| | Advanced Search

 

Revs Snap The Skid, Win 3-0 Over Colorado—The New England Revolution took the field at…

Block Calls for End of Political Corruption in Rhode Island—Republican candidate for Governor Ken Block has called…

NEW: Smiley Unveils Good Government Plan; Receives Roberts’ Endorsement—Democratic candidate for Mayor Brett Smiley has unveiled…

NEW: Fung Calls on Chafee to Rescind Caprio Beach Contract—Cranston Mayor and Republican candidate for Governor, Allan…

NEW: RI GOP Calls for Palumbo to Step Down—Rhode Island Republicans have asked for State Representative…

Organizations Past Due on Police Detail: See Who Owes the Most—Organizations Past Due on Police Detail: See Who…

Chafee Confirms State Investigation into Caprio Beach Contract; Will Block FOIA Requests—Chafee Confirms State Investigation into Caprio Beach Contract;…

Santurri: Will The Democratic Race for Providence Mayor Become Primarily Negative?—Santurri: Will The Democratic Race for Providence Mayor…

It’s All About Education: High Stakes Testing & Common Core Debate—It’s All About Education: High Stakes Testing &…

Angela Moore Fashion Show and Champagne Brunch Debuts at Rosecliff—To celebrate the 375th anniversary of Newport, the…

 
 

Obama Or Clinton? Doherty Refuses To Disclose

Saturday, May 14, 2011

 

Republican candidate for Congress in Rhode Island’s 1st District Colonel Brendan Doherty admitted Friday to voting in at least two Democratic primaries before voting in last September’s GOP primary, saying he recalls supporting local candidates in both 2006 and 2008.

But that doesn’t explain why Doherty voted in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, which featured no local races and occurred on the same day as the Republican presidential primary.

Need For Common Ground

In a wide-ranging interview with GoLocalProv, Doherty maintained that his support was only for local Democrats and said he couldn’t recall voting in a presidential primary that took place only three years ago.

Suggesting that both parties are to blame for problems across the state and throughout the country, Doherty said he hopes to bring people from both sides of the table together to take corrective action. Doherty noted that he has Democrats, Republicans and Independents supporting his campaign.

“Partisan politics has become so polarized and it’s not helping our state,” Doherty said Friday afternoon. “We need to find common ground.”

Focus On Waste And Fraud

Doherty said he wants to go to Washington to “shine light” on waste, fraud, corruption and the management problem the country currently has. Echoing the words of his former boss Governor Donald Carcieri and former gubernatorial candidate John Robitaille, the Republican candidate also said the country has a “spending problem.”

Arguing that a business wouldn’t be able to run the way the country does, Doherty said one of the first ways to save money would be to cut waste and fraud from the federal government. He said he would look to find ways to prevent the $60 billion in Medicaid and Medicare fraud the country has experienced, but warned politicians should not be going after the elderly.

“We need to protect our elderly,” he said. “We owe it them to make sure they are protected.”

Why He Left State Police

During the interview, Doherty also cleared the air on his departure as head of the Rhode Island State Police. He said he didn’t leave because of a disagreement over the Secure Communities initative, and noted that the state wound up supporting his stance.

“I did not leave for that reason. There is reason to leave over a disagreement,” Doherty said. “I thought it was irresponsible of Providence to attempt to opt out of Secure Communities, and my position is the same one the state ended up taking on it.”

Does Not Support “Amnesty Programs”

Doherty said he is not worried about backlash from the Latino community regarding Secure Communities, pointing to his record “building bridges in the minority community.” He said Secure Communities does not target any specific group.

On immigration, Doherty said he would have to look closer into initiatives like the DREAM Act, but he does not support any “amnesty programs.” He said elected officials have continued to let the country down when it comes to securing the border.

“What’s wrong with securing the border in a post 9/11 world,” Doherty asked. “I support a path to citizenship for people trying to achieve the American dream, but this is 2011 and [immigration reform] should have been done a long time ago.”

On The Wars

Doherty was explicit when it comes to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: bring the troops home. He expressed his full support for those serving in the military, but said the focus should about what’s happening in this country.

“America is hurting,” he said. “We cannot compromise their safety, but we need to bring our troops home as soon as possible.”

On His Opponents

Doherty said he was going to let the “pundits” handle the situation Congressman David Cicilline currently finds himself in, noting that he is focused on his own message and putting together a solid team.

Cicilline is viewed as vulnerable by many Rhode Islanders after a Brown University poll tagged him with a 17 percent approval rating. As the City of Providence continues to face financial struggles, the former mayor has faced constant backlash from the public and the media.

But Doherty was willing to talk about his potential opponent in the Republican primary, John Loughlin (at left). Asked how voters might view him compared with Loughlin, who has always voted Republican and nearly defeated Cicilline last November, Doherty said he expects to be the Republican nominee in 2012.

“I don’t know John Loughlin, but I do respect him,” Doherty said. “But John has had his opportunity, and I believe it’s my time now.”

 If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.

 

Related Articles

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

Anybody but lil Davey as far as I'm concerned!

*

Comment #1 by ed curtis on 2011 05 14

To American serviceman Loughlin...BD is a colonel in his own mind..just boots, big hat, leather gloves and amazing BS..but now he has RDW running things..thats dangerous because they run Twin Rivers...connect the dots..be well, stay safe John..come back and his royal rear

Comment #2 by lOUIS PRIMA on 2011 05 14

____________________________

Brendan Doherty came out of the box deceitful and telling otherwise unbelievable tales about his political past.

If we want such a person to represent the RI 1st, why change anything?

As for "GI Joe" Loughlin: Let us pray that he stays out of harms' way -- which should not be difficult unless you include paper cuts and bed sores as "harm."

Comment #3 by Charles Drago on 2011 05 14

DRAGO..SICKER THAN ADVERTISED..PUNK

Comment #4 by lOUIS PRIMA on 2011 05 14

Drago-John Loughlin is in his 50's-he should not be flying helicopters in a combat zone at that age anyway.How many people in the military his age are serving in Iraq/Afghanistan in any capacity?
IED's and mortar shells make "font line" a relative thing in this kind of war.Not to mention suicide bombings.
Your attempts to mock a man for serving his country are really over the line.If you dislike his policy positions,go after him on those,but what you're doing is wrong.I realize arguing with you is like trying to keep kudzu contained,but I doubt even those on the left here think you're correct on this tactic of yours.

Comment #5 by joe bernstein on 2011 05 15

_________________________________

Joe,

Please let me be clear on the following:

1. I pray for John Loughlin's safe return from his latest military assignment.

2. I do NOT mock Loughlin for serving his country.

3. Men and women of Loughlin's age are on the front lines in Afghanistan. My best friend is the Navy physician who is CIC of NATO medical forces there. Loughlin need not fly helicopters; surely his experience and expertise could be well- and better-applied closer to the action instead of in a desk job.

3. I question the motives behind Loughlin's decision to return to active duty given its timing and specifics.

Since I am not personally acquainted with Loughlin, I can judge his character only from afar -- via analyses of his public life choices.

Given that Loughlin chose to find an assignment with a guaranteed limited duration in a RELATIVELY safe area, I have concluded that his was a cynical, politically motivated tactical maneuver.

I ask you, Joe, how you would explain Loughlin's actions to the families and other loved ones of those Rhode Islanders who have made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Finally, I am not engaged in a tactical attack on Loughlin. Rather, I am a seasoned political observer who knows a stunt when he smells one. And whether or not you choose to believe me, I tell you honestly that I would have reached the same conclusions if Loughlin's move had been made by a political candidate of whom I approve.

Comment #6 by Charles Drago on 2011 05 15

"Finally, I am not engaged in a tactical attack on Loughlin. Rather, I am a seasoned political observer who knows a stunt when he smells one."

In other words, you have no ethics.

*

Comment #7 by ed curtis on 2011 05 15

_______________________

Logic worthy of a soft shell crab.

"Ed Curtis" reappears; a brain-damaged nation turns its eyes to you.

Comment #8 by Charles Drago on 2011 05 15

So let me get this right....if someone goes to IRAQ in any capacity other than to fight on the front lines they have an agenda? What is sad is that our soldiers are fighting for the rights of individuals like you to continually spew the idiocy.

The main story here is that Doherty is not a Republican and the Emperor has no cloths. He should have run as a democrat...PERIOD.

Comment #9 by guy smily on 2011 05 26

______________________________________________

"Guy Smiley," you and "Ed Curtis" must have taken -- and failed -- the same Logic course.

Your "if" postulate is pure nonsense. I make no such claim.

Try your word-shifting games with people at your own literary level. You're not even allowed on my elevator.

Try a pre-school if you're looking for candidates.

Comment #10 by Charles Drago on 2011 05 26

Old CD is spewing more of his elitist rhetoric.

I guess that happens to over the hill, has been, liberal Democrats - they always resort to personal attacks and misdirection tactics when they are cornered with the truth.

*

Comment #11 by ed curtis on 2011 05 26




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.