| | Advanced Search

 

Organizations Past Due on Police Detail: See Who Owes the Most—Organizations Past Due on Police Detail: See Who…

Santurri: Will The Democratic Race for Providence Mayor Become Primarily Negative?—Santurri: Will The Democratic Race for Providence Mayor…

It’s All About Education: High Stakes Testing & Common Core Debate—It’s All About Education: High Stakes Testing &…

Angela Moore Fashion Show and Champagne Brunch Debuts at Rosecliff—To celebrate the 375th anniversary of Newport, the…

Media Days Come To Rhode Island—The American Athletic Conference's Media Day took place…

Newport Manners & Etiquette: Teen Manners—Summer manners opportunities for teenagers, selfies to plan…

Beck Brings Down the House at PPAC—Rick Farrell of Mojo Photography in Riverside was…

Chef Walter’s Flavors + Knowledge: Muhammara Syrian Dip—Muhammara is one of the most popular mezze…

John Perilli: On Going Negative—John Perilli: On Going Negative– What if negative…

10 “Accurate” Rhode Island Stereotypes—NEW: 10 "Accurate" Rhode Island Stereotypes

 
 

Lawmaker Renews Call for Run-Off Elections in Governor’s Race

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

 

Lincoln Chafee won his election as governor in 2010 with just 36 percent of the vote, a fact that some lawmakers feel justifies a move toward run-off elections in races where no candidate can obtain a majority of votes.

When Rhode Island Governor Lincoln Chafee won election to his position in 2010 with just 36.1 percent of the vote, his opponents said that the results meant that the majority of the state’s voters “weren’t being represented” by the office.

The solution, they argued, was to institute run-off elections in future races with more than two candidates on the ballot in an effort to prevent one person from assuming the state’s highest position with less than a majority of voters on their side.

That initial push died in the House Judiciary Committee but, two years later—and two years before the next election—it may be revving back up again.

State Representative Spencer Dickinson introduced a joint resolution to the House of Representatives last week right before the deadline to file legislation that he hopes restarts the conversation on run-off elections.

And at a time when the 2014 Governor’s Race is shaping up and may include any number of high-profile candidates who could split the vote a variety of ways, the South Kingstown Democrat hopes now is the time that it will finally get some traction in the General Assembly.

Lessons From 2010

Dickinson’s resolution, if adopted, would ask voters to approve a constitutional amendment mandating run-off elections whenever a candidate for governor fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in a race.

The State Rep believes voters need look no further than the current State House to see that change is necessary.

Chafee defeated Robitaille by just under 10,000 votes in that election but the margin of victory was only a difference of 2.5 percent thanks in large part to the performance of third and fourth-place finishers as Democratic candidate Frank Caprio’s garnered 23 percent of the vote and Moderate Party President Ken Block gained the support of 22,146 voters, or 6.5 percent total.

“Chafee’s serving with 36 percent of the vote, which I think is not how it should be,” he said. “I don’t think Chafee should be serving with 36 percent and his governorship is a reminder that this is a problem and that it can happen. I think the percentage … wow, it’s just barely over a third so what a great example. But even if he weren’t Governor, I would still think that we need to accept the idea of run-off elections.”

Had Dickinson’s proposal been law in 2010, Chafee and Robitaille, who won 33.6 percent of the vote, would have gone in front of voters again with the winner needing at least 50 percent of all votes cast to take the reins of Governor.

A Master Lever Reaction

Dickinson feels his resolution is especially important and timely given the statewide support, led by Block, to abolish the so-called ‘master-lever’ ahead of the next general election.

Block has said for years that the ability for voters to cast a straight-party ticket puts independent candidates at a disadvantage and his movement appears to be gaining support as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have pledged to remove it if, and when, given an opportunity this session.

If that motion moves forward, Dickinson says, the most high-profile political races may become full of independent candidates vying for voter attention as the state shifts away from down-ticket voting on future ballots.

“I think there’s nothing wrong with asking the voters to be a little more thoughtful but I think the two things have to go together,” he said. “I don’t think you want to generate third, fourth, fifth, x number of third parties without having the provision. That dilutes the race even further if it becomes a viable concept, which it would if we eliminated the master lever.”

No Time Like the Present

Dickinson says there was a movement to push for run-off elections following Chafee’s win in 2010 but the talk has since died down.

“That’s the thing,” he said. “We tend to focus on what’s currently important and there’s certainly a reason for that but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be thinking about these other issues.”

And while he says the General Assembly should focus its time this legislative season “focusing on the economy,” he believes a matter this important is at least worthy of consideration.

“You do have to do the housekeeping and take care of the basics and this is one of them,” he said. “I think it deserves discussion.”
 

 

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Comments:

I agree, we need run off elections, people shouldn't get in office with 36 percent of the vote!

Comment #1 by anthony sionni on 2013 02 20

I suspect support for this runoff idea is just anti-Chafee, but a consequnce of the runoff might be to discourage independent (or Moderate) candidates who won't have party resources in a runoff. Since I think the Democrats are all too influenced by patronage-driven insiders who see government as a source of income and power, and Republicans all too influenced by big business interests and religous zealots with little concern for the community at large, I am skeptical of anything that would make it harder for Independents to succeed.

Comment #2 by barry schiller on 2013 02 20

While the run-off would prevent another 36% governor, it would also extend an already overbearing and annoying campaign process. If a runoff passes (and I hope it does) then I hope it would be required to happen quickly and the two candidates barred from any further campaign activity.

Comment #3 by Todd Sandahl on 2013 02 20




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.