| | Advanced Search

 

State Report: Marijuana Tax + Bill Targets Prostitutes and Pimps—Plus increased sentences for gang crimes

John Rooke - Thinking Out Loud—JR's column on the sports stories and personalities…

RI Beauty Insider: Pedi Nation – Get the Best Pedicure Ever—A guide to finding a pristine pedi place

Fit for Life: Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail—Plan and prioritize, and you will prevail

Arthur Schaper: Grand Theft Auto Cicilline—MINDSETTER Arthur Schaper examine's Cicilline's role in Prov's…

Five Live Music Musts – April 18, 2014—Great vibes await

Report: Preston Murphy Leaving URI for Boston College—Preston Murphy Leaves URI for Boston College

EXCLUSIVE: Bryant Tells Grads No Selfies with President at Grad—Prohibiting selfies?

PC Athletics gets high marks—Friar winter sports #1 among Big East schools...

NEW: Providence’s Al Forno Featured as a Best Pizza Spot in the US—Another accolade for Al Forno

 
 

Guest MINDSETTER™ Paula Hodges: When Choice isn’t Enough

Saturday, January 19, 2013

 

Forty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the constitutionally protected right to privacy includes every woman's right to make her own personal medical decisions, without the interference of politicians – including the right to end a pregnancy. As we approach this milestone, there’s been debate as to whether or not the reproductive justice movement and organizations like Planned Parenthood are connecting with post-Roe generations. Speaking as a “Millennial” myself, I can say that young women do value the impact of Roe. But politicians and traditional powers don’t see the world in the way we do. As someone who’s chosen a career in social justice and who spends a lot of time with other young activists, there’s hope we can right this ship as our generation takes the helm.

Planned Parenthood recognizes that the abortion conversation in America has evolved. As a nation and as a movement, our language has shifted. It’s time we started looking beyond the tired binary labels of “pro-choice” and “pro-life.” In fact, the number of people who say abortion should remain safe and legal is significantly higher than the number of people who readily identify as “pro-choice.” Our language must reflect the change in the way we think, talk and organize around abortion rights. Simply put – “Choice” as a framework just isn’t enough anymore.

Last November voters strongly affirmed that politicians should not be involved in a woman’s personal medical decisions about her pregnancy. From Smith Hill to Capitol Hill, Planned Parenthood will continue to protect access to health care for women — taking action to ensure that women have access to care, no matter what. Forty years after Roe, Planned Parenthood’s mission remains the same: to protect the fundamental right of all individuals to manage their own fertility and sexual health and to ensure access to the services, education and information to realize that right. 

Sadly, Rhode Island lags behind our New England neighbors when it comes to teen pregnancy rates. An investment in preventive services saves public dollars: one dollar spent on family planning saves the state $3.75. Yet we’re forced to waste time fighting unnecessary, shaming legislation like mandatory-waiting periods and ultrasounds. We need a legislature that understands that investing in prevention and comprehensive sex education is the only proven way to address unintended pregnancy. 

Millions of young people today are, like me, paying off student loans, renting and not buying, entering the workforce during a recession and experiencing high unemployment. Reproductive rights and access to affordable contraception are economic justice issues. The annual cost of birth control prior to the Affordable Care Act was $600—a cost born almost entirely by women. 

As I look at the work we need to do in the next 40 years – it’s time for our language and our policy work to reflect the real conversation. Simply changing labels and adopting new messages isn’t enough. We must work as a movement to ensure that the right to manage our own fertility and sexual health is seen holistically: that we take into account all of the factors – legal, economic and otherwise - that prevent women from having affordable coverage for contraceptives, cancer detection and care, infertility treatments and yes, abortion. 

As we forge ahead, my hope for 2053 is that old labels and endless fights will become what they should be: history.

Paula Hodges is the Public Policy & Advocacy Director for Planned Parenthood Southern New England and Planned Parenthood Votes! Rhode Island.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Tricia Cahill

Abortion is the taking of a human life... it is the ultimate act of domestic violence...

Tricia Cahill

Planned Parenthood is in the killing business. They perform approximately 324,000 abortions per year, using various methods on women at various stages of pregnancy.

Marisa Picardi

http://www.jillstanek.com/2011/11/breaking-whistleblower-alleges-texas-planned-parenthood-committed-massive-medicaid-fraud/ Planned Parenthood and massive medicaid fraud

Odd Job

"Our language must reflect the change in the way we think, talk and organize around abortion rights. Simply put – “Choice” as a framework just isn’t enough anymore."

You left me hanging. What besides choice are you talking about? What new labels should their be.
Lot of yap but not much zap.

Christopher Lee

Abraham Lincoln once said about slavery: "So plain that no one, high or low, ever does mistake it, except in a plainly selfish way; for although volume upon volume is written to prove slavery a very good thing, we never hear of the man who wishes to take the good of it, by being a slave himself."

Substitute the word abortion for slavery. I ask, who among us wants to trade places with an aborted fetus?

jon paycheck

She's drinking a lot of koolaid.

Someday she will realize what she has done and
Will be haunted.

Petr Petrovich

Excellent article. I remeber how enthusiastic I was with my first job. While I commend you for advocating for woemns rights with regard to cancer prevention and reproductive education, i would caution you to not, "count your chickens before they hatch" (excuse the pun). I would urge you to read Roe again a little more carefully. While it did assert a constituional rights within the 14th amendment pneumbra, it did not unconditionally assert a womens rights to reproductive freedom. Once the state can assert an interest, your precious rights become diminished. With the rate of medical progress, that interest will be getting sooner and sooner. In addition, most constitional scholars would argue that Roe could be characterised as one of the worst reasoned opinions of the modern court. Essentially the court said we are not theologians, doctors or gentesists, and can not possibly determine when life begins. However, life begins in the third tri-mester. I say this because, instead of moving forard with cultural education, I would be more focused on the nine members who control this issue.
In addition, your argument for affordable contraception is flawed. I can make the same argument that if I smoke my entire life, the government should pay for any cessation program and any treatment I need as a result of my conduct. I don't have to smoke, but it feels good. Chris Lee, excellent anaogy as usual.

Wuggly Ump

Interesting wording about "saving public dollars". How much would we save if we don't pay for the teen's baby?
The argument about paying for birth control or an unwanted child. It's not an "or" question.
If I'm not having sex with the women I'm not responsible for it I shouldn't have to pay for it.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.