| | Advanced Search


Misquamicut Beach to Present FallFest—The Misquamicut Business Association will host FallFest at…

Gronkowski “Good to Go” Week 1—Rob Gronkowski told reporters at Gillette Stadium that…

Russell Moore: Experience Makes Caprio a No-Brainer for Treasurer—Let's face it: politics is strange business.

Smart Benefits: Two Regs Issued on Contraceptive Coverage—Two regulations on contraceptive coverage were recently issued…

Peace Flag Project to Host Rhode Island Month of Peace in September—The Peace Flag Project will host over 30…

Don’t Miss: Fall Newport Secret Garden Tours—The Benefactors of the Arts will present a…

Fall Activities for the Whole Family—Mark your calendars for the best activities of…

Skywatching: Seagrave Memorial Observatory Centennial (1914-2014)—Skyscrapers, Inc., the Amateur Astronomical Society of Rhode…

The Urban Gardener: Harvesting Green Beans + Sunflowers—Gardening made simple...

Friday Financial Five - August 29, 2014—The Tax Foundation has put together a helpful…


Majority of Anti-Pension Reform Lawmakers Returning to Smith Hill

Monday, November 19, 2012


Despite having been targeted by House and Senate leadership and in some cases, General Treasurer Gina Raimondo, the majority of state lawmakers who voted against last year’s statewide pension overhaul bill will return to Smith Hill for the 2013 legislative session.

Of the 17 nay votes cast last November, only two State Representatives –Leo Medina (D-12) and Rene Menard (D-45) — were defeated. A third Rep., Roberto DaSilva (D-65), ran unsuccessfully for State Senate and Senator John Tassoni did not seek re-election.

That means 13 Representatives and Senators who voted against the bill were re-elected earlier this month.

Most didn’t even have to sweat. Senator Frank Ciccone (D-7), Rep. John DeSimone (D-5), Rep. Ray Hull (D-6), Rep. Robert Jacquard (D-17), Rep. Scott Guthrie (D-28) and Deborah Fellela (D-43) all won by at least 19 percentage points while four Representatives –John Carnevale (D-13), Charlene Lima (D-14) Raymond Johnston (D-61) and Mary Messier (D-62)— walked to re-election without an opponent in either the September primary or November’s general election.

Three others, Rep. Peter Palumbo (D-16), Rep. Spencer Dickinson (D-35) and Rep. William San Bento (D-58) all squeaked by in their Democratic primaries (San Bento won by just one vote). Dickinson also faced a difficult challenge in the general election, winning by less than ten points against Republican James Haldeman.

Unions Make a Statement

Union officials say both the primary and general election results should serve as a statement to those who are considering running for higher office in 2014 (Raimondo is widely considered a potential candidate for Governor).

“EngageRI, RI-CAN, and other anti-pension players proved to be non entries in the election,” said National Education Association government relations director Patrick Crowley. “The real players were teachers, public employees, women's organizations, Marriage Equality Rhode Island, Ocean State Action and other progressive groups. Democrats should look to partner with these groups if they want the corner office in 2014 - even if it means re-thinking their current strategy on the pension lawsuit."

The unions are taking the state to Superior Court early next month in an attempt to block the pension reform legislation, which switches public employees to a 401k-style hybrid plan, freezes cost-of-living-adjustments for retirees and alters the retirement age. When the bill was signed into law, Raimondo said the changes immediately cut the state’s unfunded pension liability by $3 billion.

Last week, the state announced that it had added New York lawyer David Boies to its defense team. Boies represented then-Democratic Presidential candidate Al Gore in the infamous Gore V. Bush case that went to the Supreme Court.

Mixed Results for House Leadership

Still, not every anti-pension reform lawmaker went unscathed. Menard, a retired firefighter on a disability pension who has long clashed with House Speaker Gordon Fox, watched as his primary opponent Mia Ackerman received an outpouring over support from Fox and several groups who supported the reform package. Raimondo even campaigned on behalf of Ackerman, who won the primary by less than 9 points. Rep. Medina, who has had numerous run-ins with the law over the last year, also lost his primary despite being backed by organized labor.

But House leadership also swung and missed on two other Representatives they chose to target. Dickinson, who was highly critical of a redistricting process he considered unfair, watched as House leadership handpicked his primary opponent (Kathy Fogarty), but still managed to pick up the victory. He then attempted to fire back at Fox by supporting the Speaker’s primary opponent (Mark Binder). Fox won re-election.

House leadership also went after Palumbo, the conservative Cranston Democrat who defeated Michelle Bergin in September’s primary. Bergin was unsuccessful despite receiving campaign contributions from Fox and two of his leadership PACs.

Bought and Paid For

While organized labor didn’t exclusively support candidates who voted against pension reform, those who did were able to cash in the form of campaign contributions. In August, GoLocalProv reported that the elected officials who voted against the bill had received over $120,000 from union political action committees (PACs) in the months following its passage.

At the time, Rhode Island Statewide Coalition executive director Donna Perry suggested the campaign contributions gave an appearance that legislators were “bought and paid for” by the unions. She noted that “for far too long, they have had an upper hand in influencing how a legislator votes.”

“If ever there was a vivid example of the direct connection between union financial muscle and a major legislative vote, it’s this,” Perry said. “When you are casting a vote that is so significantly against the best interests of the RI taxpayer and so clearly aimed at appeasing a powerful interest, and you end up in the distinct minority with that vote, I suppose it’s not a surprise that rewards are doled out after the fact.”


Dan McGowan can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter: @danmcgowan.


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


It is mind-boggling to me that union members recently found out that their pensions were in deep trouble. I will "assume" that the members receive a financial statement at least once a year stating what their pension was worth. Because they pay into it I will "assume" again they know how much $$$ belongs to them.
Why is this whole pension mess a surprise???

Comment #1 by Chris MacWilliams on 2012 11 19

The people who produce something in RI and who fund these pension programs are leaving by the boatload. Soon enough there won't be enough producers to make it all work. Then what?
We'll see how that government working from the middle class out BS works then. It will be the middle and lower wage earners shouldering an even higher percentage of the burden.


Comment #2 by Joel Hovanesian on 2012 11 19

To: Chris Williamson

You have "assume(d)" correctly. Members of the pension system (FYI, they are not all union members) have indeed received regular updates. Those updates include the sum of their personal contributions and the total of the state contributions. The updates maintained that the benefits promised to them on co-signed state forms would be forthcoming.

Don't blame the victims for the duplisity and malfeasance of the state.

Comment #3 by Brian L Kennedy on 2012 11 19

Brian- I am not blaming the members for this mess. BUT I would blame their leaders for not watching over and protecting member pensions. I say this because Union Leader pensions are fully funded. On the surface it looks like their leaders took care of their own pensions and did not do the same for member pensions.

Comment #4 by Chris MacWilliams on 2012 11 19

Isn't it amazing that they can cut COLAs for retirees, but still continue their out of control spending on themselves (i.e. personal state paid transportation, appointing aides to well paying positions etc). All the politicians who went to bat to screw retirees and plan on running in 2014( Riamondo & others) beware we are waiting to stick to you in 2014.

Comment #5 by Mark St. Pierre on 2012 11 19

I know pensioners don't want to hear this but everybody has been making sacrifices because of the bad economy and poor past decisions that can't be reversed. The state can't afford the current system. Complaints and threats about 2014 aren't going to do anything. Their pensions are going to get trimmed and the chips will fall where they may later. They can either sit down with lawmakers and strike a good faith deal that they can live with or have the terms dictated by the courts. I know they signed a deal that is not being lived up to and it isn't what they want, but those are the only two options.

Comment #6 by Steve Jones on 2012 11 19

Do the math. Here's one example concerning Council 94 They pull forty dollars a month out of 4000 paychecks. That is only Union dues. That's $160,000 a month..almost 2 million a year? Where does that money go?

Comment #7 by John Munroe on 2012 11 19

RISC complains alleges politicians were "bought and paid for" with $120,000 in campaing contributions yet one Wall Street group, RI-CAN, raised $213,000 this election cylce alone. Where is the outrage against enormous out-of-State corporate money?

Comment #8 by James PARISI on 2012 11 19

How many pro-reform members were returned to the GA?

Comment #9 by Max Diesel on 2012 11 20

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.