| | Advanced Search


Friday Financial Five - August 29, 2014—The Tax Foundation has put together a helpful…

RI Resource Recovery Collected 6K Pounds of Clothes—RI Resource Recovery has received more than 6,000…

5 Live Music Musts - August 29, 2014—We’ve got Rhythm and Roots and a whole…

The Cellar: Late Summer Values—While this week saw some fantastic weather there…

URI Ranked in Top 50 of LGBTQ-Friendly Universities in the Country—The University of Rhode Island has been ranked…

RI Politicians Who Sought Redemption from Misdeeds—See the Rhode Island politicians who have bounced…

Fall’s Best Foodie Events—Something that's different now -- much different than…

Brian Counihan Joins Iron Works Tavern as Executive Chef—Chef Brian Counihan has joined the team at…

Narragansett Bay Ranked #5 as Best for Boaters in US—Providence has ranked as the #5 best region…

newportFILM To Present Last Two Outdoor Screenings of the Summer—newportFILM will host their last two outdoor screenings…


Local Politicians Owe $1.3M in Campaign Fines

Thursday, February 14, 2013


Candidates for local and state office have been slammed with over $1.3 million in fines for failing to file campaign finance reports or submitting them late, state records show.

Violators include a number of candidates for the General Assembly, a former candidate for Attorney General, at least three Providence city councilmen, and several political action groups, such as the lobbying arm for a top local law firm, Moses and Afonso, the National Organization for Marriage, and the state political action committee for the Fraternal Order of Police.

Top offenders are former state Senate candidates Patrick McDonald and Michael Rollins, former state rep candidate Kevin Johnston, and former state Senator John Celona, who served more than two years in prison on federal corruption charges. All four have fines in excess of six figures. (See below table for the top 30 violators.)

Some kinds of candidates are represented more than others on the list. “This list is a black eye for the Providence City Council,” John Marion from Common Cause said, adding that, “the General Assembly, the body that writes the campaign finance laws, is represented far too much on this list.”

In all, 237 political action committees and candidates for a range of local and state offices owe a total of $1,356,050 according to Rhode Island Board of Elections records obtained by GoLocalProv.

Watchdog: system needs fixing

When GoLocalProv first reported on the fines in 2011, they amounted to $993,000. Now, the total has swelled to $1.3 million.

Marion expressed dismay over the latest figures. “It’s quite simply amazing to me that this list gets longer and longer and the amount keeps getting larger and larger,” he said.

“This is particularly disconcerting at a time of fiscal crisis, which the state is clearly in,” he added.

Ultimately, Marion said it’s voters, not state coffers, that suffer. “In the big picture, if politicians are not properly following the campaign law then the public will never know who is contributing to their campaigns,” Marion said. “Without that disclosure the public cannot hold them truly accountable in elections.”

Campaign finance reports are normally due at least once a quarter, even in non-election years. In election years, the deadlines change somewhat, depending on whether there is a primary in the race and the date of the election.

Late reports incur a $25 fee plus an additional late fee of $2 a day. Candidates who do not win office and do not necessarily plan a future campaign must nonetheless continue to file reports until they close their accounts with the Board of Elections, according to Richard Thornton, the Director of Campaign Finance.

State records show that a number of the top debts are from repeat offenders. McDonald hasn’t filed a report with the Board of Election in the decade since he ran for state Senate. Celona stopped submitting reports in 2004. Daniel Grzych has been tardy on 20 reports since 2004, but that hasn’t stopped him from running for state rep in every election since then.

Candidates can continue to fundraise and run for office, despite having delinquent accounts, according to Thornton.

Marion is calling for stepped up enforcement. “Common Cause needs to redouble our efforts to examine why the Board of Elections has been unable to enforce our campaign finance laws, examining the effectiveness of the Secretary of State’s effort to prevent lobbyists from registering once they are lapsed in their reports, as well as how other states handle outstanding fines,” he said.

State took ten candidates to court

Thornton said the state elections board sends out non-compliance notices for each late report. If that fails to get a response, the board issues a second notice. “Phone calls are made and e-mails sent in an effort to get the filer to comply,” Thornton said. “This process is repeated for each report due from a filer, but not filed.”

Candidates can seek an administrative appeal for penalties less than $5,000. After that, they can take their case to the Board of Elections at a public hearing. Amounts over $5,000 go straight to the board.

In cases where a filer is “non-responsive over an extended period” Thornton said the board may file a complaint in Superior Court, seeking a judgment for uncollected penalties and fees.

The board has done so recently with at least ten candidates, according to Thornton. Six cases have ended in a court judgment against the candidate. (See below list.)

The rest have been resolved, are heading towards settlement, or have pending hearings: Newport Councilman Stephen Coyne settled a year ago, agreeing to pay the full amount that he owed, $5,348, which the board has received. An attorney for Frederick Cavallaro, who ran for Barrington Town Council, is seeking a settlement. And hearings have been set for this spring in the cases against Grzych and Kevin Johnston, a state rep candidate from East Providence.

Candidate explanations vary

Candidates contacted for comment gave a wide range of explanation for why they have failed to file timely campaign finance reports with the state.

One candidate was unaware of the specifics of the rules. Another simply fell behind and is trying to catch up. A third missed a report because of a fire and then refused to file any more reports because he says the state wouldn’t help him in his time of need.

One of the candidates, Providence city Councilman Kevin Jackson, said he wasn’t trying to hide anything in not filing reports. He said he self-funds his campaigns and hasn’t had a fundraiser in about six years. Jackson said he needs to close down his campaign account with the election board, making future finance reports unnecessary.

As for the court judgment of $23,150 that has already been rendered against him, Jackson said he planned to take legal action to contest it. “It should not be what they’re saying,” Jackson said. “Absolutely not.”

In Cranston, city council candidate Donald Roach said he just fell behind on the reports.

“Basically, it’s my fault for getting so behind. I got behind on two reports and just have not caught up,” said Roach, who is a MINDSETTER™ for GoLocalProv. “I plan to work with the Board of Elections over the next couple of months to resolve the issue. I had a great experience running in 2010 and I want to rectify this situation.”

Candidate refused to file as a form of protest

But a third candidate had a far more complicated explanation. Michael Rollins, who has run for a number of offices in North Providence, said he failed to file a report in 2004 because of a fire in his apartment building. In fact, Rollins said he had just sat down to begin work on the report when the fire alarm sounded.

Rollins said that because he was locked out of his building for a week, he asked for the Board of Elections staff for an extension. When his request was refused, he said he stopped filing future reports in protest, even as he continued to run for other offices in subsequent elections.

“They could have prevented everything by working with me and helping me back in ’04,” Rollins said.

He says he asked the Board of Elections, then the state Attorney General, to take him to court so he could plead his case before a jury. So far, neither agency has granted the request, Rollins said.

Ultimately, he lays blame at the feet of the General Assembly, which passed the law on campaign finance reporting. Rollins said such laws aren’t about transparency, but instead stifle competition as an incumbency-protection measure. He said such laws are blatantly unconstitutional because they violate First Amendment rights to freedom of speech.

State records show Rollins currently owing $104,540. But he says he can’t even afford the $200 to $300 per-hour fees attorneys want to charge him to fight the case in court.

“I couldn’t pay up if I wanted to. It’s a ridiculous amount of money to begin with,” Rollins said.

If you valued this article, please LIKE GoLocalProv.com on Facebook by clicking HERE.


Related Articles


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


I really appreciate having finally been given a chance to tell my side of this entire, most unfortunate mess!

Comment #1 by Mike Rollins on 2013 02 14

Democrats policing other democrats doesn't work too well as history has shown. How much corruption has a democrat attorney general uncovered around here?

Comment #2 by David Beagle on 2013 02 14

The entire system is joke. The unions mis-use the system to funnel hundreds of thousands of dollars to candidates to do their bidding. With little enforcement of the rules, it's no wonder we have wide spread corruption in this state.

Comment #3 by Gov- stench on 2013 02 14

How many of the people on the list are current office holders sworn to up hold the laws of our communities? Why haven't they been forced to pay or resign. I'll tell you why... the laws are a joke and these arrogant men and women think they are above the law. In addition, the people responsible for enforcing the laws are probably contributors to these people.

Comment #4 by Ronald Syper on 2013 02 14

I am a Providence resident and thinking a little more about this I want to encourage the City Council President and other council leaders to take some type of disciplinary action against three members of the council in violation as well as the council staff member that is on the list.

This is yet another scandal that council leaders will attempt to avoid.

Comment #5 by Ronald Syper on 2013 02 14

These laws are meaningless and if you expect these folks to go after their colleagues you are sadly misguided.

Comment #6 by Patrick Holt on 2013 02 14

This is not the first article about campaign finance reporting violations and it won't be the last. The sad reality is that until the Board of Elections decides to get serious about enforcement, many political candidates will continue to ignore the law. Based upon the willful disobedience of so many candidates, the Board should consider requesting that the election laws be amended so that any candidate with outstanding campaign report violations be prohibited from future candidacies until their violations were satisfactorily resolved.
However, I'm not holding my breath waiting for the BOE to show any type or initiative of this nature. Also, which legislator would be brave enough to sponsor such legislation? Why should they, life just keeps humming along just fine under the current conditions. Sadly, this makes a total joke of the campaign finance laws they are sworn to uphold and enforce. And so it goes ladies and gents.

Comment #7 by Harold Stassen on 2013 02 14

There is absolutely no reason that anyone who owes money should be allowed to run for office. Put a law in place that says as of July 5th of the election year you must be paid in full with the board of elections of you will not get the signature papers to run for office and your name will not appear on the ballot. Also, how many Republicans are on this list? That is the simplest solution.

Comment #8 by Matthew Guerra on 2013 02 14

Rollins, Have you paid yet? WTF?
Just sitting down to fill out the report when the fire alarm rang?
Are you kidding me?

Comment #9 by Ned Rivers on 2013 02 14


This system of fining candidates for not filing reports in a timely manner was created with the sole purpose of shedding light on campaign donations to discourage candidates from "doing the wrong thing."

Well, time and time again we have seen politicians who actually filed every single one of their reports on time get indicted and go to prison.

Meanwhile, some small-potatoes councilman or representative without two quarters to rub together gets whacked with fines that often FAR EXCEED the amount of money they ever raised in the first place.

This is a joke and should be corrected. Not because the candidates in question should be let off the hook, but because the disparity is an embarrassment for our entire state.

Comment #10 by Edward Smith on 2013 02 14

I have been on this list for failure to file. I went before the board and had the fine reduced and now a pay a low monthly amount until that reduced fine is paid off. My question is, are other candidates doing the same? Can we have a list of people who have gone before the board and are honoring their agreement? Because while it is important to report the people who are doing the wrong thing, it is even more important to report the people who are doing the right thing.

Comment #11 by Theodore Vecchio on 2013 02 14

While I agree with Mr. Smith, the system is not for people like myself, who put $50 in an account and did not file his last report and subsequent reports. However, I did not follow the law as it is written. Ignorance is not an excuse and I agreed to pay the reduced fine which was over 50 times the amount I had in my account. My issue is, I have been paying regularly. I have been upholding my end of the bargain. Are other people doing the same? I my town, I had a huge headline in the local paper and was ripped by even Arlene Violet in her column the following week. But in the end, here I am, paying the fine every month and no one knows or cares. But when you don't pay i guess that is worth writing about. I guess telling both sides of a story is not as important as it once was.

Comment #12 by Theodore Vecchio on 2013 02 14

@T. Vecchio:
You raise a very fair point. Based on your representation, you admitted your error and have taken responsibility by paying off the imposed fine (which in this case seems somewhat egregious). How about a little reporting on the people who DO take responsibility and uphold their agreement! Nope, that's not sexy enough to garner the necessary headlines that most news organizations or blogs thirst for to get readers. As the GoLocal article shows, you have perennial (loser) candidates like this Gryzch dude,who basically thumbs his nose at the campaign reporting requirements. This is the same dimwit who has been cited by the BOE for other election violations (shut in ballots, etc,) yet he is still allowed to file his papers to run every two years. Beyond ridiculous.

Comment #13 by Harold Stassen on 2013 02 14

If there's anyone you can trust to pay what they owe....it's a politician.

Comment #14 by pearl fanch on 2013 02 14

@Pearl fanch excellent insight. And people wonder why good people do not run for office. Branded as a career politician.

Food for thought: In July 2011 top 20 Candidate list was introduced with the lowest at $9979 in fees. This year, top 30 with the lowest at $7753. Why the increase if the least amount is not comparable to previous list?

Also, of the top 20 in 2011, only 3 names have been removed, including myself. Just saying.

Comment #15 by Theodore Vecchio on 2013 02 14

Take a good look at most of the politicians in this state and you will find quite a few chilsers and deadbeats.

Comment #16 by Robert Anthony on 2013 02 14

Good sign that we, the people, are actually holding RI's politicians accountable for their bribes (campaign contributions). Of course, their excuses for not reporting their bribes from "special interests" will run from: "I just didn't know the rules", Or "I am so important that rules don't apply to me", to "what's a rule?"

Comment #17 by Charles Marsh on 2013 02 15

The fact that these criminals, I mean politicians, continue to be allowed to sit in office, or run for future offices, tells you all you need to know about politics in RI.

There's a list of at least one million items, as to why RI is a laughing stock to the rest of the nation.
Yet, in RI, we look at it as "business as usual"

Comment #18 by pearl fanch on 2013 02 15

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.