything!!!!
How about reducing the tax burden on the homeowners?
This is why Simmons is a bafoon.

Comment #6 by george washington on 2011 06 15

And then the public sector retirees move to Florida where a.) they don't have to pay income tax; and 2.) they could care less what happens to RI's taxpayers.

Comment #7 by Todd B on 2011 06 15

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.