| | Advanced Search


Ric Santurri: Solomon – Do As I Say, Not As I Do—As the Democratic primary for Mayor of Providence…

LISTEN: 72% of 2014 Gubernatorial Campaign Expenditures Spent Out of State—While each candidate for Governor talks about creating…

Gary Sasse: Are Gubernational Candidates Being Realistic and Focused?—As Rhode Island enters the homestretch of the…

Chef Walter’s Flavors + Knowledge: Blueberry Crisp—Blueberry crisp is a popular comfort-dessert, relatively simple…

Brewed Awakenings in Warwick To Open in September—Brewed Awakenings' fifth and largest coffee house will…

Tufts Health Plan and Radio Disney Brought Magic of Healthy Living to Pawtucket—Tufts Health Plan and Radio Disney AM 1260…

RI Groups Urge Police to Support Public’s Right to Record Police Activity—Nine local organizations have asked police departments across…

Fun, Fun, Fun - Beach Boys Play Newport—A spirited crowd filled the Newport Yachting Center…

Organize + Energize: 10 Ways to Make Your Mornings Easier—How many of you rush around in the…

Dear John: Does He Have a Secret Life?—She found lipstick in his car...


Lawmaker Proposes ‘Back to Work’ Program for RI

Saturday, January 12, 2013


State Representative Joseph McNamara is calling for the creation of a “Back to Work Rhode Island Program” to assist unemployed Rhode Islanders to get jobs and job training.

Modeled after similar programs in Georgia and New Hampshire, the Rhode Island program proposed in the McNamara legislation will address the concerns of both the unemployed and employers by allowing individuals to continue to collect unemployment benefits while they take part in an approved, unpaid training program with a qualified Rhode Island employer.

The legislation acknowledges certain facts – that Rhode Island’s unemployment rate remains the highest in the New England region (10.4 percent); that businesses continue to have difficulty finding job candidates with appropriate knowledge and skills; that employers are hesitant to invest in training if there is a risk the investment will not result in a qualified and skilled employee.

“Employers, especially small businesses, remain uncertain about taking on new employees in the current economy, and it can be difficult for someone who is unemployed to give up benefits for a job that may not pan out, or for an entry level/training position that pays less than a benefit check,” he said.

McNamara’s bill would be overseen by the Department of Labor and Training. Individuals receiving unemployment compensation would be matched with an employer that has applied to DLT and met certain requirements. The employer would provide the individual (who would continue to receive benefits) with skill enhancement and job training relevant to an open employment position for up to 24 hours per week for up to six weeks, at the end of which the individual must be considered for permanent employment. During the six weeks of training when the individual continues to receive unemployment benefits, the employer would not compensate the individual in any way other than the training.

The bill makes the program voluntary, allowing employers to terminate participation at any time and restricting participation to the first 200 individuals determined eligible by the DLT. It also encouraged individuals seeking work to find employment opportunities that align with their current job skills and knowledge, and encourages them to end a training relationship they do not find beneficial, preserving the remainder of the six-week training period for another placement..

“The greatest benefit is that the better this program works, the more unemployed Rhode Islanders find jobs,” McNamara said. “Our top focus in this state must be getting people back to work. This program provides another tool to do that, to help people learn new skills and find work, to help businesses grow and take on more employees.”

The legislation has been referred to the House Committee on Finance. Co-sponsors include Rep. Jan P. Malik (D-Dist. 67, Barrington, Warren), Rep. Raymond E. Gallison Jr. (D-Dist. 69, Bristol, Portsmouth), Rep. James N. McLaughlin (D-Dist. 57, Central Falls, Cumberland) and Rep. K. Joseph Shekarchi (D-Dist. 23, Warwick).


Enjoy this post? Share it with others.


Sounds a lot more complicated than reducing taxes to become more "friendly" to businesses. Seriously. I have some experience with the JTPA program, in which employers got a tax brak for employing people from "underserved" categories, such as persons with DD or other Special Needs. Paperwork, extra monitoring by government, and other bureaucratic considerations, made this program an afterthought in most cases. Just work on the tax burdens, and get us out of this hole we are in. New programs are just new jobs for the well-connected.

Comment #1 by Michael Trenn on 2013 01 12

What's preventing employers from hiring? Obamacare for one thing. Increased taxes and regulations for other things.

Michael is right: Just take the short route to economic growth by lowering taxes -- and eliminating as many regulations as possible. This is not rocket science. When governments enable business and individuals to keep more of what they make, creativity is unleashed.

Having government take away from individual initiative is incredibly discouraging -- it's a huge disincentive and a blow to the spirit. It feels like theft. Government can lift up the spirit by taking a "customer service" approach rather than standing in the way with yet more programs and control.

Comment #2 by Art West on 2013 01 12

Ask this clown about the Car Tax Reform legislation he didnt follow through on. That ONE single unfair thing that causes people to register their car out of state and then ultimately move away. RI - "By Losers, For Losers"

Comment #3 by Ford Renner on 2013 01 12

This sounds pretty good, what did happen to the car tax bill?

Comment #4 by anthony sionni on 2013 01 13

C'mon Anthony! You expect this "news team" to actually investigate? They make lists and throw things against the wall. No follow up.

Comment #5 by tom brady on 2013 01 13

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.