Extra Vacation Time Costs Providence Nearly $500,000
Monday, October 18, 2010

“It’s the constant battle of this administration trying to get one over on the people of Providence,” said John Igliozzi, chairman of the city council finance committee. “The idea is to get away with as much as you possibly can without getting caught.”
The person with the most time is Col. Dean Esserman, the chief of police. He has racked up 24 extra weeks so far and is due for six more extra weeks in January. The total cost? $90,457.50.
Employees Could Collect $263K in January
Overall, 15 directors and department heads have received extra paid vacation time, costing $452,979.80 as of January 1, 2011, according to data provided by the City Internal Auditor in response to a GoLocalProv query. That figure includes the extra time they have used as well as the unused time for which they will be paid when they leave city service.

A number of those directors are expected to leave when a new administration takes charge in January. If all 15 departed and collected their extra unused vacation time, the city budget would see an unexpected hit of $263,027.47.
Lombardi calls the expense “misappropriation” of funds that would be in violation of the city ordinance on vacation pay. “This is an additional cost that has never been seen by Providence,” Lombardi said. “This has never happened in Providence where people were provided additional leave.”
Mayor Confronted over Costs Five Years Ago
Lombardi first blew the whistle on the practice in a May 4, 2005 memo. At the time, he estimated the extra vacations had a cost of $137,000 and predicted the amount would soar to hundreds of thousands of dollars if unchecked.
“During a time where taxes are mostly being raised, it does not make financial sense to dole out these benefits,” Lombardi wrote in the memo. “It is also unfair to rank and file employees who have worked here fifteen years and only receive three weeks vacation per year while a select now get equal vacation time after working six weeks. This administration is creating a two-class system in the city workforce. The long-term effect is a complete break down of morale of the City’s rank and file.”
Instead of stopping the practice, Lombardi says the mayor and the administration “chose to ignore the costs.”
City Says Ordinance Does Not Apply
City Solicitor Adrienne Southgate told GoLocalProv that those employees who had individual contracts were not bound by the ordinance.
Karen Watts, spokeswoman for Cicilline, defended the practice. “The budget for the Mayor’s staff is approved by the Council every year and it is the Mayor’s prerogative to allocate resources for his staff as he deems appropriate,” Watts said. “In addition, it is the Mayor’s prerogative to make appropriate offers of employment to attract excellent prospective candidates for service on his staff.”
Lombardi concedes that the mayor may have the authority to give extra vacation time to directors while they are still working for the city—but he insists that the city ordinance should still bar them from being paid for any of that unused extra time once they leave. And, he points out that the payouts for unused vacation time are not included in the annual city budget.
So far, three employees who received extra time under Cicilline have left the city, collecting a total of $35,225 when they left. Those employees were: Leo Messier, former Director of Emergency Management; Michael Mello, former Chief of Staff, and John Simmons, former Director of Administration.

Related Articles
- Providence City Retirees: Who Makes the Most?
- GoLocalProv Investigation Uncovers 25 Illegal Pensions in Johnston
- GoLocal Investigation Uncovers More Sweet Pension Deals
- Councilman Warns $1.2 Billion Pension Liability Could Get Worse
- Lynch Blasts Cicilline on Pension Crisis
- The Pension Burden: How Other RI Cities Are Dealing with It
Enjoy this post? Share it with others.
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.



Comments:
RI Taxpayer
6:41am on Monday, October 18, 2010
And this spendthrift of other peoples money, Cicilline, is leading in the polls for congressman of the first district?!?
Boggles the mind.
ed curtis
7:03am on Monday, October 18, 2010
Only half a million bucks?
Imagine what this Progressive can do in Washington DC -
He's destroyed Providence and would join 'Bammy in destroying this country.
.
Nick Patriarca
10:47am on Monday, October 18, 2010
Cicilline did this and Cicilline did that .
All to the detrement of the taxpayers and to his personal benefit. The City Council complains but takes no action regarding these
questionable and apparently illegal machinations .Why don't they conduct investigations and audits to take action regarding these actions ? Don't they have any power regarding this Mayor? Enough is enough!
I know of no other City emloyeee who would remain emolyed after oing 10 % of what Cicilline has done . A majority of which appears to be criminal .And what Esserman
gets away with under this administration is
unbelievable .And again, no accountability .
And these are only what we are currently aware of . Discraceful and possily illegal .
And Cicilline being considered for Washington
is shameful , as shameful and detremental as Esserman remaining on as Chief .The City Council does nothing, so God help us .
Richard Kerbel
1:34pm on Monday, October 18, 2010
Employees of the Mayor do not receive a day more of vacation time than they're entitled to by their contract or terms of employment. To suggest otherwise is reckless and simply inaccurate.
Richard Kerbel
Director of Administration
City of Providence
Nick Patriarca
2:08pm on Monday, October 18, 2010
Says you, employee of the Mayor . Since you
are included in this arbitrary abuse .
ed curtis
2:10pm on Monday, October 18, 2010
*...do not receive a day more of vacation time than they’re entitled to by their contract or terms of employment.*
Nice misdirection -
What are these *entitlements* and/or *terms* of employment? Something the regular Joe Taxpayer gets from their private sector jobs?
Highly doubtful and another big reason for the removal of politicians who placate to unions!
.
Hank S
7:40pm on Monday, October 18, 2010
I think Igliozzi needs his head checked out, in more ways than 1
Donn Roach
6:46am on Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Man, Cicilline will probably win and we'll have more of the same in Washington.
RI we need to wake up and smell the coffee beans because as much as the blame needs to go to the mayor, the city council should also make sure this is getting to voters who, if aware of this, would have a hard time fathoming such large amounts of vacation time compared to what their private sector positions were paying.
But, will RI Taxpayers even care about this? That's the question.
ed curtis
8:23am on Tuesday, October 19, 2010
The next sound you hear is Rhode Island and Providence Plantations flushed down the Obammy toilet.
On November 2nd, we will know whether the taxpayers or the unions run this state.
If Cicilline, Langevin and Chafee are elected, kiss the RI&PP; chance at an economic recovery good-bye and welcome in higher taxes, a welfare state and big government spending to thank the union thugs.
The Progressive agenda!
Vote "R" for the Recovery of this country.
Vote "D" for the Destruction of it.
.